Creative
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Victorian Era paintings had so much cultural significance and beautiful stories incorporated into them

AntisocialTroll · 56-60, F
Lorena Bobbit obviously wasn't the first then.
DrWatson · 70-79, M
This is not Victorian. It is from "Le livre des échecs amoureux moralisés" , from the year 1401.

And I agree that the post should be tagged Adult.
Why isn't this marked as adult?
matthewjames · 18-21, M
cause anyone can look at a painting@littlepuppywantanewlife
@matthewjames If it’s an adult themed painting, it still should be marked "adult" to keep it out of feeds with "non-adult" settings.
Degbeme · 70-79, M
Well that made my eyes water.
TexChik · F
OFF with his...junk?
SW-User
@TexChik At least we have culture in England.
Degbeme · 70-79, M
@TexChik It looks like she is paying them in potatoes. 🤭
TexChik · F
@Degbeme Hell hath no fury....
ArishMell · 70-79, M
I don't know the painting and its date, but it is obviously Mediaeval (pre-Renaissance), not Victorian (mid to end 19C).

The clothes and the distorted perspective are the immediate give-away.

Less obviously, Mediaeval artists were not afraid to portray graphic violence in what were generally violent times.

They also tended to think everyone had always dressed as they, the artists and contemporaries, did; as you see in Mediaeval depictions of Biblical characters.

There were many Victorian painters and photographers of sexual subjects, using contemporary clothes or fashions from Classical times according to the subject. The subject here seems too cruel and graphic for Victorians, too, who preferred their erotica and indeed pornography to be romantic and idyllic; in home, rural or Classical Mythical settings.
jackson55 · M
That’s a beautiful story ?
matthewjames · 18-21, M
whats the story about?@jackson55
jackson55 · M
@matthewjames You tell me.
Wtf is going on there ? Lol
Piffy · 22-25, F
@NaughtyPickle whatever was going on, he's about to have a bad day 😅
matthewjames · 18-21, M
thanks for the heart Ms Piffy :)
DunningKruger · 61-69, M
That's from the Renaissance.
matthewjames · 18-21, M
that looks scary
@matthewjames close your eyes
SW-User
@SW-User can't unsee it. 😤
SW-User
A strange choice for a Victorian Painting.

If it was PreRafaelite I would understand
DrWatson · 70-79, M
@SW-User It's from 1401.
Medieval rather than Victorian.
Victorian era: 1840ish to 1900 - when Queen Victoria, it's namesake reigned .

This isnt Victorian .
Piffy · 22-25, F
@OogieBoogie I love going online spreading misinformation
SW-User
Try this one[image deleted]
@SW-User Victorian (Pre-Raphaelite) with a medieval theme
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@SW-User Artist & title?
PinkRose23 · 22-25, F
But this is from a [i]medieval[/i] manuscript, not a Victorian painting

When you see the [i]uncropped[/i] image it is a medieval reimagining of the Greek myth of Cronos
TheRascallyOne · 31-35, M

 
Post Comment