Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

C S Lewis on atheism

“Atheism turns out to be too simple. If the whole universe has no meaning, we should never have found out that it has no meaning: just as, if there were no light in the universe and therefore no creatures with eyes, we should never know it was dark. Dark would be without meaning.”

C. S. Lewis
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
“[R]eligion was the race's first (and worst) attempt to make sense of reality. It was the best the species could do at a time when we had no concept of physics, chemistry, biology or medicine. We did not know that we lived on a round planet, let alone that the said planet was in orbit in a minor and obscure solar system, which was also on the edge of an unimaginably vast cosmos that was exploding away from its original source of energy. We did not know that micro-organisms were so powerful and lived in our digestive systems in order to enable us to live, as well as mounting lethal attacks on us as parasites. We did not know of our close kinship with other animals. We believed that sprites, imps, demons, and djinns were hovering in the air about us. We imagined that thunder and lightning were portentous. It has taken us a long time to shrug off this heavy coat of ignorance and fear, and every time we do there are self-interested forces who want to compel us to put it back on again.”
― Christopher Hitchens, The Portable Atheist: Essential Readings for the Nonbeliever
Mathers · 61-69
I don’t think anybody with any sense takes Christopher Hitchens writings too seriously. The God he hates is not the God I worship thankfully@BlueSkyKing
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
val70 · 51-55
@BlueSkyKing And then we were without him. Don't miss him, just the intelligence that he had. He won't miss me nor you either. That was the man alright
Sharon · F
@Mathers
I don’t think anybody with any sense takes Christopher Hitchens writings too seriously.
Typical christian hubris. Just insult anyone who doesn't buy into your BS.
Mathers · 61-69
Typical atheist comment of nil intelligence@Sharon
Sharon · F
@Mathers It's the same every time, christians always end up resorting to childish insults. It's a variation of Godwin's Law (q.v.).
Mathers · 61-69
When it comes to childish insults you lead the way@Sharon
Sharon · F
@Mathers LOL. Anyone can see it was you who resorted to childish insults. The evidence is clear. and your lies can't change that.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
Mathers · 61-69
You are so boring and predictable in your non-arguments@LordShadowfire
@Mathers CS Lewis was a good fiction writer, but a terrible philosopher. Anyone who takes “Mere Christianity” seriously is letting their love of the Narnia series get in the way of rational thought. Lewis’ Trilemma is so asinine as to not be worthy of criticism.
@val70 I miss Hitch. His commentary on the Trump years would have been amazing.
Mathers · 61-69
Interesting so you think that similar greatest scientists like Francis Collins who are deeply influenced by the book are asinine? They are to your mighty brain ! 😂@LeopoldBloom
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
badminton · 61-69, MVIP
@jshm2 Ad Hominem Fallacy (Attacking the person): This fallacy occurs when, instead of addressing someone's argument or position, you attack the person or some aspect of the person who is making the argument. The fallacious attack can also be direct to membership in a group or institution.
val70 · 51-55
@val70 @LeopoldBloom My argument against Christopher Hitchens is as simple as my argument against General Lee during and after the Battle of the Crater near Petersburg. He could have denouced Buckley but he didn't, moreover, he actually sew him together with Gore Vidal. Both were isolationists, sure, but Buckley was sure the vilain when he debated Baldwin at Oxford and he didn't even follow his brother demanding Nixon to resign either. I admire Hitchens's intellect but his moral positioning was wrong concerning that and other things too. Too little time and space to deal with them here
@val70 He disappointed me when he supported the Iraq War. I suspect that had a lot to do with Saddam's gratuitous embracing of radical Islam. But just because I disagreed with Hitch didn't mean I couldn't enjoy his wit and insights.
LordShadowfire · 46-50, M
@Mathers
You are so boring and predictable in your non-arguments
val70 · 51-55
@LeopoldBloom I enjoyed Hitch too, but I wasn't found of him. The man was way too intelligent to not know what his utterances were going to peceived as. He won't have liked me, nor many of the people that I know. For example, he wrote that in the week straight after Princess Diana was killed in the Paris car crash that Britain became a "one-party state". Obviously I didn't nor should he have said it because it isn't constructive nor visionary. We all know that we lack those last ones now. We're in a mess that people like Hitch helped create