Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Population control WILL happen; it is inevitable, because either we will do it or mother nature will do it.

Covid? That's Mother Nature's population control and this is just a small taste of how bad it could get.

I promise you controlling our own population would be a much more pleasant option for everyone.

We have observed this time and time again in lab settings with many other species; when population density in a given ecosystem gets too high, plagues happen, famine happens, infant mortality happens, hyperaggression happens.

Like it or not it's gonna happen, it's just a question of do you want it rough or gentle.
BlueVeins · 22-25 Best Comment
The world is already critically overpopulated and it's a gigantic burden on the natural world... but of course, you can't point that out or you're a eugenicist who wants to do forced abortions on poor people 🙄
Doomflower · 36-40, M
@BlueVeins hear hear

reflectingmonkey · 51-55, M
it worked for China, they had a strict control on how many children are allowed per family and they have managed to slow down dramatically the rise of their population. its possible that at some point in the future a man-maid virus will be necessary but no, unlike what silly conspirationist, covid was not a man-made virus meant to reduce global population, or, if it was, it was a major faillure since it kills only a small percentage of its hosts. A virus that makes people infertile might be more useful but they need to make sure a percentage of people are vaccinated so that some stay fertile. before all that, controling the rate of births would be easier.
BlueVeins · 22-25
@Eternity ehhhhhhhh we could probably get a much better result from dedicating the same amt of money to family planning & sex ed in the developing world, and to far more humane and morally unambiguous results. would freak the cuckservatives out a lot less, which shouldn't be a factor but unfortunately is.

Wealthier countries have waaaaay fewer babies than poor ones, so beyond that, let's lay into development projects in general.
Eternity · 26-30, M
@BlueVeins people are dumb man,and the public education system is what made them that way.

Buying fertility off people with weak genes is such a simpler solution and, though more expensive in the short term, will ultimately save far more in the future on healthcare and aide for people with debilitating illnesses of body and/or mind.
BlueVeins · 22-25
@Eternity Not necessarily. First of all, most of the people who sell their fertility away are probably gonna be people who didn't want to have kids anyway. I mean, raising a kid costs half a million dollars minimum last I checked here in the developed world. Ultimately, the desire to reproduce isn't [i]super[/i] price-sensitive. So realistically, you'd be paying several score thousand -- if not over a hundred thousand -- per baby prevented.

And the ethics of doing this are kinda questionable. I mean in principle, it [i]shouldn't[/i] be wrong because all we're technically doing is giving people another opportunity on how to make money and nobody's legally obligated to take it. But it gets to the same problem as warfare where, when the government extends social mobility in exchange for some extreme sacrifice, it starts to become a replacement for welfare and defer the more serious action that we need.

Don't think that's a big problem? Fine, but it doesn't even come close to comparing to the downright angellic nature of foreign aid to developing countries and lifting people out of poverty. It's true that it's more complicated, but there's also way, way more statistical evidence behind that strategy and the poll of people we could reach is much, much larger.
We have seen it happen in real life as well. Easter Island comes to mind first when some idiot chopped down the last tree.
NeuroticByNature · 41-45, F
Hey Im doing my part in not reproducing.
NeuroticByNature · 41-45, F
I mean I did once but thats all.
Human population rates are already decreasing , and have been since about 1990.

Fertility is going down , tje mimbwr if children being born is going down.

Not saying our numbers are not still increasing...but tje decline has started.

The thing with lowering population is ...maintaining quality of life and production .

And if that doesn't happen....taxes increase .

Its not easy for societies built on expansion, to cope with reduction .
Eternity · 26-30, M
@OogieBoogie fair point. I'm sure it would help with sustainability though; infinite expansion is not possible. We will have to slow down and find a holding pattern sooner or later.

Sooner saves lives, later ends millions abruptly .
@Eternity oh I agree we need to learn to decrease, become more efficient, produce less crap and more quality.

Work smarter, not harder.
Laffytaffy · 22-25, F
Angry at Nature for killing my grandma with cancer
😡
DDonde · 31-35, M
Probably better to let nature do it than get tangled in what will essentially be eugenics.
Eternity · 26-30, M
@DDonde eugenics is not intrinsically evil; rockets blow things up but they also took us to the moon.

Evil and ignorant people used it for evil; decent and sensible people could use it for good
Mrsbetweenfatandfit · 26-30, F
Dwight thought it first

[image deleted]
SW-User
But what about the bread

 
Post Comment