Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

The Insitance on Perfection by the Imperfect

One of the great pressures we put on each other is to believe in some kind of perfection and it's an unnecessary pressure. Accepting that moral, physical or practical perfection is impossible will free us from a lot of self-doubt and metaphorical 'beating up' when we feel we are not quite getting things right and also prevent us from piling in on others who have made errors in judgement or other perceived imperfections.

However, we should strive to be the best we can where we have the power to change, but when faced with a body that doesn't conform to the current norms of beauty (which is 99% of us when we look in the mirror) we're best off remembering that no-one is perfect in that way. Or on realising that words have slipped out that we wish hadn't from our mouth or keyboard, sincerely apologise where necessary and move on. And if we are on the end of an apology for an 'offence', perhaps the humility of remembering out own imperfections will keep us from being bitter.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
What's a perfect color?
How about a perfect temperature?

A perfect sound?
A perfect smell?
A perfect rock?
A perfect circle?

Can you think of anything that is perfect?
Or is everything already perfect as is?
FreddieUK · 70-79, M
@DeWayfarer An excellent response. Thanks
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@DeWayfarer Good questions... They can be "perfect" for something but I would define the "perfect circle" by pure geometry!
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@ArishMell ok give π to it's last digit for that "perfect" circle! 🤷🏻‍♂

If you can do it geometrically you would have that last digit of π. Yet the radius would be irrational. The perfect circle being 2πr.

Either way it's not perfect.

Concepts really don't fit into reality very well. Just the broad outlines. The trees get lost in the forest. And every tree has a different perspective.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@DeWayfarer Yes, pi is a very strange ratio indeed!

When I was at school in the 1960s we received an eight-page magazine described by its own title, Mathematical Pie, published three times a year. Full of a very eclectic mix of mathematical topics, it was started in 1950 and is still published, now by the Mathematical Association. Editions up to 1984 are available in pdf form.

I recall one topic described a rotary drill of creating square holes (presumably with rounded corners, and another showing the geometry of the recently-invented, Wankel rotary i.c. engine.

Along the bottom margin of each page were groups of digits. All together, from edition to edition, they were the value of π calculated somewhere to the umpteenth decimal place - as if whoever was doing that had nowt better to do. I don't know how far it reached.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@ArishMell oh there's a site I once saw that the download was in the megabytes. 🤣

How do you use such a number? 🤷🏻‍♂🤣

Here a million digits...

https://www.piday.org/million/

Now a billion digits! 🤣

https://stuff.mit.edu/afs/sipb/contrib/pi/pi-billion.txt

Who has a quantum computer to use either one? 🤷🏻‍♂