Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

People making an argument that the cost of nuclear power could fund every private property in Australia getting solar + batteries

Why should Australian private property owners be forced/coerced into accepting solar ( with batteries) to make their house into a grid battery if they do not want to? Why can't property owners get solar (with batteries) and explicitly block/bar 'exporting' of electricity (either willingly or against their will)?

Same as why should EV drivers be forced/coerced into allowing their EV when plugged into to charge instead (via V2G) being used as a grid battery?

Why should Australian private property owners be forced/coerced into getting a 'smart' meter which will be used by governement, electricity grid operators, etc. to control your household power usage against your will.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
be\cause if not forced, i am afraid very few will consent. there are ways to encourage involvement that might not need the word, must!