Top | Newest First | Oldest First
AntisocialTroll · 56-60, F
Lorena Bobbit obviously wasn't the first then.
DrWatson · 70-79, M
This is not Victorian. It is from "Le livre des échecs amoureux moralisés" , from the year 1401.
And I agree that the post should be tagged Adult.
And I agree that the post should be tagged Adult.
littlepuppywantanewlife · 31-35, M
Why isn't this marked as adult?
matthewjames · 18-21, M
cause anyone can look at a painting@littlepuppywantanewlife
bijouxbroussard · F
@matthewjames If it’s an adult themed painting, it still should be marked "adult" to keep it out of feeds with "non-adult" settings.
Degbeme · 70-79, M
Well that made my eyes water.
TexChik · F
OFF with his...junk?
SW-User
@TexChik At least we have culture in England.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
I don't know the painting and its date, but it is obviously Mediaeval (pre-Renaissance), not Victorian (mid to end 19C).
The clothes and the distorted perspective are the immediate give-away.
Less obviously, Mediaeval artists were not afraid to portray graphic violence in what were generally violent times.
They also tended to think everyone had always dressed as they, the artists and contemporaries, did; as you see in Mediaeval depictions of Biblical characters.
There were many Victorian painters and photographers of sexual subjects, using contemporary clothes or fashions from Classical times according to the subject. The subject here seems too cruel and graphic for Victorians, too, who preferred their erotica and indeed pornography to be romantic and idyllic; in home, rural or Classical Mythical settings.
The clothes and the distorted perspective are the immediate give-away.
Less obviously, Mediaeval artists were not afraid to portray graphic violence in what were generally violent times.
They also tended to think everyone had always dressed as they, the artists and contemporaries, did; as you see in Mediaeval depictions of Biblical characters.
There were many Victorian painters and photographers of sexual subjects, using contemporary clothes or fashions from Classical times according to the subject. The subject here seems too cruel and graphic for Victorians, too, who preferred their erotica and indeed pornography to be romantic and idyllic; in home, rural or Classical Mythical settings.
jackson55 · M
That’s a beautiful story ?
matthewjames · 18-21, M
whats the story about?@jackson55
jackson55 · M
@matthewjames You tell me.
NaughtyPickle · M
Wtf is going on there ? Lol
Piffy · 22-25, F
@NaughtyPickle whatever was going on, he's about to have a bad day 😅
matthewjames · 18-21, M
thanks for the heart Ms Piffy :)
matthewjames · 18-21, M
that looks scary
littlepuppywantanewlife · 31-35, M
@matthewjames close your eyes
DunningKruger · 61-69, M
That's from the Renaissance.
SW-User
Ouch.
littlepuppywantanewlife · 31-35, M
@SW-User can't unsee it. 😤
Oh man
SW-User
A strange choice for a Victorian Painting.
If it was PreRafaelite I would understand
If it was PreRafaelite I would understand
DrWatson · 70-79, M
@SW-User It's from 1401.
OogieBoogie · F
Victorian era: 1840ish to 1900 - when Queen Victoria, it's namesake reigned .
This isnt Victorian .
This isnt Victorian .
Piffy · 22-25, F
@OogieBoogie I love going online spreading misinformation
SW-User
Try this one
[image/video deleted]
LamontCranston · M
@SW-User Victorian (Pre-Raphaelite) with a medieval theme
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@SW-User Artist & title?
LamontCranston · M
Medieval rather than Victorian.
PinkRose23 · 22-25, F
Very true
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
OMG
TheRascallyOne · 31-35, M
[image/video - please log in to see this content]