Fun
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Epic Double standards

Anyone who chants "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free," is apparently in denial about their antisemitism because the 'free' bit is taken to mean being in favour of genociding other people rather than wanting to be free from oppression. I guess there is an argument there that this can be interpreted a different way but - honestly - it's a stretch and often used in bad faith.

Meanwhile, Netanyahu explicitly rejects a two-state solution and says that he wants an Israeli state "from the river to the sea."

https://newrepublic.com/post/178243/benjamin-netanyahu-literally-says-from-the-river-to-the-sea

He is also leading a military campaign which is in the process of carrying out an actual genocide and actual ethnic cleansing, which is something that they all claim the famous chant is a hypothetical call for.

Hypocicy in CAPITAL LETTERS.
sarabee1995 · 26-30, F
Hmmm...

[quote][b][i]"From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,"[/i][/b][/quote]

Is it Hamas who said this? Or Israel?

There are Arab Palestinians who live in Gaza and there are Arab Palestinians who live in Israel. Right? Which ones are free?

Those who live in Israel make up 22% of the population. They are full citizens. They vote. They own businesses. They go to school. Attend university. Hold public office. They seem pretty free to me.

Those who live in Gaza live very different lives. Oh, this is due to Israeli oppression, you say? Gaza has received over twenty billion dollars in aid over the last twenty years, $5.2 billion from the US alone. This was enough that, with good governance, Gaza could be the Singapore of the Med today.

Arab Palestinians living in Gaza live under the oppressive thumb of Hamas. They are not free.

So, yes, from the river to the sea, all Arabs and all Jews and all Christians should be free from oppression living under a democratic government.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@SW-User I think that was really unfair.
@Burnley123 A complete mischaracterization of what I said. I have friends that are Muslim, Jewish, Christian, and non believers.
@Burnley123 I might have to just get off the web today. I was volunteering in my community to try to make myself feel better because my depression is kicking my ass and just came on for a second while I’m taking a lunch break. This was not the uplifting here I needed. And I can’t afford that with my mental state right now. Be safe and be well.
Bumbles · 51-55, M
I think each individual who uses the expression can be asked what they mean by it, but I do think using the term is reasonably understood to be more than just civil rights. The graphic of the phrase also lends itself to such an interpretation per the below

It’s not unusual to call for the elimination of Israel. Guitarman does. Being opposed to Zionism, which is common as well, would seem to call for the elimination of Israel, although I suppose someone could make an argument that Israel could still exist, but in some transformed version. I’ve grown so tired of the bad faith defense of “criticizing Israel is not anti-Semitic” as no reasonable person believes this, that making the charge is pointless and in fact, a distinction without a difference. Being against the existence of Israel is more the issue.

I don’t think it’s hypocritical to not support the opposite of one’s position, though. Or, to put it another way, if two people bid on a house, one person can’t charge the other person with hypocrisy for also wanting the house. I think the response to this may be "the Palestinians just want to share, not the whole thing." Well, we know that is not Hamas' position and they were the authority in Gaza. Now they will be underground and I assume suicide bombings will resume.

I used to be for a two stare solution, but now I think that is more of a slogan because it will never happen; neither side will compromise on the principal of “the right of return.” I do support a canton like existence for the West Bank and the elimination of all settlements. Come to think of it, that will never happen, either.

Bumbles · 51-55, M
@LordShadowfire I think Hamas should be attacked wherever they are in Gaza, too. If the facts on the ground change or if there is evidence of an actual plan that is enacted, I will reconsider. In the meantime it's a tragedy and there are horrible casualties among the Palestinians. But I can't get anywhere close to a conclusion of genocide with a 2% death rate where those deaths are happening in the middle of war to eliminate a legitimate military target.

There may be instances of murder, or perhaps the response was disproportionate, or the rules of engagement too loose, all fair arguments and justice should prevail against murderers. None of that means genocide.
@Bumbles [quote]I think Hamas should be attacked wherever they are in Gaza, too.[/quote]
Okay, but that's different from attacking all of Gaza. And I can't imagine you don't see that that's his goal.

Here's an article talking about his speech referencing the Bible story of the genocide in Amalek:

https://www.commondreams.org/news/netanyahu-genocide
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
GlitterEater · 36-40, F
Anyone still siding with Israel just doesn't want to admit they were tricked.
@GlitterEater At least they got the general area. The US just attacked any and all neighboring countries, from Afghanistan to Iraq.
GlitterEater · 36-40, F
@LordShadowfire Okay, but the analogy makes sense to you, right?
@GlitterEater Yeah, it does. Israel is using the Hamas attack as an excuse to attack the whole region, and killing civilians and others who had nothing to do with it, which is fucked, and right-whingers in my country call me a Nazi for saying so.
SW-User
What started the current conflict? I'm sure we'll have different answers but that's just because you're so predictable a left wing echo chamber not a single thought you've formed without influence
@SW-User it you are taking this conflict in isolation then you can pinpoint this to the horrific Oct 7 attack. However even so Israel lost the moral high ground weeks ago.

In truth....what has led to this is 75 years of conflict and an unwillingness to live in peace
Yeah... I think you're thinking way too much into this.

Regardless of what the phrase might have meant at some point in history, it's relevance can mean something different today - and between individual chanters, too. One guy could say that he wants Palestine free from war while another woman might say that she wants Palestine free from invaders.

Closer to home, we still have football fans chanting about the World Wars when England face Germany at the World Cup - but no one cares about that being in bad taste and making a mockery of all the lives we lost.
calicuz · 51-55, M
First I'd like your opinion: Can a Semite be an Antisemite?
@calicuz No. As I said, the 1900 edition of The Century Dictionary.

calicuz · 51-55, M
@flipper1966

Ok, then they need to explain why their research didn't lead them to understand that Arabs are Semites as well, and should have been included in the definition of what Antisemitism is.
@calicuz In the late 19th century I don't think Europeans gave much thought to Arabs. They were a negligible presence in Europe at that time. As I say the word anti-Semitism was coined in Germany as a more scientific sounding word than Jew hater. At that time Europeans had no concern for Arab haters. I think the term you're looking for is anti-Arab.

According to WHO there is not a single hospital surviving in Gaza. How is this not a crime against humanity?
Not. A. Single. One. There were 34.
Friday the ICJ will rule on the preliminary genocide relief petition filed by South Africa. Can't wait!!
@Burnley123 Like waiting for the surgeon to come out of the operating room with news of your family member. That kind of excited.
@flipper1966 even if they rule in favour of South Africa it will not change anything. It will not give cause for a ceasefire
@InOtterWords At this time the ICJ will only be ruling on interim relief. The final ruling on whether Israel is committing genocide is still years down the road.
I am not fan of Netanyahu and settler expansion. That does not mean Hamas was in any way even close to justified but I pray that Netanyahu‘a group is finished there and cooler heads can soon prevail.
Ynotisay · M
It's like "Black Lives Matter." A catchy, aspirational phrase that can be interpreted differently depending on perspective.
SW-User
Both sides are as crazy, hate filled and inflexible as the other. There will never be peace there.
@SW-User They both have a death grip on Palestine and won't give in to any compromise. They are both like dogs who have a jaw grip on a bone. Ever try to get a bone out of a dog's jaws? Good luck.
lumberjackslam · 41-45, M
thats just one man, who shouldn't be running the show any longer.

edit: that doesn't mean can abide by the saying when it's used by mobs,just that I don't support him. Israel needs a new leader to protect its borders
@lumberjackslam 🖤🖤🙏
I think there should be two states. It's a compromise.
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
Go Bibi! Lol
I'm opposed to both sides doing ethnic cleansing and war crimes.
@LordShadowfire THIS!!!!!!

 
Post Comment