I think I'm gonna stop watching movies and tv shows unless they're medical or documentaries about real people and not celebs

Understandable that you choose this … it’s been horrendous to watch the corruption in the senate … a dodgy attorney general and all those who sold themselves out for 15 minutes of fame so I hear ya in some ways

I personally don’t believe in guilty by association in every case

I’ve had my photo taken with unpleasant people offline doesn’t mean I’m the same as them

Hope you get the chance to enjoy some good coffee and a chill today 🌹 ☕

Much of the "celebrity" world is meretricious but you cannot accuse them all of wrong-doing simply because a few break the law. They are no different from anyone else, even if they have a lot more money than most of us, but there is probably no more evil around than there ever was.

If anything, probably less because humanity as a whole has slowly become more humane, but also because it is harder to keep quiet about being a criminal. There are undeniably desperately awful things going on, but the majority and the worst are by tyrannical and terrorists; not "celebrities", Wall Street hangers-on, business oligarchs and the like.

No-one is "flaunting" anything. Wrong-doers are desperate to keep very quiet about it. Instead, their wrongs are being revealed, and we hear or read so much about it partly due to an exciteable Press feeding a very salacious public and concentrating on the worst more than all of, the offences.

Being famous is not a crime!

I can understand your feelings, but "real people" are just as likely to be evil as celebrities are -- it's just we hear less about them because they are NOT famous.

I mostly watch YouTubes on science, math, and history.

The last one was how to take the derivative of a complex function. Fascinating.

A function that maps the 2 dimensional complex plane into itself cannot be graphed, since you need 4 dimensions. Yet it can be visualized as a transformation (rotation, translation, warping, rescaling, twisting, etc.) of the plane.

Now, suppose you want to know the derivative (instantaneous rate of change) of the function at a point P. Suppose you could draw a very very small grid of perpendicular coordinate lines near a point P, and then see what happens to this tiny grid when you apply the function.

Suppose all that happens is a rotation and rescaling of the grid near P. This also preserves all angles of intersecting lines. Then the derivative exists at P and is equal to the complex number that encodes this rotation and rescaling.

If you multiply a complex number A by a complex number B, it will rotate and rescale the A-vector in the complex plane. The amount of rotation is just the angle between the Y-vector and the real axis (x-axis), and the rescaling factor is just the length of the Y-vector.

Math is so cool.

But you're an SW celebrity!

I actually fight with this alot too. It's crazy how broad this thing is but unfortunately i feel it will always finds its way. Shits disturbing

Just because their name is mentioned in the documents that in no way means they did anything wrong.

Medical shows? Hopefully you have no tendency to hypochondria.😮