Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Interested to know people's reactions...

[b]If you received Pfizer's covid vaccine, how do you react to the information that has been made available following the publication of tens of thousands of pages of internal vaccine data?

[c=BF0000][u]REMINDER OF THE BACKGROUND[/u]

[i]The FDA initially requested 75 years to release their data on the vaccine. This data was linked to the FDA decision in December 2020 to grant Pfizer-BioNTech “Emergency Use Authorisation” for its mRNA vaccine. This request from the FDA was finally turned down and subsequently, a judge ordered the release of data to begin in March of this year, citing the request as “paramount to public importance”.

The data request came from the Public Health and Medical Professionals, demanding more transparency, who sued the FDA under a Freedom of Information due to the FDA’s initial request of only releasing a “minimum” of 500 pages a month.

In a Januarycourt order, US District Judge Mark Pittman of the Northern District of Texas required the FDA to release around 12,000 documents immediately, and then 55,000 pages a month until all documents are released — totaling more than 300,000 pages in all.

On March 1, 2022, the FDA finally produced its first 10k pages of Pfizer clinical trial documents and after securing the release of the data,Aaron Siri, a lawyer working on the case stated, “Our job was to get the documents. We leave it to the scientists and others to analyse.”[/i][/c]

[b]Obviously, thousands of scientists, researchers and medical experts the world over, all anxious to investigate the way medical science is evolving, have understandably been analysing this data and reporting their findings.

If you took this Pfizer vaccine, how do you react to the information obtained? Do you find it encouraging? worrying? enlightening? reassuring?[/b]
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Confined · 56-60, M
Ive not seen it. Where can we view it?
WalterF · 70-79, M
@Confined It's in the public domain. But the media will never tell you about it, nor tell you how to read documents synthesising it.

There is a mass effort by search engines to condemn the analyses as mis/dis/mal/ etc-information. This is done shallowly by so-called fact-checkers

Try duckduckgo or braveheart search engines, and type "pfizer documents released." The results may give you some idea of what the FDA wanted to hide for 75 years. And ask yourself, why would they want to cover it up for nearly a century?
Lila15 · 22-25, F
@WalterF But the COVID vaccine has only been around for a few years, and mRNA technology is only 20 years old. What has been suppressed for a “century?”
WalterF · 70-79, M
@Lila15 Nothing HAS BEEN suppressed. The FDA wanted to release Pfizer trial data in a trickle, over 75 years. Finishing near the year 2100. That's nearly a century from now!

Fortunately, tens of thousands of pages of data have been released. They make worrying reading - so worrying, that the mainstream media (who forced people to get jabbed) are totally ignoring this data
Lila15 · 22-25, F
@WalterF The media has no authority to force anyone to be vaccinated.

Has anyone done a study comparing populations from North America and Europe with populations in South America and Africa? It would be interesting to see if there are any differences since the vaccination rates are much higher in the first group than the second.
WalterF · 70-79, M
@Lila15 The media has no authority... Agreed, no formal authority, like for example what the police have.

But they have the powerful influence necessary to push people in the direction they want, by concerted wall-to-wall messaging, so constant and repetitive that most people end up believing them. Examples: the insane idea that "nobody's safe till everybody's safe" (by that reasoning, cars should be banned, as even one road accident would be too many). Etc, etc.

If the media are heavily funded by financiers requiring the propagation of a particular message, they will obey.

And the public, wanting to believe what their TV tells them, will follow meekly. And get injected.
Lila15 · 22-25, F
@WalterF The vaccine isn't perfect, but it seems to keep people from getting sicker than they otherwise would have. And you do have a point with the media. But you have to be really careful with the "alternative" media, where they're also pushing an agenda. I just watched "Died Suddenly," and it's completely transparent anti-vax propaganda that fails to provide any credible backup for its argument that the vaccine is causing weird blood clots.

I would want to see a peer-reviewed study comparing populations in the US and Europe with Africa and Latin America, which would highlight the differences between vaxed and unvaxed populations.