Upset
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

This, on the other hand, is DISASTROUS

[b]How unspeakably foolish to have administered these products to millions of women of child-bearing age WITHOUT DOING THESE STUDIES FIRST! There are no words to condemn this outrage.

There will be no forgiveness for our medical overlords if they have managed to mess up reproductive functions[/b]


(Headline today from GB newspaper The Daily Mail)
Do you not know what an emergency is? If you are tied to some train tracks with an oncoming train should I take years of study to make sure you aren't going to kill someone in the future before saving you?
WalterF · 70-79, M
@canusernamebemyusername Not a valid comparison.
Quit fearnongering. You aren't even a woman, so I'm not even sure why you care so much about the effects of the vaccine on our monthly cycles anyway.
WalterF · 70-79, M
@HootyTheNightOwl That's a bit naive. I know young women starting out on their lives, hoping to have children. They will be heart-broken if their child-bearing ability is interfered with. Is this not a legitimate resson for my concern? It's not just all about you.
The Daily Mail is barely one step above the National Enquirer.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@LeopoldBloom Daily Fail consistently generates lulz though, that’s something.
WalterF · 70-79, M
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@WalterF Yes.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
You don’t do specialized studies of this nature until after mass rollout anyhow, unless something is acute enough to show up in phase 3 - and in that case you generally scrap the product.

This is phase 4 - ongoing post-release research and monitoring.

Sky is falling though, for reals.
Quetzalcoatlus · 46-50, M
Okay 👌🏽
CestManan · 46-50, F
So they are just NOW looking into this?
WalterF · 70-79, M
@LeopoldBloom On the contrary, it's totally real. There, you and I / "us" are in full agreement. It's real, and can be very nasty. Where we might disagree is on its origin. And purpose. And treatment. It's not a virus (never been isolated by Koch's postulate) it's an engineered infectious agent. Fauci lied to cover what the paper trail shows - it was given "gain of function," that is, weaponised, by the Chinese, with Fauci's approval. The rest is history.
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@WalterF [quote] It's not a virus [/quote]
🤣🤣🤣

[quote] Koch's postulate)[/quote]
🤣🤣🤣
WalterF · 70-79, M
@QuixoticSoul I'm so glad you're enjoying your day!
Ingwe · F
we've known from early on the vaccine affected fertility
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@Ingwe No, we did not, and we still do not.
Ingwe · F
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@Ingwe We do not.
What about these products, then??? These were literally killing women dead on the streets.

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHHEAjDCksQ]
yeronlyman · 51-55, M
strongbow · 46-50, M
It was no accident..
WalterF · 70-79, M
@QuixoticSoul You should enlarge the scope of your research. Read outside the Fact Checkers, Wikipedia, Google, science.com, etc. They're all bought and biased. / If only tbere was just ONE bogeyman! Add to Gates A. Fauci, who lies publicly (but doesn't get an FBI raid on his house), Tedros of the WHO (no medical qualifications), Schwab of the WEF, member by marriage of the Rockefeller family... There's a long list, and they're playing you...
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@WalterF Deranged screed number two is similarly unhinged, what a shocker.

[quote] Tedros of the WHO (no medical qualifications)[/quote]
Masters in immunology
PhD in community health
Worked in public health basically his entire career.

Unqualified 🤣
WalterF · 70-79, M
@QuixoticSoul Also on the barricades. Check your fact checkers. Many of them lie to promote The Narrative and keep you trusting sleepers asleep.

And lying Fauci? who shared a flat in student days with Gates - no doubt already planning how to make their billions.

So,to conclude this [i]dialogue de sourds, [/i]your position, as it comes across, is: you believe that all is for the best in a world which is able to defeat nasty epidemics (covid downgraded from pandemic in March 2020 but EUA retained, as it suited goverments), and which is led by fearless, selfless, loving leaders with only the good of their subjects in mind. You do not, apparently, believe in evil. Nor in greed, where the possession of money and power can lead to the desire for even more money and power, and scruples can go out the window. You are happy to bow to Schwab's openly published declaration in the Great Reset program, that we "will own nothing and be happy".

Personally, I can't be so naive as to worship before the feet of these jumped-up pioneers of Human 2.0 (as in the UK gov's recently published 110-page document on Transhumanism). I will resist.

I suggest that you give your concluding remarks, then we move on. Each of us has work to do, promoting our respective positions on the Fourth Industrial Revolution, into which they are moving us at breakneck speed.

 
Post Comment