When is Hillary Clinton going to be charged with a crime?

@FreeSpirit1 😂😂😂🤣🤣

@Harley4Life So, you are inhumane?

@MarkPaul no im not and again what the hell does that have to do with the question

@Harley4Life The conversation at some point took a turn. That's how conversations work. Even you must know that.

@HerKing good. glad you got something right.

@akindheart Sarcasm is lost on some people...🙄

@HerKing you are right. i don't deal with innuendos or sarcasm...or stupid emojis

@MichaelJT

@TheeOriginalEXLover so we have you to thank for this shitstorm? Well done!

@TexChik The dimwits are going to be very surprised come November. I won't say why on here.

[@😮. Pm me 😁

@TexChik I meant to a hour ago but youknow, stuff gets i the way. will do though.

@windinhishair not charging Mrs Clinton keeps her in a disgrace of permanent disgrace. Quite ideal.

@jackjjackson I can't believe that even you would believe something like that.

@nudistsueaz Yep, the laws apply to everyone except dumbocrats.

@beckyromero

[quote]Well, yes, that's a more general statement about the disconnect between high-ranking government officials and the rest of us.

Some people just think it's because of her being Hillary. I disagree.

Others did the same thing and didn't go to jail.
[/quote]

Yes, and there has always been a "political" component ...

John Allen and David Petraeus didn't exactly get a walk, and their offenses seem minor by comparison to what HRC seems to be getting away with.

Clinton's NSA advisor Sandy Burger stuffed classified documents in his socks to sneak they out of the national archives and he never confessed to what exactly he took. For that he was fined $50,000, sentenced to serve two years of probation and 100 hours of community service. What he stole is still a deep dark secret.

@Heartlander Exactly.

@Heartlander that was without a doubt planned. and when sessions threatened the president that if rosenstein goes, he goes. i would have said dont' let the door hit you in the ass.

@eli1601 this is one of the funniest things I have read today. Not going to happen.

@akindheart sessions is an interesting character. He did the right thing by recusing, and by and large, he and Rosenstein have let Mueller run the investigation the way he wants to. But invoking the Bible to separate families and imprison children is a bit of a stretch, so he loses points there.

@Graylight mishandling classified information is what makes it illegal. I say that because I did have a clearance when I was active duty and I know the punishment I would have received had I had classified material on an unclassified system. That is not policy that is the law and has been such from at least the 90s when I enlisted. The part most people don't understand about classified material is the handling aspect of it which is how must get themselves in trouble.

What I did read was that she had material of at least the Secret level. What is absolutely ridiculous with the way the government works is if you have just one item of classified material on a computer, the entire computer is now classified at that level.

Not trying to split any hairs here just giving a bit of background info

@Graylight one other thing is that certain documents can be shredded if done in the proper manner PROVIDED they meet the criteria for destruction

not charging Mrs Clinton keeps her in a disgrace of permanent disgrace. Quite ideal. @Graylight @Scubaguy027

@katielass even clapper is saying the Mueller investigation needs to stop. makes me wonder...getting too close to him?

@TheeOriginalEXLover stop the name calling and give us an intelligent argument. Not too much to ask.

@TheeOriginalEXLover @Gwangi

@jackjjackson thank you, sheriff Jack!

@akindheart Not exactly, about Strzok...there was malice but no evidence of an overt illegal act toward that goal. You and I can complain and talk about not letting Hillary be elected and it isn't a crime until someone can prove we actually did something toward that end that was illegal. We don't have thought police YET, no matter how badly some would love to make it a crime to not agree with them.

Unprofessional, of course, destroying of the image of the agency, yes, fabricating evidence, quashing or hiding evidence, taking steps toward blocking the election, no way.

Should he and others be fired for that type of behavior, removed from sensitive posts? Sure. A crime is an entirely different matter. I worked in investigations and while I often had disagreements with those I worked with and for, and might of taken a little satisfaction in seeing someone get jammed up, that alone isn't a crime. Not unless I take it further...and someone has to prove that I did. That is what is lacking in the Strzok/Page mess. They may have done more, but all we have evidence of is an illicit affair between two employees who really disliked a candidate running for president. We need more evidence to convict them of any crime and the IG didn't find it.

@akindheart [quote]he posted the texts that clearly say we are not going to let him win yet there was no malice???[/quote]

FBI agent shows off to his partner in hide the sausage...The other FBI agents didn't get the memo clearly.

@bowman81 i understand your position but Strzok was in aposition of authority, had malice, talked about an insurance policy to make sure it would not happen AND there was the Vive La Resistance message. it might be circumstantial but clearly not professional. He needs to go with Rosenstein right behind him.

@TheeOriginalEXLover [quote]you makes you sound like a retard![/quote]


Really? Now in English.

@TheeOriginalEXLover [quote]I don't know what is more sad that she had sex with him or that she thought she was saying AMERICA, but we never cared. Bill had sex in the oval office, his party never impeached him and now [b]they want us to not elect him.[/b] I find it pathetic that you think I care, I don't give a fuck[/quote]

Clinton was impeached though. And he can't be re-elected as POTUS, he did his 8 years.

@DonaldTrumpet see above

@Graylight

@DonaldTrumpet Ow, good burn.

@Ramon67 I was thrilled to see that poor guy who took a pic of himself in the submarine and sent to his gf pardoned by Mr. Trump. That was a political prosecution by the odumbo admin. if I ever saw one. Scooter Libby, too.

@katielass I agree with you . That administration was corrupt .

@Ramon67 For sure.

@SW-User if it was Donald Trump would you care? The fact remains is that she broke the law and needs to be held accountable as should any lawbreaker

@Harley4Life who gives a shit about Trump either.

@SW-User Apparently the left wing media. They talk about nothing else. Like a broken record.

not charging Mrs Clinton keeps her in a disgrace of permanent disgrace. Quite ideal. @eli1601