Should Congress pass a law banning time travel to the past?
And before you go saying there’s no need since that can’t happen, keep in mind they have already added the Lake Champlain Monster to the endangered species list just in case it exists.
Top | Newest First | Oldest First
View 8 more replies »
Zaphod42 · 46-50, M
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@DocSavage I feel like we're both saying the same thing. The two timelines wouldn't ever come into contact. You would basically travel into a new one.
DocSavage · M
@LordShadowfire
Hard to say. I’ve read a bunch of science fiction dealing with time travel. As I said before the rules are iffy. In some cases the timelines never meet, but are similar. In others they’re fluid, and can change when events are altered. Then there always the idea that time is constant, and takes all events into account regardless, so there is never a change. Until we actually see a T.A.R.D.I.S we’ll just have to go with timey winey, as the Doctor says.
Hard to say. I’ve read a bunch of science fiction dealing with time travel. As I said before the rules are iffy. In some cases the timelines never meet, but are similar. In others they’re fluid, and can change when events are altered. Then there always the idea that time is constant, and takes all events into account regardless, so there is never a change. Until we actually see a T.A.R.D.I.S we’ll just have to go with timey winey, as the Doctor says.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M