This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly AdultUpset
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Neo-liberals went from "my body my choice," and when that idiom failed, they reduced the unborn baby to "fetal matter."

Another moot argument made by the neo-liberals and baby hating feminists is that victims of rape should be allowed to terminate their pregnancy, Rape accounts for less than 1% of abortion cases, and the abortion laws that are being proposed, and the one currently in place in Texas allows for abortion up to 6 weeks - that's plenty of time for a rape victim to decide if she wants to abort the baby. No, women are not going to die because the law does make an exception for women in those circumstances where their life is in danger.

It's not "your body, your choice." There's also the life of a baby involved. It makes no difference if the baby will be poor. Poor babies have just as much right to life as the affluent. Babies born with physical handicaps have just as much right to life as those who are physically healthy. In India & China, selective abortions have killed millions of female babies - substantially reducing the population of girls, but you don't hear any outcry from the feminists about that.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@ViciDraco Show me in The Constitution where abortion is mentioned
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@sunsporter1649 Replying to roadkill makes more sense than trying to get a straight answer from @ViciDraco . He thinks his drivel makes sense. It is such tripe as to worthy only of being ignored.
ViciDraco · 41-45, M
@sunsporter1649 so you are saying that it is okay to declare everyone an organ donor? I don't see anything in the constitution that protects against that. We can make blood donations mandatory for all citizens to perform four times a year? Constitution doesn't say anything about that either.

Abortion is about bodily autonomy. If you want to claim we have no right to bodily autonomy, then you will be okay when we make it a federal crime to not get certain vaccinations.
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@ViciDraco Do you even think about this before you post it? Seriously? What planet do you live on? According to you if I don't give you my left kidney you have the right to kill someone else? Really? Because you don't have government health care you have the right to kill people? Seriously? Give your head a shake. Not too hard it might fall off.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@hippyjoe1955 If they keep spinning like that they are gonna fall off the planet and end up om Uranus
ViciDraco · 41-45, M
@hippyjoe1955 nobody said anything about a right to kill anyone. We are a talking about a right to deny personal bodily resources to provide for the survival of another.

I'm sorry you are not able to grasp the separation of "not supporting" and "killing" when it comes to a fetus. Whether you are not smart enough or are purposefully not trying to understand I cannot say. Maybe some of both. You seem to understand it pretty well when it comes to healthcare though. Funny that.
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@ViciDraco That is exactly what you are saying and for you to deny it simply adds to the fact that your mental pablum is not well thought out at all.