Top | Newest First | Oldest First
sunriselover · M
Christianity is the inverse of what you have said
Everything radiates from the efficacy of the Cross.
We have freedom from the subjection of The Law.
Everything radiates from the efficacy of the Cross.
We have freedom from the subjection of The Law.
View 19 more replies »
@sunriselover
I won't.😁
And ask yourself if your approach is likely to convince anyone to "keep searchin" lol
I won't.😁
And ask yourself if your approach is likely to convince anyone to "keep searchin" lol
sunriselover · M
@Pikachu it certainly has challenged you though.
@sunriselover
lol no. My dude. *face palm*
It literally has not because there's nothing to take you up on.
You've said nothing, you've communicated nothing. I even explained to you that you weren't communicating effectively and you just tucked your tail and gave up.
Again, ask yourself if your approach is likely to convince anyone to "keep searchin" lol
lol no. My dude. *face palm*
It literally has not because there's nothing to take you up on.
You've said nothing, you've communicated nothing. I even explained to you that you weren't communicating effectively and you just tucked your tail and gave up.
Again, ask yourself if your approach is likely to convince anyone to "keep searchin" lol
Tastyfrzz · 61-69, M
Typically, anything related to sex and/or female monthly bodily functions.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
LordShadowfire · 100+, M
All human morality is subjective. Not only that, it's very anthropocentric.
Think about it. What's the one thing an animal, wild or domestic, can do that will guarantee its death? Kill a human. Why? Because we make the rules. If a dog kills another dog, nobody bats an eye. Sometimes there's consequences for the murderer dog, but for the most part, people just move on. But let that dog kill a human, and it's a death sentence. Instant.
As for the rest of the rules? Again, anthropocentric. Don't steal, unless you're stealing from an animal, then it's okay. Don't assault people, but you can assault an animal. On and on down the line.
Think about it. What's the one thing an animal, wild or domestic, can do that will guarantee its death? Kill a human. Why? Because we make the rules. If a dog kills another dog, nobody bats an eye. Sometimes there's consequences for the murderer dog, but for the most part, people just move on. But let that dog kill a human, and it's a death sentence. Instant.
As for the rest of the rules? Again, anthropocentric. Don't steal, unless you're stealing from an animal, then it's okay. Don't assault people, but you can assault an animal. On and on down the line.
Renaci · 36-40
It's subjective. It's subjective to whatever gets gods rocks off at any given moment. Like eating bacon doesn't kill God. So the whole kosher laws are just his subjective wants.
Or more likely Moses had such bad OCD that he was psychotic with and put his caloric restrictions/tainted foods compulsion on everyone else.
As someone with OCD I can see a lot of OCD in Moses.
But yeah sin is just another word for making God mad. It's not about what's good for us. And it's not about what is good for God. It's about what make the narcissist happy. Thus religious morality is the ultimate in subjectivity.
Or more likely Moses had such bad OCD that he was psychotic with and put his caloric restrictions/tainted foods compulsion on everyone else.
As someone with OCD I can see a lot of OCD in Moses.
But yeah sin is just another word for making God mad. It's not about what's good for us. And it's not about what is good for God. It's about what make the narcissist happy. Thus religious morality is the ultimate in subjectivity.