This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
BlueVeins · 22-25
There's a lot to digest about this survey...

SW-User
@BlueVeins Tell me hahaha I want to hear
BlueVeins · 22-25
@SW-User
-"Attack Japan", as you said
-No option to just sit back and watch the fucking fireworks
-No diplomatic or humanitarian option
-FORTY-SEVEN PERCENT support for helping an ethno-Communist dictatorship that threatens to glass their capital city every other Tuesday
-"Attack Japan", as you said
-No option to just sit back and watch the fucking fireworks
-No diplomatic or humanitarian option
-FORTY-SEVEN PERCENT support for helping an ethno-Communist dictatorship that threatens to glass their capital city every other Tuesday
ViciDraco · 41-45, M
@BlueVeins If the US attacked North Korea, the South couldn't just sit back and watch the fireworks... they would be under them. The sad thing is, that even if the South wanted to help the North, the North would open fire on the South before they could even react to a US strike.
BlueVeins · 22-25
@ViciDraco Not if the US attacked from the east, amphibiously. If South Korea disapproved of the invasion, North Korea would have no reason to attack them. In fact, it'd be the dumbest thing they could possibly do in that situation, and most analysts believe that the regime is rational.