When is Hillary Clinton going to be charged with a crime?
The IG report itself said she had classified information on her private server. That is illegal as all hell.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
akindheart · 61-69, F
@bowman81 i heard that. the whole report was contradictory. he posted the texts that clearly say we are not going to let him win yet there was no malice???
bowman81 · M
@akindheart Not exactly, about Strzok...there was malice but no evidence of an overt illegal act toward that goal. You and I can complain and talk about not letting Hillary be elected and it isn't a crime until someone can prove we actually did something toward that end that was illegal. We don't have thought police YET, no matter how badly some would love to make it a crime to not agree with them.
Unprofessional, of course, destroying of the image of the agency, yes, fabricating evidence, quashing or hiding evidence, taking steps toward blocking the election, no way.
Should he and others be fired for that type of behavior, removed from sensitive posts? Sure. A crime is an entirely different matter. I worked in investigations and while I often had disagreements with those I worked with and for, and might of taken a little satisfaction in seeing someone get jammed up, that alone isn't a crime. Not unless I take it further...and someone has to prove that I did. That is what is lacking in the Strzok/Page mess. They may have done more, but all we have evidence of is an illicit affair between two employees who really disliked a candidate running for president. We need more evidence to convict them of any crime and the IG didn't find it.
Unprofessional, of course, destroying of the image of the agency, yes, fabricating evidence, quashing or hiding evidence, taking steps toward blocking the election, no way.
Should he and others be fired for that type of behavior, removed from sensitive posts? Sure. A crime is an entirely different matter. I worked in investigations and while I often had disagreements with those I worked with and for, and might of taken a little satisfaction in seeing someone get jammed up, that alone isn't a crime. Not unless I take it further...and someone has to prove that I did. That is what is lacking in the Strzok/Page mess. They may have done more, but all we have evidence of is an illicit affair between two employees who really disliked a candidate running for president. We need more evidence to convict them of any crime and the IG didn't find it.
HerKing · 61-69, M
@akindheart [quote]he posted the texts that clearly say we are not going to let him win yet there was no malice???[/quote]
FBI agent shows off to his partner in hide the sausage...The other FBI agents didn't get the memo clearly.
FBI agent shows off to his partner in hide the sausage...The other FBI agents didn't get the memo clearly.
akindheart · 61-69, F
@bowman81 i understand your position but Strzok was in aposition of authority, had malice, talked about an insurance policy to make sure it would not happen AND there was the Vive La Resistance message. it might be circumstantial but clearly not professional. He needs to go with Rosenstein right behind him.