This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Just one person.
A fetus isn't a person. As far as i can tell it possesses no qualities of personhood beyond having human DNA.
Many laws count it as 2 to reflect the violation of the mother's rights, not the fetus. The charge is placed on the involuntary destruction of the fetus which the woman intended and desired to bring to term. In short, you're murdering a child they wanted to have but the fetus itself is not considered a person.
A fetus isn't a person. As far as i can tell it possesses no qualities of personhood beyond having human DNA.
Many laws count it as 2 to reflect the violation of the mother's rights, not the fetus. The charge is placed on the involuntary destruction of the fetus which the woman intended and desired to bring to term. In short, you're murdering a child they wanted to have but the fetus itself is not considered a person.
@revenant
Interesting. Not particularly useful to anyone else as a metric for humanity though.
Let's explore that conscience with this question:
You're a firefighter and you're responding to a fire at a fertility clinic or some such.
You enter the building and you see on your left, a 3 year old girl and on your right a tank full of hundreds of fertilized embryos ready and intended for implantation.
Do you save the little girl or do you save the embryos?
Interesting. Not particularly useful to anyone else as a metric for humanity though.
Let's explore that conscience with this question:
You're a firefighter and you're responding to a fire at a fertility clinic or some such.
You enter the building and you see on your left, a 3 year old girl and on your right a tank full of hundreds of fertilized embryos ready and intended for implantation.
Do you save the little girl or do you save the embryos?
@revenant
No they're fine. Protected by the tank and can be implanted into waiting and willing wombs promptly.
What we're doing here is making a scenario where everything is equal. You can save the embryos exactly as easily as you can save the girl and they have equal chances for survival.
In short, your only consideration in this hypothetical scenario is whether you consider the embryos to be persons with the "essence" of humanity. If you do then certainly you must save a hundred human lives over just one.
Would you like to change your answer or stick with the little girl?
No they're fine. Protected by the tank and can be implanted into waiting and willing wombs promptly.
What we're doing here is making a scenario where everything is equal. You can save the embryos exactly as easily as you can save the girl and they have equal chances for survival.
In short, your only consideration in this hypothetical scenario is whether you consider the embryos to be persons with the "essence" of humanity. If you do then certainly you must save a hundred human lives over just one.
Would you like to change your answer or stick with the little girl?
@revenant
OK so a heartbeat is the thing that makes it a person.
Well does your answer change if we turn those embryos into fetuses?
Let's say the tank is now full of a hundred fetuses at around the stage of development where abortion is still legal.
Now would you save the fetuses over the little girl?
OK so a heartbeat is the thing that makes it a person.
Well does your answer change if we turn those embryos into fetuses?
Let's say the tank is now full of a hundred fetuses at around the stage of development where abortion is still legal.
Now would you save the fetuses over the little girl?
@revenant
So destiny is the value of a person and it only begins when you're born? Interesting.
So what we've established so far is that a fetus without a parent is not the same as person and since they lack a destiny, they're also not the same as a person.
...so should we consider them persons?
So destiny is the value of a person and it only begins when you're born? Interesting.
So what we've established so far is that a fetus without a parent is not the same as person and since they lack a destiny, they're also not the same as a person.
...so should we consider them persons?
Straylight · 31-35, F
@revenant Your conscience on the matter is just an emotion and has no more bearing on whether or not you're right than being happy or sad about something.
revenant · F
@Straylight well yeah but it is my life's choice