This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly AdultAsking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Why is Germany concerned that there is no joint plan for bringing the conflict with Iran to an end?

How will the criticism of European allies, like Spain and the U.K., by President Trump affect U.S. relations with these countries or other European countries?
Can you share some specific experiences where your view on money and relationships was tested, and how you handled them?
Does Europe need to be a superpower to rival the U.S., Russia, and China?
Have you ever encountered a helpless arrogant sexually inferior egoist?
If Iran makes good on its promise to 'set ablaze' any vessel using the trade route through the Strait of Hormuz, what would be the consequences for both Iran and Saudi Arabia?
Do you think it's a matter of time before Iran wants to negotiate a deal with the US, as Donald Trump claimed?
How many of Trump's golf courses have shabby services (rodents and roaches in the restaurants, bad food, that sort of thing)?
Should Rep. Blake Moore be worried about his primary challenge from Karianne Lisonbee?
Are you surprised the State Department and DHS have not yet provided a comment on the lawsuit filed by noncitizen academics challenging the Trump administration's immigration policy?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
This is s good time to maybe re-apprise NATO from both the European nations view as well as the US's.

Without NATO in the 40s, 50s and 60s, the Soviet Union's footprint would likely have extended to the English Channel and North Africa. The US and the hundreds of military installations and hundreds of thousands of forces scattered from the Black Sea to across the full length of the Med, through North Africa to beyond Spain and to the North Sea and the North Pole kept the Soviet Union contained on their side of the Iron Curtain. Now since the Soviet Union crumbled, the US presence across Europe and North Africa is probably view by our European friends as more of an infringing nuisance than a benefit. Also as the European economies recovered from the war and were less and less in need of the the cash that the US injected into Europe to support the US forces in Europe, our European friends view all those old US military installations as better suited for housing projects or public airports, and the economic benefits of the US cash used to fund NATO have long since been replaced by lopsided tariffs that favor European economies.

The reasons why NATO existed have progressively gone away. And from its very beginning it was less about the US security than Europe's, so why is the US still paying for it?