Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Why is Healthcare in America more expensive than other countries even though the quality is worse

U.S. healthcare is more expensive due to higher prices for services, drugs, and salaries, driven by less regulation, complex administration (waste), hospital consolidation (less competition), and a focus on high-tech, fee-for-service care rather than prevention, leading to worse overall population health outcomes compared to other wealthy nations that control costs better. While quality of care once you're sick can be high in the U.S., systemic issues mean higher spending doesn't translate to better national health or access, say Harvard and KFF experts.

Key Reasons for High Costs

Higher Prices: The U.S. pays much more for the same services, drugs, and even doctor salaries than other countries.

Administrative Waste: A complex, multi-payer system (private insurance, Medicare, etc.) creates massive bureaucracy and billing costs.

Lack of Price Regulation: Unlike other nations where governments negotiate drug/service prices, the U.S. largely lets the market set them, allowing for huge markups, especially for pharmaceuticals.

Hospital Consolidation: Mergers between hospitals and provider groups reduce competition, giving them power to charge more.

Fee-for-Service Model: Doctors and hospitals are paid for each service, encouraging more tests, procedures, and technology, rather than preventive care.

Tech & Innovation Costs: High adoption of advanced tech (MRIs, PET scans) and new drugs drives up spending.

Why Outcomes Aren't Better:

Less Focus on Prevention: The system prioritizes treating illness over keeping people healthy, as noted by Quora users

Access Issues: Despite high spending, many Americans have trouble seeing doctors or getting timely care, with fewer physicians per capita than peers.

Poor Population Health: The U.S. has worse health outcomes (like lower life expectancy) than many high-income countries, even with higher spending.

In essence, the U.S. pays premium prices for a fragmented system that doesn't deliver superior overall health, focusing more on high-cost interventions than basic, preventative care.

Your thoughts on how to make it better??
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
MethDozer · M
It's because it is privatized which means it's core concern is profits for boards and investors and not delivering proper care.
dancingtongue · 80-89, M
@MethDozer Not totally privatized, which is the great irony. Those who want to keep it privatized for the for-profit insurers and providers because they don't want to pay the taxes or give handouts or cover "illegals" don't seem to realize that the uninsured flock to the PUBLIC hospitals and their ERs, which are largely paid for by local property taxes. And the uninsured postpone all primary and preventive care that would keep them healthier, wait until their health issues are severe and then seek treatment in ER's and other most-expensive care units.
MethDozer · M
@dancingtongue big facts
MethDozer · M
@dancingtongue Related but unrelated.

It's sorta like the arguement of any UBI making people less likely to work. Meanwhile my hometown was part of a study that provided $500 a month in UBI to a large test sample of folks. Shocker! Tje argument against fell flat. One kf the bug findings was people who signed up for the study who got it missed far less work over the year as opposed to the families who do not. The general reasoning being thkse who received it were able to accomdate and afford sitters or temporary daycare when a child became sick or had an appointment. Where those who were scrapping by didnt have the funds on hand to deal with it and it just take the hit and deal with the losenof income on a future date. People fail to acknowledge how unmotivating amd draining being paycheck to paycheck is and how severaly it affects productivity.
dancingtongue · 80-89, M
@MethDozer A couple of cities near me have done the same pilot studies with the same results. Plus it encouraged some to start there own small businesses, or go into training and higher education programs to improve their skills and employability, moving up the economic scale.