Top | Newest First | Oldest First
View 1 more replies »
BlueVeins · 22-25
ViciDraco · 36-40, M
@BlueVeins If the US attacked North Korea, the South couldn't just sit back and watch the fireworks... they would be under them. The sad thing is, that even if the South wanted to help the North, the North would open fire on the South before they could even react to a US strike.
BlueVeins · 22-25
@ViciDraco Not if the US attacked from the east, amphibiously. If South Korea disapproved of the invasion, North Korea would have no reason to attack them. In fact, it'd be the dumbest thing they could possibly do in that situation, and most analysts believe that the regime is rational.
SW-User
@SW-User maybe not even the most corrupt, if you would like it to be different, but it certainly is close by the mark
SW-User
@SW-User There are some real shit holes of autocracy and horrific human rights abuses. America fails by its own standards, but at least it has them 🙂
SW-User
I would hope that a decision to preemptively strike the north would be the result of a verifiable and immediate threat against the US mainland or south Korea..
In either case war would be the result and the South would be in grave danger.. without the support of America they would be outgunned.. supporting the North would be to surrender to the north..
And Japan??? They shouldn't even be in the equation..
In either case war would be the result and the South would be in grave danger.. without the support of America they would be outgunned.. supporting the North would be to surrender to the north..
And Japan??? They shouldn't even be in the equation..
Classified · M
sarabee1995 · 26-30, F
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
SW-User
@ViciDraco hahaha Kind if what I'm thinking
