Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

What the NY Times has said in its editorial for online readers:

A third day of devastating fires in Los Angeles
The economic cost of wildfires in Los Angeles could exceed $50 billion, after three days of fast-moving fires that have burned tens of thousands of acres and forced tens of thousands of people from their homes. Here’s the latest.

Local officials yesterday hoped that decreased winds would finally give firefighters a chance to control the blazes. Helicopters and planes dropped water from the sky, and firefighters battled on the ground. Despite the subsiding winds, the risk remained for current fires to spread and for other fires to ignite.

At least five people have died in the firestorms, and the Los Angeles County sheriff said he expected the death toll to rise. One of the blazes — the Palisades fire, in one of the city’s most affluent areas — has damaged or destroyed thousands of buildings and has burned more than 17,200 acres.

On the ground: The fires have torn through communities of every socioeconomic status and stripe, affecting mansions as well as ’70s townhouses, ranches and subdivisions. Residents are overwhelmed by the pervasiveness and see themselves as stuck in the middle of a mega-catastrophe.

Aid: President Biden said that the federal government would pay for 100 percent of the firefighting needs in the area for the next 180 days.
514Kra · 22-25, FNew
Is it strange how quickly they arrive at a cost, 💲 even before the fires 🔥 are out!?
pdockal · 56-60, M
@514Kra

That's the world we live in
Actuaries have figured the value of EVERYTHING
Convivial · 26-30, F
This will affect insurance costs world wide
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment