This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
1354swrdt · 70-79, M
Just like you to misunderstand a verse of scripture taken out of context! 😃😃😃
1354swrdt · 70-79, M
Yes but the point is we must understand the context the get the point. Meat sold in the markets in those days was likely to have been offered to idols before being sold which posed a problem of faith for some Christians. Now Paul tells them that as ‘an idol is nothing’ to go ahead and eat but if their faith will not allow it to refrain as it would be sin for them to do so as a violation of conscience.
A modern example think of Chariots of Fire movie. Eric Liddell was brought up a strict sabbatarian - to play games on a Sunday was wrong. Now Christians today might have a more relaxed view but for Liddell it would have been a sin to run on Sundays even in the Olympics. Of course, we know the story!
Getting on to meat the Bible tells us it is fine to eat meat. But if a Christian believes it is wrong then of course he should refrain and we respect him. And btw we do believe in animal welfare. I do not personally eat black pudding Genesis 9:4 @Pikachu
A modern example think of Chariots of Fire movie. Eric Liddell was brought up a strict sabbatarian - to play games on a Sunday was wrong. Now Christians today might have a more relaxed view but for Liddell it would have been a sin to run on Sundays even in the Olympics. Of course, we know the story!
Getting on to meat the Bible tells us it is fine to eat meat. But if a Christian believes it is wrong then of course he should refrain and we respect him. And btw we do believe in animal welfare. I do not personally eat black pudding Genesis 9:4 @Pikachu
@1354swrdt
Sorry, in this case the appeal to context of the time doesn't help because again, modern Christians are not worried about eating meat offered to idols and therefore this cannot be the true meaning of writing if indeed it is meant to kind Christians even to this day.
[quote]. But if a Christian believes it is wrong then of course he should refrain and we respect him.[/quote]
lol yup. That's what i said. But additionally if you don't think what you're doing is right and you do it anyway then you're being a bad Christian.
The question stands.
Sorry, in this case the appeal to context of the time doesn't help because again, modern Christians are not worried about eating meat offered to idols and therefore this cannot be the true meaning of writing if indeed it is meant to kind Christians even to this day.
[quote]. But if a Christian believes it is wrong then of course he should refrain and we respect him.[/quote]
lol yup. That's what i said. But additionally if you don't think what you're doing is right and you do it anyway then you're being a bad Christian.
The question stands.
LordShadowfire · 100+, M
1354swrdt · 70-79, M
What tired old tactic. Won’t stop people like you continuing in your ignorance either@LordShadowfire
@LordShadowfire
Evidently not lol
Evidently not lol
@1354swrdt lol my last post in the discussion was about the meaning of the passage.
Your response was personal criticism lol
Sorry, I can't take seriously a grown man who responds with " I know you are but what am [i]iiii[/i]?!"
But you've made it clear that you're finished with the discussion so I'll leave you to your mean-spirited posturing😊
Your response was personal criticism lol
Sorry, I can't take seriously a grown man who responds with " I know you are but what am [i]iiii[/i]?!"
But you've made it clear that you're finished with the discussion so I'll leave you to your mean-spirited posturing😊
1354swrdt · 70-79, M
Sorry that you cannot take any form of argument without responding to it with self
Righteous indignation. But that is your p
nature to respond with that kind of posturing and accusation. You really are hopeless at conducting a rational discussion. The problem is when the discussion gets too near the bone you feel threatened and flight @Pikachu
Righteous indignation. But that is your p
nature to respond with that kind of posturing and accusation. You really are hopeless at conducting a rational discussion. The problem is when the discussion gets too near the bone you feel threatened and flight @Pikachu
LordShadowfire · 100+, M
@1354swrdt Look who's talking, Mr. Ad Hominem Attack.
1354swrdt · 70-79, M
Look at what you have written and see who is making ad hominem attacks 😃@LordShadowfire
LordShadowfire · 100+, M
@1354swrdt Still you. You accused me of being a communist because I don't believe in your particular god. You're also guilty of the poisoning the well fallacy.
1354swrdt · 70-79, M
I didn’t accuse you of being a communist I just gave you an example of the glories of atheism. With all you’re having and puffing he just cannot seem to get any sense at all@LordShadowfire