Top | Newest First | Oldest First
kodiac · 22-25, M
I keep asking this question and never getting an answer. Take city like los Angeles a million people all driving electric cars. What happens at the end of the day and all of them plug in their cars at the same time? Also people ignore the fact that it takes as much fossil fuels to produce the cars as it does to produce gasoline.
View 20 more replies »
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
Bingo. Do you think our friend here will ever get his head out of Biden’s ass? @Patriot96
Zeusdelight · 61-69, M
@Patriot96 Have you any figures to back that statement up?
SW-User
@Zeusdelight Of course he has. He has many many memes 🤣
SW-User
Wow, yes I'm going to trust anything from an extreme-right, climate change denying source whose factual reporting is at best questionable. The myriad Branco cartoons simply reinforce my point.
I have an EV. It costs me approximately 1/3 of what my old diesel car cost to run.
I have an EV. It costs me approximately 1/3 of what my old diesel car cost to run.
This message was deleted by its author.
SW-User
@SandWitch prove it.
This message was deleted by its author.
ElwoodBlues · M
That's a bulllshitt biased study. It asks
Funny thing, that biased study fails to ask the same question about the decades of subsidies the oil industry and automobile industry have received and continue to receive.
Another funny thing, that study fails to measure the costs of pumping all that CO2 into our atmosphere.
Here's a nice apples-to-apples comparison. There are many like it online; I chose this one because I liked the graphs.
Electric cars have a FAR lower lifetime CO2 footprint and a FAR lower lifetime energy footprint. Since energy correlates closely to dollars, it means electric cars have a far lower total cost of ownership.
These graphs are for Vancouver CA in 2018, so energy costs are similar to the US; however energy is represented in megajoules - there are 3.6 MJ in a KWH, and 1 MJ = .37 horsepower hours. It assumes 150,000Km of travel over the life of the car, about 93,000 miles.
Lifecycle CO2 costs (these include extracting & transporting oil)
Lifecycle energy costs
Source: https://sustain.ubc.ca/sites/default/files/2018-63%20Lifecycle%20Analysis%20of%20Electric%20Vehicles_Kukreja.pdf
And yes, the US has the electric capacity. Now.
BTW, lithium batteries are great because they recycle so well.
And, lithium salts dissolved in hot geothermal wells has minimal environmental impact.
However, Bennett and Isaac raise an important question: have proponents truly accounted for the myriad of subsidies, regulatory credits, and infrastructure support that bolster the EV market?
Funny thing, that biased study fails to ask the same question about the decades of subsidies the oil industry and automobile industry have received and continue to receive.
Another funny thing, that study fails to measure the costs of pumping all that CO2 into our atmosphere.
Here's a nice apples-to-apples comparison. There are many like it online; I chose this one because I liked the graphs.
Electric cars have a FAR lower lifetime CO2 footprint and a FAR lower lifetime energy footprint. Since energy correlates closely to dollars, it means electric cars have a far lower total cost of ownership.
These graphs are for Vancouver CA in 2018, so energy costs are similar to the US; however energy is represented in megajoules - there are 3.6 MJ in a KWH, and 1 MJ = .37 horsepower hours. It assumes 150,000Km of travel over the life of the car, about 93,000 miles.
Lifecycle CO2 costs (these include extracting & transporting oil)
Lifecycle energy costs
Source: https://sustain.ubc.ca/sites/default/files/2018-63%20Lifecycle%20Analysis%20of%20Electric%20Vehicles_Kukreja.pdf
And yes, the US has the electric capacity. Now.
If all US cars were EVs, they would need a total of 1,106.6TWh, which is 27.6% of what the American grid produced in 2020.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesmorris/2021/11/13/electricity-grids-can-handle-electric-vehicles-easily--they-just-need-proper-management/Is There Enough Electricity for EVs? Yes. Here’s Who Will Charge Them.
https://www.barrons.com/articles/theres-enough-electricity-in-the-world-for-electric-vehicles-heres-who-will-charge-them-51605368406 The world has 8,000 gigawatts of installed electricity generation capacity, according to the International Energy Agency. In theory, if the capacity ran 24-7 it could generate 69 million gigawatt hours of electricity annually.
The world consumed about 27 million gigawatt hours of electricity in 2019. That electricity warmed homes and ran businesses. What’s more, the world consumed the equivalent of roughly 28 million gigawatt hours of electrical energy to power its cars and trucks. That energy, of course, was stored in liquid fuel. Power plants didn’t have to generate it. Gasoline and diesel make most of the world’s vehicles go.
So 27 plus 28 is 56. The world needs 56 million gigawatt hours to keep the lights on as well as drive cars and trucks. There is 69 million gigawatt hours of capacity.No problem. But the generating capacity of wind and solar, of course, can’t be “on” 100% of the time. And even coal, nuclear, and hydro power plants have to take maintenance downtime. Still, there looks to be some spare generating capacity and the world’s 2 billion or so vehicles won’t convert to battery power all at once.
The world consumed about 27 million gigawatt hours of electricity in 2019. That electricity warmed homes and ran businesses. What’s more, the world consumed the equivalent of roughly 28 million gigawatt hours of electrical energy to power its cars and trucks. That energy, of course, was stored in liquid fuel. Power plants didn’t have to generate it. Gasoline and diesel make most of the world’s vehicles go.
So 27 plus 28 is 56. The world needs 56 million gigawatt hours to keep the lights on as well as drive cars and trucks. There is 69 million gigawatt hours of capacity.No problem. But the generating capacity of wind and solar, of course, can’t be “on” 100% of the time. And even coal, nuclear, and hydro power plants have to take maintenance downtime. Still, there looks to be some spare generating capacity and the world’s 2 billion or so vehicles won’t convert to battery power all at once.
BTW, lithium batteries are great because they recycle so well.
Study: Recycled Lithium Batteries as Good as Newly Mined > Cathodes made with novel direct-recycling beat commercial materials
15 Oct 2021
https://spectrum.ieee.org/recycled-batteries-good-as-newly-mined15 Oct 2021
And, lithium salts dissolved in hot geothermal wells has minimal environmental impact.
The new 'gold rush' for green lithium
Geothermal brine could become a promising and sustainable source of an essential element for the renewable energy transition
24th November 2020
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20201124-how-geothermal-lithium-could-revolutionise-green-energyGeothermal brine could become a promising and sustainable source of an essential element for the renewable energy transition
24th November 2020
calicuz · 56-60, M
Well, I'd say there's more to all this than what's on the surface. In Japan, where electric cars outsold gasoline cars last year, the price of electricity is lower than in the US. The average cost for a monthly electric bill for a couple with no kids is 42 American dollars in Japan. So it's not the cost of the vehicle we need to be outraged about, it sounds to me like the US Energy Producers need to lower utility costs in America. And that last statement is true with or without electric vehicles in the conversation. IMHO of course.
PhoenixPhail · M
@calicuz Very good point.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
The other day I drove 600 miles round trip. It was about 0 F and a bit of a wind. I never had to stop except for meals and bathroom breaks. Inside the cab the 4 riders were nice and warm and were able to travel in their shirt sleeves. Not possible in an electric. BTW the trip took me 10 hours. Not possible in an electric.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@ArishMell Around here -18 C (0 F) is considered warm. A winter or two ago I drove 4.5 hours through -40 weather. No coat required and the winders were all frost free. I didn't see any electrics on the road that day but the winterized ICE vehicles were having no problem. Yes there were some breakdowns but that was most likely to the lack of winterization. Antifreeze was too weak or oil too heavy or simply not kept in winter running condition. BTW the trip was cross country and not city driving. A stall or other failure could have been life threatening to anyone unprepared. The eletics simply could not take that kind of punishment. Their batteries would be dead in a few minutes and be impossible to recharge.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@hippyjoe1955 Yes - I know the Winter conditions in Canada and other Arctic regions must never be taken lightly. Though not as harsh, those in Scotland can be just as dangerous, and with long distances between towns.
Serious blizzards in the South of England are quite rare but we had an exceptionally bad Winter at the start of 1963. I recall two people were caught in their car in the snow on an exposed hill, kept the engine running for heat, and died from the exhaust fumes. The snow drift must have deflected the gases into the car. They were only four miles from the town, as well.
The drive for everything to be all-electric is well-meant, but I don't think it's properly thought through; and brings many problems of its own.
Serious blizzards in the South of England are quite rare but we had an exceptionally bad Winter at the start of 1963. I recall two people were caught in their car in the snow on an exposed hill, kept the engine running for heat, and died from the exhaust fumes. The snow drift must have deflected the gases into the car. They were only four miles from the town, as well.
The drive for everything to be all-electric is well-meant, but I don't think it's properly thought through; and brings many problems of its own.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@ArishMell When I was a kid our neighbor had an interesting experience. One day a chinook was blowing and it was beautiful out for mid January. The snow was melting and the water was running off the eaves. Suddenly the wind shifted and a howling blizzard began. Later that night the wind died down and the temperature dropped drastically. The neighbor's dog started to bark and the neighbor went to find out why. The dog would run off to the south east and run back. The neighbor started to follow the dog but found the snow too deep so he got his tractor started and started to follow the dog. About a 1/4 mile later he saw a young woman lying in the snow. He picked her up and got her into the cab of the tractor and the lady mumbled something about her mother. The neighbor took that as a hint and followed the woman's footprints in the snow until he found the mother almost buried in the snow. She was too stiff to get into the cab so he put her on the front end loader and raced back to the house. His wife stripped the women of their wet and frozen clothes and put them in the bathtub full of hot water. Both women survived with some loss of extremities to frost bite. They had set out on a warm day without proper winter survival gear and then hit the ditch when the blizzard hit and they couldn't see the road. They waited out the blizzard in the warm car but when no one came down the road they decided to walk to the neighbor's house because they could see his yard light. They won't make that mistake again.
Longleggedlady · 31-35, F
My big thing about these dodgy electric cars is what are we going to do with all the depleted lithium batteries? It is very nasty stuff.
Secondly it is at the moment and for many years to come just shifting the dirt from point A to point B as the majority of the power to make the electric is fossil fuel generated ?
Thirdly this range issue is very problematic due to the loss in colder or hotter climate zones and my husband who is an electrical engineer and understands this stuff far better than I says they are also not telling the whole story about how as the batteries age the charge they will retain will lessen with each charge from day one of charging, equally fast charging is not good for batteries either to do that you are basically putting a power surge across it, nor is charging a battery where you have say used only 20% of it that day it is going to cause loss of capacity if constantly done.
The other issue I can see is if you have to do lots of mileage in a day as part of working how are you going to get it done with a vehicle that doesn't have the range to do it.
Secondly it is at the moment and for many years to come just shifting the dirt from point A to point B as the majority of the power to make the electric is fossil fuel generated ?
Thirdly this range issue is very problematic due to the loss in colder or hotter climate zones and my husband who is an electrical engineer and understands this stuff far better than I says they are also not telling the whole story about how as the batteries age the charge they will retain will lessen with each charge from day one of charging, equally fast charging is not good for batteries either to do that you are basically putting a power surge across it, nor is charging a battery where you have say used only 20% of it that day it is going to cause loss of capacity if constantly done.
The other issue I can see is if you have to do lots of mileage in a day as part of working how are you going to get it done with a vehicle that doesn't have the range to do it.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@Longleggedlady That suggests poor management, not an engineering problem, by the authorities and the waste-disposal companies. To be fair though, it's possible the batteries are being stored pending the scrap trade installing the necessary equipment, or simply to create economical loads for transporting.
Of course they are out of public sight. These stores are industrial facilities, and industrial facilities are closed to all but authorised personnel, for safety and security; and as necessary enclosed in weather-proof buildings. So don't let that "out of site" worry you. It's right and normal.
Possibly much more serious is the sheer waste of materials by people discarding unwanted but often still serviceable or repairable, electrical and non-electrical equipment in landfill - there is no excuse for that.
While throwing Li-ion and some other types of batteries in the dustbin can, and does, lead to fires in refuse-lorries and waste-disposal facilities.
Do your local supermarkets and other shops have battery-collection pots? They do around where I live: just simple plastic jars. When full the batch is presumably collected by the battery suppliers, or taken to a suitable "recycling" point.
Though voluntary collection by the shops, the disposal of old batteries, and other electrical items generally, is of course covered by the EU's "Waste Electrical & Electronic Equipment" Directive; and although the UK has left the EU we still apply the UK-law transposition of this set of regulations.
Of course they are out of public sight. These stores are industrial facilities, and industrial facilities are closed to all but authorised personnel, for safety and security; and as necessary enclosed in weather-proof buildings. So don't let that "out of site" worry you. It's right and normal.
Possibly much more serious is the sheer waste of materials by people discarding unwanted but often still serviceable or repairable, electrical and non-electrical equipment in landfill - there is no excuse for that.
While throwing Li-ion and some other types of batteries in the dustbin can, and does, lead to fires in refuse-lorries and waste-disposal facilities.
Do your local supermarkets and other shops have battery-collection pots? They do around where I live: just simple plastic jars. When full the batch is presumably collected by the battery suppliers, or taken to a suitable "recycling" point.
Though voluntary collection by the shops, the disposal of old batteries, and other electrical items generally, is of course covered by the EU's "Waste Electrical & Electronic Equipment" Directive; and although the UK has left the EU we still apply the UK-law transposition of this set of regulations.
Longleggedlady · 31-35, F
@ArishMell
Pollution Due to Lithium-ion Battery Recycling
Material recovery is usually what impacts the environment negatively. For instance, pyrometallurgy is one of the processes that demand a lot of energy resulting in the emission of GHG and other toxic fumes that contaminate the air.
read this
https://www.cenex-lcv.co.uk/news-media/exhibitor/what-is-the-environmental-impact-of-lithium-batteries#:~:text=Pollution%20Due%20to%20Lithium%2Dion,fumes%20that%20contaminate%20the%20air.
Pollution Due to Lithium-ion Battery Recycling
Material recovery is usually what impacts the environment negatively. For instance, pyrometallurgy is one of the processes that demand a lot of energy resulting in the emission of GHG and other toxic fumes that contaminate the air.
read this
https://www.cenex-lcv.co.uk/news-media/exhibitor/what-is-the-environmental-impact-of-lithium-batteries#:~:text=Pollution%20Due%20to%20Lithium%2Dion,fumes%20that%20contaminate%20the%20air.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@Longleggedlady Interesting - thankyou.
The message though is contained in the conclusion: it's not using these batteries that is the problem but how the materials are mined, and how the old batteries are scrapped. Well, they know the problems so it is up to the manufacturers to solve the problems and do it properly, if necessary by legal compulsion - although no-one can tell a country like China to behave.
It is also up to the users, including we public, to dispose of old batteries and other electrical equipment via the proper routes, not by just chucking it in the nearest dustbin. Or on the ground.
The lithium extraction "mining" being started in Cornwall is showing considerable promise, not least because it has no intrinsic environmental problems. Just the opposite if anything, by removing the metal salts from the ground-water flooding the abandoned mines.
The message though is contained in the conclusion: it's not using these batteries that is the problem but how the materials are mined, and how the old batteries are scrapped. Well, they know the problems so it is up to the manufacturers to solve the problems and do it properly, if necessary by legal compulsion - although no-one can tell a country like China to behave.
It is also up to the users, including we public, to dispose of old batteries and other electrical equipment via the proper routes, not by just chucking it in the nearest dustbin. Or on the ground.
The lithium extraction "mining" being started in Cornwall is showing considerable promise, not least because it has no intrinsic environmental problems. Just the opposite if anything, by removing the metal salts from the ground-water flooding the abandoned mines.
Northwest · M
Federalist papers? Hmmm. I will read this report, when I get an hour to waste.
I have an EV, and the cost of my car’s purchase price was similar to its fossil fuel sibling, thanks to tax incentives and manufacturer incentives.
The cost to charge it is a fraction of the cost fill it’s sibling with gasoline. Electricity in my area is around $0.15 per kW, when I’m plugged at home. Even when I’m on the road. It runs about $20 per fill up, as opposed to more than $55 for gas.
Power in my area is nearly 100% hydro-wind.
There are challenges, like how long it takes to charge while on the road, and on a day such this one, when it’s 25F, and tte car needs a couple of minutes to get ready, but infrastructure is getting better and for driving within 100 miles from home, charging is similar to filling up with gas.
We need more charging stations, that’s for sure, but we’re not going to there without a total commitment, and the latter is long overdue.
I have an EV, and the cost of my car’s purchase price was similar to its fossil fuel sibling, thanks to tax incentives and manufacturer incentives.
The cost to charge it is a fraction of the cost fill it’s sibling with gasoline. Electricity in my area is around $0.15 per kW, when I’m plugged at home. Even when I’m on the road. It runs about $20 per fill up, as opposed to more than $55 for gas.
Power in my area is nearly 100% hydro-wind.
There are challenges, like how long it takes to charge while on the road, and on a day such this one, when it’s 25F, and tte car needs a couple of minutes to get ready, but infrastructure is getting better and for driving within 100 miles from home, charging is similar to filling up with gas.
We need more charging stations, that’s for sure, but we’re not going to there without a total commitment, and the latter is long overdue.
Elessar · 26-30, M
thefederalistpapers.org/opinion
lol
lol
deadgerbil · 26-30
@Elessar 😬
Patriot96 · 56-60, C
Costing the environment more
Elessar · 26-30, M
@Carla Here they say there is an inverse correlation between car size (whether it's the frame or engine is not specified) and sexual performances 🙈
And indeed, those who have the biggest cars tend to be the biggest a$$holes on the road, which could be explained with.. frustration? 😬
And indeed, those who have the biggest cars tend to be the biggest a$$holes on the road, which could be explained with.. frustration? 😬
TexChik · F
[image/video deleted]
ArishMell · 70-79, M
Note the word immediately before
I can't judge the figures or the reporting but it will vary considerably from country to country, not least by the national equivalence of the capital costs of the new car against cost of living, the cost of the electricity compared to liquid fuels (those are heavily taxed in some countries); and the servicing costs.
Insurance of course, is very highly variable because it depends on the driver and home area as well as vehicle, and the cover purchased.
In the UK such vehicles are sort of subsidised by no Road Fund Tax being levied on them, but this is set to change.
Also, unlike the cost of petrol and Diesel fuels, which have to be displayed openly and prominently on the forecourt and pumps, we are not told the cost of the electricity until buying it - or have bought it. To the best of my knowledge this is the only commodity allowed to be sold in the UK without price display!
/report-shows-...
I can't judge the figures or the reporting but it will vary considerably from country to country, not least by the national equivalence of the capital costs of the new car against cost of living, the cost of the electricity compared to liquid fuels (those are heavily taxed in some countries); and the servicing costs.
Insurance of course, is very highly variable because it depends on the driver and home area as well as vehicle, and the cover purchased.
In the UK such vehicles are sort of subsidised by no Road Fund Tax being levied on them, but this is set to change.
Also, unlike the cost of petrol and Diesel fuels, which have to be displayed openly and prominently on the forecourt and pumps, we are not told the cost of the electricity until buying it - or have bought it. To the best of my knowledge this is the only commodity allowed to be sold in the UK without price display!
CountScrofula · 41-45, M
S'why we need commuter trains not endlessly fancier private vehicles.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@CountScrofula @calicuz
Many people in England live without any public-transport services, and not necessarily in remote rural areas, either. It becomes a bit of vicious circle though: the private car is more convenient in such places, so use of any train or bus service that did exist drops to the services dwindle, so more people drive instead.....
I've friends who live in a village some 6 miles from the nearest town, in fact a row of towns up to about 10 miles away. One bus a week: it comes through the village in the morning, makes an afternoon return trip. Next one, next week.
..... Politics and astronomical costs?
Seen News reports about Britain's much-vaunted "High-Speed Two" railway line?
This is / was a brand-new railway to run from London to Birmingham (<200 miles away) then on to major Northern English cities. It was not quite as heavily politicised as a USA scheme might be, but still at the mercy of governments baffled by the spiralling costs, That was due in part to governments insisting on changes that then meant back to the planning-offices, the estimators and quantity-surveyors, the land-purchasing people, and the drawing-boards (well, all right CAD on computers).
So now they've axed the more critical Northern half, making it extremely unlikely it can ever be built!
To be fair the idea is to spend the money instead on improving the existing lines in the North of England, which has a cluster of major cities; but we shall see. The biggest problem governments of all parties seem to have is not lack of financial acumen, or even of will; but lack of even basic science and engineering nous!
.
"High-Speed Two"?
Was there a "One"? Oh yes - and it was very successful! It did not need new lines, for one thing.
Introduced by the State-owned British Rail, its specially-built Diesel trains called HS125s, were rated for cruising at up to 125mph maximum on existing main railways improved to appropriately higher standards.
Most trunk-route trains now in the UK are Diesel or electric descendants of the HS125s; and some sections of line are cleared for up to 140mph. Not fast by French TGV let alone Japanese "Bullet Train" speeds, but those run much longer distances than in Britain. It means the fastest trains from London to Edinburgh, with only two or three intermediate stops, take only about 4 hours for the 400 miles. In steam days the fastest took about 8 hours, and that non-stop: the locomotives had special tenders with corridor connections, for mid-run crew changes without stopping.
(Yes you can fly: about 1 hour in the air; but when you add the long, compulsory airport booking-in time and the cities-to-airports journeys, it might cost less but is not very competitive in time and convenience.)
Many people in England live without any public-transport services, and not necessarily in remote rural areas, either. It becomes a bit of vicious circle though: the private car is more convenient in such places, so use of any train or bus service that did exist drops to the services dwindle, so more people drive instead.....
I've friends who live in a village some 6 miles from the nearest town, in fact a row of towns up to about 10 miles away. One bus a week: it comes through the village in the morning, makes an afternoon return trip. Next one, next week.
..... Politics and astronomical costs?
Seen News reports about Britain's much-vaunted "High-Speed Two" railway line?
This is / was a brand-new railway to run from London to Birmingham (<200 miles away) then on to major Northern English cities. It was not quite as heavily politicised as a USA scheme might be, but still at the mercy of governments baffled by the spiralling costs, That was due in part to governments insisting on changes that then meant back to the planning-offices, the estimators and quantity-surveyors, the land-purchasing people, and the drawing-boards (well, all right CAD on computers).
So now they've axed the more critical Northern half, making it extremely unlikely it can ever be built!
To be fair the idea is to spend the money instead on improving the existing lines in the North of England, which has a cluster of major cities; but we shall see. The biggest problem governments of all parties seem to have is not lack of financial acumen, or even of will; but lack of even basic science and engineering nous!
.
"High-Speed Two"?
Was there a "One"? Oh yes - and it was very successful! It did not need new lines, for one thing.
Introduced by the State-owned British Rail, its specially-built Diesel trains called HS125s, were rated for cruising at up to 125mph maximum on existing main railways improved to appropriately higher standards.
Most trunk-route trains now in the UK are Diesel or electric descendants of the HS125s; and some sections of line are cleared for up to 140mph. Not fast by French TGV let alone Japanese "Bullet Train" speeds, but those run much longer distances than in Britain. It means the fastest trains from London to Edinburgh, with only two or three intermediate stops, take only about 4 hours for the 400 miles. In steam days the fastest took about 8 hours, and that non-stop: the locomotives had special tenders with corridor connections, for mid-run crew changes without stopping.
(Yes you can fly: about 1 hour in the air; but when you add the long, compulsory airport booking-in time and the cities-to-airports journeys, it might cost less but is not very competitive in time and convenience.)
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@Patriot96 That point recently emerged in a BBC Radio Four programme examining our similar HS2 project: of a huge number of ambitious civil-engineering projects in progress around the world, hardly any are on time and budget!
So we with our HS2 in England, and you with yours in California, are not alone!
So we with our HS2 in England, and you with yours in California, are not alone!
nudistsueaz · 61-69, F
@Patriot96 Cali is a third world country
ElwoodBlues · M
@Patriot96 @PhoenixPhail claim
Why are you guys pretending we don't subsidize the oil industry???
Naturally, you guys are gonna claim the source is biased and therefore ignore it. While you're at it, how about proving your thefederalistpapers.org/opinion piece is unbiased, LOL!!!
if evs were actually viable we wouldnt need our tax money to subsidize it
Why are you guys pretending we don't subsidize the oil industry???
05.03.23
SEN. WHITEHOUSE ON FOSSIL FUEL SUBSIDIES: “WE ARE SUBSIDIZING THE DANGER”
Washington, D.C.—U.S. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Chairman of the U.S. Senate Budget Committee, delivered the following opening statement at today’s hearing entitled, “Who Pays the Price: The Real Cost of Fossil Fuels.”
. . .
But the really big subsidy is the license to pollute for free. The IMF calls this global free pass an “implicit” fossil fuel subsidy. Economists call it an “unpriced externality.” Behind these benign-sounding phrases is a lot of harm.
. . .
You tally up the harms, and the IMF estimates it at a $5.4 trillion annual subsidy worldwide. In the United States, it’s $646 billion – every single year.
. . .
It is not about debts or deficits. It’s dirty work for an industry that controls one of the main political parties in this country. Oil and gas extraction represents only about 5 percent of GDP. Farming, manufacturing, food and beverage, insurance, finance, restaurants, retail, housing, healthcare – all represent a larger share of GDP. Clean energy now accounts for more employment than the fossil fuel industry. But for political influence, to protect those massive subsidies, nothing compares to fossil fuel.
https://www.budget.senate.gov/chairman/newsroom/press/sen-whitehouse-on-fossil-fuel-subsidies-we-are-subsidizing-the-danger-SEN. WHITEHOUSE ON FOSSIL FUEL SUBSIDIES: “WE ARE SUBSIDIZING THE DANGER”
Washington, D.C.—U.S. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Chairman of the U.S. Senate Budget Committee, delivered the following opening statement at today’s hearing entitled, “Who Pays the Price: The Real Cost of Fossil Fuels.”
. . .
But the really big subsidy is the license to pollute for free. The IMF calls this global free pass an “implicit” fossil fuel subsidy. Economists call it an “unpriced externality.” Behind these benign-sounding phrases is a lot of harm.
. . .
You tally up the harms, and the IMF estimates it at a $5.4 trillion annual subsidy worldwide. In the United States, it’s $646 billion – every single year.
. . .
It is not about debts or deficits. It’s dirty work for an industry that controls one of the main political parties in this country. Oil and gas extraction represents only about 5 percent of GDP. Farming, manufacturing, food and beverage, insurance, finance, restaurants, retail, housing, healthcare – all represent a larger share of GDP. Clean energy now accounts for more employment than the fossil fuel industry. But for political influence, to protect those massive subsidies, nothing compares to fossil fuel.
Naturally, you guys are gonna claim the source is biased and therefore ignore it. While you're at it, how about proving your thefederalistpapers.org/opinion piece is unbiased, LOL!!!
TrashCat · M
OK... stop with that federalistpapers malarkey. Peo0le squawk about CNN and Fox being fake news, but I am convinced the Federalistpapers are a bad parody. Stick with the Onion. It's funny in a good way
Carissimi · F
I heard that Ford is not producing EVs anymore, but not sure if that’s a fact.
PhoenixPhail · M
@Carissimi https://www.theverge.com/2023/10/26/23934172/ford-12-billion-ev-investment-postpone-q3-earnings
SW-User
@Carissimi it’s not a fact. They’re scaling back investment because most Americans believe they are still too expensive.
MarineBob · 56-60, M
With all the cash uncle Sam put into it they should be dirt cheap
HannahSky · F
Most people I know that have ev, have hybrids, so not sure what the grand total really is yet.
I don't think I'll ever go ev unless they speed them up a bit.
I don't think I'll ever go ev unless they speed them up a bit.
Patriot96 · 56-60, C
Believe you lyin eyes, schmuck
SW-User
@Carissimi prove it.
Carissimi · F
Do your own research. You want me to prove common sense. Shikes! Go take a nap. I don’t have the patience with Woke nonsense. Go get a brain transplant. @SW-User
SW-User
@Carissimi 🤣 I've come to the conclusion that being woke means you're not a Trump supporter :)
He lost, by the way. Learn to accept it and move on.
(P.S. Ah, so you can't prove it :) Sorry, granny, the world is changing for the better :) )
He lost, by the way. Learn to accept it and move on.
(P.S. Ah, so you can't prove it :) Sorry, granny, the world is changing for the better :) )
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
The solar tuk tuk is practical, unless people refuse to allow it.
https://youtu.be/s0KwqSaFwf4?si=vFjPu4j1yN8Fjckf
https://youtu.be/s0KwqSaFwf4?si=vFjPu4j1yN8Fjckf
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@Roundandroundwego Neat idea! I assume the panel charges a battery rather than trying to power the traction-motor.
In fact I have seen something similar on a very small Citroen car, too; but I forget the name of the model.
In fact I have seen something similar on a very small Citroen car, too; but I forget the name of the model.
MarineBob · 56-60, M
Lordstown and Workhorse was founded by the same person
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This message was deleted by its author.
This message was deleted by its author.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@SandWitch Thank you for all that work!
I suppose most motorists are aware the range advertised is never real, that public fast-chargers only give 80% charges, and the battery will lose capacity, but it's clearly far more subtle and far-reaching than that.
I don't know how the second-hand trade for these things is the UK. It probably varies from country to country, but I have heard on dealer, on the radio, say they are hard to sell on.
Owning a battery-car will never be likely for me, but what you've explained makes it even less feasible.
I suppose most motorists are aware the range advertised is never real, that public fast-chargers only give 80% charges, and the battery will lose capacity, but it's clearly far more subtle and far-reaching than that.
I don't know how the second-hand trade for these things is the UK. It probably varies from country to country, but I have heard on dealer, on the radio, say they are hard to sell on.
Owning a battery-car will never be likely for me, but what you've explained makes it even less feasible.
This message was deleted by its author.