Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Interested to know people's reactions...

[b]If you received Pfizer's covid vaccine, how do you react to the information that has been made available following the publication of tens of thousands of pages of internal vaccine data?

[c=BF0000][u]REMINDER OF THE BACKGROUND[/u]

[i]The FDA initially requested 75 years to release their data on the vaccine. This data was linked to the FDA decision in December 2020 to grant Pfizer-BioNTech “Emergency Use Authorisation” for its mRNA vaccine. This request from the FDA was finally turned down and subsequently, a judge ordered the release of data to begin in March of this year, citing the request as “paramount to public importance”.

The data request came from the Public Health and Medical Professionals, demanding more transparency, who sued the FDA under a Freedom of Information due to the FDA’s initial request of only releasing a “minimum” of 500 pages a month.

In a Januarycourt order, US District Judge Mark Pittman of the Northern District of Texas required the FDA to release around 12,000 documents immediately, and then 55,000 pages a month until all documents are released — totaling more than 300,000 pages in all.

On March 1, 2022, the FDA finally produced its first 10k pages of Pfizer clinical trial documents and after securing the release of the data,Aaron Siri, a lawyer working on the case stated, “Our job was to get the documents. We leave it to the scientists and others to analyse.”[/i][/c]

[b]Obviously, thousands of scientists, researchers and medical experts the world over, all anxious to investigate the way medical science is evolving, have understandably been analysing this data and reporting their findings.

If you took this Pfizer vaccine, how do you react to the information obtained? Do you find it encouraging? worrying? enlightening? reassuring?[/b]
therighttothink50 · 56-60, M
Bill Gates Plans for New Catastrophic Contagion
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/12/19/bill-gates-plans-new-catastrophic-contagion.aspx

[STORY AT-A-GLANCE
* Over time, it’s become clear that the globalist cabal seeking to implement a one world government repeatedly tell us what they’re about to do. Table top pandemic simulations, for example, are a form of dress rehearsal
* In 2017, Johns Hopkins Center of Health Security held a coronavirus pandemic simulation called the SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028 scenario. In October 2019, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in collaboration with Johns Hopkins and the World Economic Forum hosted Event 201
* As in the SPARS Pandemic scenario, Event 201 involved an outbreak of a highly infectious coronavirus, but the primary (if not sole) focus of the exercise was how to control information and keep “misinformation” in check, not how to effectively discover and share remedies
* October 23, 2022, Gates, Johns Hopkins and the World Health Organization cohosted “a global challenge exercise” dubbed “Catastrophic Contagion,” involving a novel pathogen called “severe epidemic enterovirus respiratory syndrome 2025” (SEERS-25), which primarily affects children and teens
* Enterovirus D68 is typically associated with cold and flu-like illness in infants, children and teens. In rare cases, it’s also been known to cause viral meningitis and acute flaccid myelitis, a neurological condition resulting in muscle weakness and loss of reflexes. The virus they modeled in the Catastrophic Contagion simulation appears to be something similar to enterovirus D68, but worse
Over time, it's become clear that the globalist cabal seeking to implement a one world government repeatedly tell us what they're about to do. They hold dress rehearsals in the form of tabletop exercises, and they've revealed their plans in various reports and white papers through the years.
I have been subscribed to the channel that posted the video above for some time now. She only has 10K subscribers but really gets some amazing content. I have no idea how she was able to secure this video as it is not widely circulated. Even more surprising is that her channel is not being taken down.
COVID Dress Rehearsals
For example, in 2017, Johns Hopkins Center of Health Security held a coronavirus pandemic simulation called the SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028 scenario.1 Importantly, the exercise highlighted and stressed "communication dilemmas concerning medical countermeasures that could plausibly emerge" in a pandemic scenario.
In October 2019, less than three months before the COVID-19 outbreak, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in collaboration with Johns Hopkins and the World Economic Forum hosted Event 201.
As in the SPARS Pandemic scenario, this exercise involved an outbreak of a highly infectious coronavirus, but the primary (if not sole) focus of the exercise was how to control information and keep "misinformation" in check, not how to effectively discover and share remedies.
Social media censorship played prominently in the Event 201 plan, and in the real-world events of 2020 through the present, accurate information about vaccine development, production and injury has indeed been effectively suppressed around the world, thanks to social media companies and Google's censoring of opposing viewpoints.

We now know this censorship was illegally directed by U.S. government officials, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, who was recently deposed2 about his role in the online censoring of COVID information.
Both of these simulations, SPARS and Event 201, foreshadowed what eventually occurred in real life during COVID, so, when Gates hosts yet another pandemic exercise, it's worth paying attention to the details.
'Catastrophic Contagion' Exercise
October 23, 2022, Gates, Johns Hopkins and the World Health Organization cohosted "a global challenge exercise" dubbed "Catastrophic Contagion,"3,4 involving a novel (and as of now fictional) pathogen called "severe epidemic enterovirus respiratory syndrome 2025" or SEERS-25 for short.
Enterovirus D685 is typically associated with cold and flu-like illness in infants, children and teens. In rare cases, it's also been known to cause viral meningitis and acute flaccid myelitis, a neurological condition resulting in muscle weakness and loss of reflexes in one or more extremities.
The virus they modeled in the Catastrophic Contagion simulation appears to be something similar to enterovirus D68, but worse.
Enteroviruses A71 and A6 are known to cause hand, foot and mouth disease,6 while poliovirus, the prototypical enterovirus, causes polio (poliomyelitis), a potentially life-threatening type of paralysis that primarily affects children under age 5. So, the virus they modeled in this simulation appears to be something similar to enterovirus D68, but worse.

Training African Leaders to Go Along With the Narrative
Tellingly, the Catastrophic Contagion exercise focused on getting leadership in African countries involved and trained in following the script. Participants included 10 current and former Health Ministers and senior public health officials from Senegal, Rwanda, Nigeria, Angola, Liberia, Singapore, India and Germany, as well as Gates himself.
African nations just so happened to go "off script" more often than others during the COVID pandemic, and didn't follow in the footsteps of developed nations when it came to pushing the jabs. As a result, vaccine makers now face the problem of having a huge control group, as the COVID jab uptake on the African continent was only 6%.7
Not surprisingly (for those in the know), Africa has fared far better than developed nations with high COVID jab rates in terms of COVID-19 infections and related deaths.8
Now, the Catastrophic Contagion exercise predicts SEERS-25 will kill 20 million people worldwide, including 15 million children, and many who survive the infection will be left with paralysis and/or brain damage. In other words, the "cue" given is that the next pandemic will likely target children rather than the elderly, as was the case with COVID-19.
This is an interesting coincidence, seeing how rates of toddlers and young children hospitalized with influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is already spiking.
COVID Jabs Are Destroying People's Immune Systems
Coincidentally, over the past year, researchers have been warning that the COVID jabs may be dysregulating and destroying people's immune systems, leaving them vulnerable to all sorts of infections. According to a study9 posted on the preprint server medRxiv in May 2021, the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID jab "reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses, causing immune depletion."
In August 2021, a French group of pediatric infectious disease experts also warned that "immunity debt" caused by a lack of exposure to common viruses and bacteria during COVID lockdowns and school closures might predispose children to suffer more infections in the future.10
They predicted the decrease in viral and bacterial exposure that train your child's immune system may result in a rebound of a variety of infectious diseases, including influenza and RSV) which is precisely what we're now seeing. If a modified enterovirus gets added into the mix, it's not difficult to see how parents might get spooked enough to start lining their kids up for more shots — including parents in African nations.
Why Manufactured Pandemics Will Continue
At this point, it's quite clear that "biosecurity" is the chosen means by which the globalist cabal intends to seize power over the world. The WHO is working on securing sole power over pandemic response globally through its international pandemic treaty which, if implemented, will eradicate the sovereignty of all member nations.
Ultimately, the WHO intends to dictate all health care. December 13, 2022, the WHO announced Sir Jeremy Farrar, head of the Wellcome Trust — who colluded with Dr. Anthony Fauci to suppress the COVID lab-leak narrative — has been chosen as its new chief scientist.11
The WHO's pandemic treaty is the gateway to a global, top-down totalitarian regime, a one world government. But to secure that power, they will need more pandemics. COVID-19 alone was not enough to get everyone onboard with a centralized pandemic response unit, and they probably knew that from the start.
So, the reason we can be sure there will be additional pandemics, whether manufactured using either fear and hype alone or an actual bioweapon created for this very purpose, is because the takeover plan, aka The Great Reset, is based on the premise that we need global biosecurity surveillance and centralized response.
Biosecurity, in turn, is the justification for an international vaccine passport, which the G20 just signed on to, and that passport will also be your digital identification. That digital ID, then, will be tied to your social credit score, personal carbon footprint tracker, medical records, educational records, work records, social media presence, purchase records, your bank accounts and a programmable central bank digital currency (CBDC).
Once all these pieces are fully connected, you'll be in a digital prison, and the ruling cabal — whether officially a one world government by then or not — will have total control over your life from cradle to grave.
COVID Is a Global Propaganda Operation]

https://rumble.com/vkppo0-covid-is-a-global-propaganda-operation.html

[Dr Piers Robinson is an expert on communication, media and world politics, focusing on conflict and war and especially the role of propaganda.
He is presently Co-Director of the Organisation for Propaganda Studies, Convenor of the Working Group on Syria, Propaganda and Media and Associated Researcher with the Working Group on Propaganda and the 9/11 'War on Terror’
From 2016 – 2019, he was Professor and Chair in Politics, Society and Political Journalism at the University of Sheffield.
Dr Robinson has served on the boards of several academic journals. He has lectured at the NATO Defense College in Rome and briefed senior UK military commanders and diplomats.
His Research interests focus on Organised Persuasive Communication and Contemporary Propaganda and his current projects include Propaganda and the Syrian conflict; Propaganda and the 9/11 Global War on Terror and Covid19.
Dr Robinson’s books include the Routledge Handbook of Media, Conflict and Security (2016), Pockets of Resistance: British news media, war and theory in the 2003 invasion of Iraq, (2010) and The CNN Effect: the myth of news, foreign policy and intervention.(2002).
Asia Pacific Today. August 4, 2021
Asia Pacific Today believes that your opinion is legitimate. And we believe that our guests have something to say and that their opinion is also legitimate. Throughout the week, Mike Ryan has discussions about politics, polarising issues, current events, and more. We really are connecting with people all over the world that simply speak their mind. There's new videos throughout the week, every week. And we also need our audience to grow. It would really help us grow if you could subscribe to our Channel.

In the video above,12,13 initially published in August 2021, professor Piers Robinson, Ph.D., an expert on communication, media, world politics and the role of propaganda, spoke to Asia Pacific Today about propaganda in the age of COVID.
As noted by Robinson, COVID-19 is unquestionably the largest, most sophisticated propaganda operation in history. Psychological techniques were extensively used during 2020 to incite fear in the population, while other persuasion strategies were used to get people to support and defend COVID measures such as masking, isolation, social distancing, lockdowns and jab mandates.
Indeed, propaganda is what allowed for draconian and unscientific COVID measures to be implemented. Without propaganda and simultaneous censorship of opposing views, little of what we've been through would have been possible.
As noted by Robinson, while the use of state propaganda could initially be justified as a necessary means to achieve a public health objective — protecting people from COVID-related illness and death — it quickly became apparent that this was not the case, and likely never was.
COVID-19 has instead been used to suspend and strip us of Constitutional rights and civil liberties, and is still being exploited to further social, political and financial restructuring objectives, entirely outside democratic processes and public scrutiny. We also know it's not about public health since:
* COVID is now nothing more than another endemic respiratory infection, much like the common cold, and
* The COVID jabs don't prevent infection or spread of the virus, which negates the entire premise for vaccine passports, yet they're being pushed anyway
How Did Gates Become the High Priest of the COVID Narrative?
In related news, Politico recently published a special report14 detailing how Gates, who has no medical expertise whatsoever, ended up controlling the global COVID response with no oversight to speak of.
In the earliest days of the pandemic, four nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) banded together to identify vaccine makers and make "targeted investments in the development of tests, treatments and shots," Politico explains.
These NGOs were the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Gavi (a Gates organization that provides vaccines to developing nations), the Wellcome Trust (a British research foundation led by Farrar, now selected to be the WHO's head scientist) and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), an international vaccine research and development group cofounded by Gates and Wellcome in 2017.
In collaboration with the WHO, these four NGOs — three of which were founded by Gates — then set out to create a global distribution plan for the tests, drugs and injections they'd invested in.
Incidentally, Gates at that time was also the largest donor to the WHO, as then-President Trump had pulled the U.S. out of the WHO and stopped funding. It's hard to imagine a situation with greater conflicts of interest. The four groups also greased the wheels of governments.
Collectively, they spent more than $8.3 million to lobby lawmakers and officials in the U.S. and Europe. A number of U.S. and EU officials, as well as WHO representatives, have also been employed by one or more of these NGOs, which helped solidify their political connections.
A number of civil society organizations that are active in developing countries, including Doctors Without Borders, have objected to Western-dominated groups making life-and-death decisions for poorer nations.
"'What makes Bill Gates qualified to be giving advice and advising the U.S. government on where they should be putting the tremendous resources?' asked Kate Elder, senior vaccines policy adviser for the Doctors Without Borders' Access Campaign," Politico writes.15
Self-Serving Consortium Is Running Our Pandemic Response
Politico's special report continues:16
"Now, critics are raising significant questions about the equity and effectiveness of the group's response to the pandemic — and the serious limitations of outsourcing the pandemic response to unelected, privately-funded groups. 'I think we should be deeply concerned,' said Lawrence Gostin, a Georgetown University professor who specializes in public-health law.
'Putting it in a very crass way, money buys influence. And this is the worst kind of influence. Not just because it's money — although that's important, because money shouldn't dictate policy — but also, because it's preferential access, behind closed doors.'
Gostin said that such power, even if propelled by good intentions and expertise, is 'anti-democratic, because it's extraordinarily non-transparent, and opaque' and 'leaves behind ordinary people, communities and civil society' …
[M]any global health specialists question whether the groups are capable of performing the rigorous post-mortems necessary to build a stronger global response system for the future.
'No one's actually holding these actors to account,' said Sophie Harman, professor of international politics at Queen Mary University of London. 'And they're the ones that are really shaping our ability to respond to pandemics' …
Without governments stepping in to take the lead on pandemic preparedness, the four organizations, along with their partners in the global health community, are the only entities that are in a position to lead in the world's response to a devastating outbreak — again.
'They're funded by their own capabilities and or endowments and trusts. But when they step into multilateral affairs, then who keeps watch over them?' a former senior U.S. official said. 'I don't know the answer to that. That's quite provocative.'"
Final Thoughts
So, in the final analysis, we already have a pseudo-one world government, in the form of Gates' NGOs. They are making health care decisions that should be left to individual nations and/or states, and they're making decisions that will line their own pockets, regardless of what happens to the public health-wise.
They coordinate and synchronize pandemic communication during these simulated practice runs, and then, when the real-world situation emerges that fits the bill, the preplanned script is simply played out verbatim.
African nations failed to follow the script during COVID, which is why they're focusing on African leaders in the latest simulation. They need to get rid of the African control group by getting them onboard with mass injection and all the rest. It's basically a recruitment effort.
Lastly, between the G20 declaration to implement an international vaccine passport under the auspice of the WHO, and the WHO's pandemic treaty, everything is lined up to take control of the next pandemic, and in so doing, further securing the foundation for a one world government.]

_______

Money, greed and the lust for power now trumps our overall health and well being. Evil thrives because good people refuse to confront it or even admit it exists.

__________
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@WalterF The document does state SEERS-25 was invented as a planning exercise.

I don't think anyone seriously thinks we won't have other illnesses appearing and going on world tours in the future. Just as they have in centuries past, and once here they stay even if slipping into the background.

Even the Black Death (Bubonic Plague) still kills a few people each year although it is very rare now, and unlike a virus disease can be treated with antibiotics - if caught early enough as it kills within just a few days.

We need be ready for them, but in open, honest ways.

Is that great long essay, Prescience - or no-science and lots of scare-mongering?
WalterF · 70-79, M
@ArishMell Certainly, scare-mongering is there, as it was from Day One of the Covid panic.

A scared population will be grateful to its government for appearing to protect it, by giving it solutions like very poorly tested vaccines, lockdown, masks... Even when these systems last for years, and are destructive in many ways, the people obey, gratefully.

They have thus been prepped for the next big one, which Gates announced, a year or so ago, with a chuckle, would REALLY hurt this time.

How did we deal with pandemics before 2019/20? By letting people use their common sense. Not shutting the whole of society down. But today, our nanny state doesn’t trust us with common sense. They prescribe, and proscribe, and impose. All in aid of their insane mantra "Nobody's safe till everybody's safe".

The pandemic preparedness policy previously prepared (excuse the consonance) by the UK government, a few years back, was reasonable. It was ignored for Covid. Because the big 4 NGOs had other ideas.

And look where we are now. We are in their hands, and going down and down
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@WalterF Now, you know the scaring I meant was that intended by that great long polemic about William Gates Esq. and his ilk!

Well, let's hope the national governments and international bodies have learnt from the Covid pandemic and can meet the next a lot more efficiently and without losing any humanity or costing too much side damage.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
I find it reassuring that the specialists will be able to analyse the situation as they should.

I am still here after 3 or is it now 4 inoculations, with different vaccines, and have not knowingly contracted Covid_SARS_19 ( as I have just learnt a couple I know, have); and I regard the risk of bad effects from the vaccines as far lower than the risk of a serious or even fatal case of the disease itself. I did lose a friend to it, although he was already ill.

However, it is right that the medical profession and statutory approvals boards around the world are allowed to do their work properly and openly. I wonder how much the FDA's desire for secrecy had far more to do with fear of their country's internal politics than with what it was established to do.
I haven't taken the "vaccine."
I'm concerned for those who have.
skybubble20 · 56-60, F
@PhoenixPhail same here.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
I don't have the time nor the interest to read all the documents that have been released so far. What I have seen is pretty damning. I am so glad that I did not get vaxed. From my personal circle of friends and family the vax is far far far deadlier than the virus. 4 dead from the vax. 0 dead from the virus.
Confined · 56-60, M
Ive not seen it. Where can we view it?
Lila15 · 22-25, F
@WalterF The media has no authority to force anyone to be vaccinated.

Has anyone done a study comparing populations from North America and Europe with populations in South America and Africa? It would be interesting to see if there are any differences since the vaccination rates are much higher in the first group than the second.
WalterF · 70-79, M
@Lila15 The media has no authority... Agreed, no formal authority, like for example what the police have.

But they have the powerful influence necessary to push people in the direction they want, by concerted wall-to-wall messaging, so constant and repetitive that most people end up believing them. Examples: the insane idea that "nobody's safe till everybody's safe" (by that reasoning, cars should be banned, as even one road accident would be too many). Etc, etc.

If the media are heavily funded by financiers requiring the propagation of a particular message, they will obey.

And the public, wanting to believe what their TV tells them, will follow meekly. And get injected.
Lila15 · 22-25, F
@WalterF The vaccine isn't perfect, but it seems to keep people from getting sicker than they otherwise would have. And you do have a point with the media. But you have to be really careful with the "alternative" media, where they're also pushing an agenda. I just watched "Died Suddenly," and it's completely transparent anti-vax propaganda that fails to provide any credible backup for its argument that the vaccine is causing weird blood clots.

I would want to see a peer-reviewed study comparing populations in the US and Europe with Africa and Latin America, which would highlight the differences between vaxed and unvaxed populations.
InHeaven · F
I didn’t take it, thank God but I feel sorry for those who have. My friend died of cancer last month, he himself told me that he thinks he developed it right after pfizer vaccine he took a year ago. Got esophagus cancer in 2021, in a year it metastasized into liver. Dead in a year.
Havesomefun2 · 56-60, M
Want till my forth jab I felt crap but it wasn’t Pfizer
WalterF · 70-79, M
@Havesomefun2 Much of a muchness, really. They all seem to have the same base
PhlipipUK · 70-79, MVIP
🥱🥱🥱🥱🥱🥱🥱🥱🥱

 
Post Comment