Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Chemo, vs. nothing?

My dad, who was diagnosed last week with an aggressive form of cancer, Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma, has a choice of low dose chemotherapy or no treatment. They do not recommend the low dose currently, Bec even low dose "may" cause infection that can sometimes be fatal. They said hes very compromised being a stroke victim.
But they said we can always get another oncologist who would be ok with doing treatment. It can potentially eradicate much of the cancer.

OR, the option is to not treat it and go into palliative care. I asked how long he might have, they said anything from several weeks to a few months 🙁 My dad initially refused treatment, but after we discussed further, he said hed like to try treatment, and if hes too ill he'll stop.
What might you choose /hope for a loved one? (Of course it's their actual choice overall)
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Boeing · 36-40
That is a very hard choice over there. And it's ultimately his to make.
Looking into this for a while, I see that palliative care can be effective, and if faced as an option, like you say, and not as a way of letting go of life, it can have great benefits.
Chemotherapy on the other hand is hopeful, giving the person the benefit of the fight, to be given hope that there is a possibility to be cured.
I believe if palliative care is done right, can also include this hope for treatment, as, if the patient truly makes peace with himself, there have been cases where they were miraculously being brought to life.
Coralmist · 41-45, F
@Boeing That's true, pros and cons with both options. Thank you.
Boeing · 36-40
@Coralmist yes..hold on there, it is a tough period for him and all involved but ultimately he will make the best choice for himself. He's the only one who can do that.