This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
If one side is presenting actual proof, and the other cannot, I would obviously believe the side presenting proof.
With SW specifically though, presenting proof is not allowed, thus you cannot defend yourself against a serial liar on SW, and the liar can continue to lie ad nauseum in public as long as they do not literally show your username, even though everyone knows who they are talking about, and they can continue lying about you in private, both before and after you addressed their lies in public, without any penalty (and their spreading rumors in private is part of what led you to outing them in public in the first place, after one of the most trusted people on this site revealed the liar's behind-the-scenes machinations to you).
A certain portion of this site can be clearly shown that 2+2=4, but if the liar tells them 2+2=7, that's what this portion of the site will continue to believe, overriding their own eyes, even after being shown proof of the liar also lying to them and/or badmouthing them behind their back ... for those people, the person revealing the deception to them will always be the bad guy, not the person doing the deception ... it is just surreal, up really is down here. I've never experienced anything like this before, never had any reason to address anything like that in public before either.
Presumably you're not even allowed to reveal the mothballed alt of the liar either.
It is very disappointing that this is what the admins consider just.
With SW specifically though, presenting proof is not allowed, thus you cannot defend yourself against a serial liar on SW, and the liar can continue to lie ad nauseum in public as long as they do not literally show your username, even though everyone knows who they are talking about, and they can continue lying about you in private, both before and after you addressed their lies in public, without any penalty (and their spreading rumors in private is part of what led you to outing them in public in the first place, after one of the most trusted people on this site revealed the liar's behind-the-scenes machinations to you).
A certain portion of this site can be clearly shown that 2+2=4, but if the liar tells them 2+2=7, that's what this portion of the site will continue to believe, overriding their own eyes, even after being shown proof of the liar also lying to them and/or badmouthing them behind their back ... for those people, the person revealing the deception to them will always be the bad guy, not the person doing the deception ... it is just surreal, up really is down here. I've never experienced anything like this before, never had any reason to address anything like that in public before either.
Presumably you're not even allowed to reveal the mothballed alt of the liar either.
It is very disappointing that this is what the admins consider just.


