Get Your Covid Injection to Protect Granny Selfish

And surprise, surprise.....Pfizer knew all along it didnt protect granny. Pfizer executive: "at the time of introduction the vaccine had NEVER been tested on stopping the transmission of the virus" to the EU.

This opens a huge can of worms (many already knew of the bogus efficacy). Injection ID now was clearly about control/surveillance. The line "get it done for others more vulnerable" now is defunct and the mandatory injections were already morally reprehensible but even more so after this statement.

We have been lied to on an epic scale. Time for some to admit this was so and repair the division it has sown

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

SW-User

I can [b][i]TOTALLY[/i][/b] understand why you are [i][b]NOT[/b][/i] offering any [b][i]SOURCE[/i][/b] for this quote, or anything [b][i]BEYOND[/i][/b] the quote that would further back up the quote itself ... because you have nothing ... which has been the story for your side for the last few years ... does it not get [b][i]exhausting[/i][/b] for you to keep up this charade? What have you gained from it in all these months and years?

The only people lying on an epic scale are people like you, over and over and over and over and over and over and over again ... and do you see how little your lies have changed anything? How the only people you persuade are those on the fringe just like you?

"Somebody told me that someone said that another unnamed person CONFESSED to blah blah blah, but nobody else heard it, so just trust me" is no more evidence of anything now that any similar nonsensical statement uttered by your ilk one or two years ago was back then. You literally have not learned what constitutes evidence in all these months.

It's also just bizarre to watch someone vainly try to weaponize the calls for a "source" on anything like this, as though people are sheep for expecting a source, rather than sheep for believing things [i][b]without[/b][/i] a source. Projecting one's gullibility and stupidity onto others does not erase it in the one doing the projection.

gol979 · 41-45, M

@SW-User so if i spoon feed you the source, which is a pfizer executive, chuckling and saying "of course we didnt test for transmission, we were moving at the speed of science", you would be surprised because you think corporations like pfizer have never lied, never been fined for lying?

gol979 · 41-45, M

@SW-User ahhh, sumkindamosnter posted it below. Have a look, see what you think

SW-User

@gol979 spoon feeding my @ass, you're just lazy (and that in turn wastes a lot of people's time, when you could've saved that time by just posting the link you were thinking of; moreover, people on SW block each other, so waiting for someone else to later do the work an post it for you is both lazy and unreliable, since when another user finally posts it, anyone asking you for it may have that other user blocked or be blocked by them)

Moreover, that Dutch goober THINKS he has some kind of major gotcha point, when in reality he has a nothingburger (see other comments here on your post), which you in turn are passing along as some big gotcha point ... and when exactly did the drug companies ever SAY "oh yeah, we tested this for x, y, and z" so that you can act like they later lied about x or y?

As far as corporations lying goes, of course we know it happens, and the right wing will seleectively avoid that when it also suits their narrative, like on climate change, and ExxonMobil lying to people about it

You think you've exposed something major here, but it's just more of the same Covidiot narrative

gol979 · 41-45, M

@SW-User Okayyyy. Presumably the "covidiot" narrative is thinking this injection stops covid 😉