Sad sad news about young people dying suddenly in America and Canada

@SW-User The tens of thousands of pages on the vaccine trials, begrudgingly released to date into the public domain by Pfizer (remember how they wanted to release them over 75 years? but a court order forced them to release them by something like 10,000 pages per month, starting last year) have shown that there were hundreds of serious side effects (adverse events) occurring during the vaccine clinical trials, and therefore known to Pfizer before they received the green light to roll out the vaccine for all, to the chorus of "100% safe, 100% effective" from health authorities, governments and TV and press media.

Among these worryingly numerous serious adverse events was DEATH. Which could be caused, for example, by myocardia. One might expect heart attacks among older people, but not among the young, active, fit population. This is a new phenomenon.

The vaccinated liquid, instead of staying in the arm, travels all round the body, lodging in main organs, creating everywhere the famous spike protein that has a destructive effect, not only on invading viruses, but also on our own cells, blood vessels, etc.

It appears that the destructive effect is particularly nasty in the areas related to conception and pregnancy.

@WalterF [quote]The vaccinated liquid, instead of staying in the arm, travels all round the body, lodging in main organs, creating everywhere the famous spike protein that has a destructive effect, not only on invading viruses, but also on our own cells, blood vessels, etc.

It appears that the destructive effect is particularly nasty in the areas related to conception and pregnancy.[/quote]

Really? Please send me a link

Once again, none of these deaths can be definitively linked to vaccines. People just assume they are with no evidence. It's going to get to the stage where anyone who dies after being vaccinated, be it 20 minutes or 20 years later, the vaccine will be blamed.

Because here's the thing. Do you think it might be COVID-19 ITSELF and not the vaccine that's causing these early deaths? Because the COVID-19 virus appears to be able to increase the stickiness of the blood and increase ... the likelihood of blood clot formation. It seems to stir up inflammation in the blood vessels. It seems to also cause in some people an overwhelming stress—whether it’s related directly to the infection or situations around the infection—that can also cause a spike in blood pressure.

Btw my parents have had 6 boosters. They're still fine.

@WalterF [image deleted]

@WalterF Take a guess what the most serious side effect was for NOT being vaxxed?

[image deleted]

@WalterF P.S. None of these deaths are definitively linked to the vaccine. You just assume they are.

@MaBalzEsHari Proof? - other than that banal generalisation touted by all the voices we hear on the media, that "millions of lives have been saved by the vaccine."

@SW-User I obviously didn't write the principal part of the post. I posted it because it corresponds to ongoing research and summarises it in the context of reproduction.

@MaBalzEsHari Do remember the most ironic example of wordplay in the whole universe:

the letters of CONSPIRACY THEORIST, rearranged, make exactly CENSORSHIP ATROCITY

By the way, "conspiracy theorist" is fact-checker language for "conspiracy realist".

@SW-User I am delighted that your parents are fine. I am pleased that a lot of people have so far shown no reaction. My wife is among these. (She stopped after first booster, judging that enough was enough.)

But how many lives have been ruined, not by this aggravated flu, but by the injected potions? Far too many. In other contexts, they would have withdrawn the product after a single death. But not here. Why?

@WalterF

@SW-User I'm great so far, thanks anyway. It all holds together. Our little conspiracies are rock solid- whereas the Great Vaccine Narrative is getting shakier and shakier as more TRUTH penetrates to the world through the Big Pharma / Big Gov / Big Media smokescreen

@WalterF Of course, of course. Well, sadly the scientific evidence is also rock solid and has completely debunked your little conspiracies time and time again. But of course, no amount of proof will convince you. Sadly you have gone so far down the rabbit hole that you can no longer separate fact from fiction.

I feel for you and your family.

@WalterF Why? Because there is not a single shred of evidence to show that lives have been "ruined" as a result of the vaccine. I know a LOT of people, and so do my parents and brothers. As far as any of us can tell, NONE of their neighbours, friends, or friends of friends have suffered any adverse reaction worse than an aching arm and an occasional fever.
As far as the [i]effectiveness[/i] of the vaccine goes, that's a different matter entirely seeing as my brother has had covid at least 5 times despite having three boosters.

@SW-User You are relying on the people you know for evidence of no vaccine damage. I don't think I know anybody myself who has suffered from it.

But at a wider level, there is personal evidence galore - personal testimonies of people who have suffered life-changing damage. If you never see those distressing reports, it's because you limit yourself to what the media want you to know / believe. This is sad. Explore for yourself! don't be led solely by those who spoonfeed you the same old 24/7 message!

I am glad to hear that you yourself have "debunked" (to use your word) the universally pushed promise that the jabs would protect you from getting covid. Apparently, they can give a degree of protection, which lasts... a few weeks. Worth the risk? not in my book.

@WalterF Look. I have explored for myself. First, that is the crux of the problem. If you want to "Explore for yourself" it is because some charismatic nutjob online has invited you to do so. And when you "explore for yourself" you are going to ignore all the scientific, peer-reviewed papers that testify again and again to the relative safety of the vaccines because this nutjob told you to.

Nevertheless, I have explored for myself. These emotive testimonies about people they know who have died or people who have supposedly been crippled by the vaccine, there is almost always no definitive evidence to link the vaccine to anything. Most of these testimonies have happened weeks or months after taking the vaccine. There is NOTHING they can do to prove the vaccine was responsible.

FOR SURE there are side effects, FOR SURE there are deaths. But SERIOUS side-effects or deaths are rare, just like any vaccine. And I'm sorry but all this bullshit about mRNA vaccines altering DNA is a crock of shit. That has been debunked so many times it's not worth bothering about.

@SW-User Wrong.

I really resent your affirmation that "some nutjob online" has invited people like me to explore. This means that you consider that anybody who questions The Narrative is educationally subnormal ( to use an old-fashioned term that would probably nowadays get you thrown in prison).

No, sir. You're so misguided, so blinkered.

But it's not my problem.

Good luck to you, in every way. I sincerely hope everything turns out well for you.

@WalterF No, it means that people who "think for themselves" are desperate to prove they are smarter than everyone else, and so will latch onto anything that reinforces their beliefs. Exactly like you. And it is a belief before you accuse me of also "believing" the vaccine is safe. The reason? There is scientific evidence proving the vaccines' safety. There is no scientific evidence suggesting it's causing millions of unexplained deaths worldwide. It's what you want to believe. It's called faith.

@SW-User Sorry, strictly not interested in trying to prove I'm "smarter than anyone else". That really could not be further from my mind. So you've got it wrong again.

My concern is to help people to realise they've been persuaded into taking an untested, potentially dangerous and largely unnecessary medication, SO THAT, NEXT TIME, THEY MAY PLACE LESS TRUST IN THOSE THAT GOVERN US.

@WalterF Well, my concern is that you don't seem to realise that the vaccine was neither untested nor largely unecessary. It could of course be potentially dangerous, just like any vaccine I'll give you that, but not to the extent you believe.

Let's leave it there.

@SW-User Final comment - serious question: HOW can a universally prescribed hastily-developed vaccine be declared safe for pregnant women and their babies? or for people taking other strong medication where drug-drug interaction could be harmful?

Answer: it can't. This was a shot in the dark. But they maintained the united front that it's GREAT for EVERYONE, and necessary!

The testing idea falls at the first hurdle.

@WalterF Final comment:

If you say so.

Of course pregnant women were excluded from the trials; it would have been unethical.

BUT!

The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists said that the vaccine is “the best way to protect against the known risks of COVID-19 in pregnancy for both women and babies, including admission of the woman to intensive care and premature birth of the baby”.

AND The Royal College of Midwives said that pregnant women are “more at risk of becoming seriously unwell if they catch the [Covid-19] virus” and so “getting the vaccine is the best way to protect yourself and your baby from the effects of COVID-19”.

I will agree that initial advice was for pregnant and breastfeeding women not to get it, plus not enough meaningful data could be extracted from the apparently 57 unintended pregnancies during the trials. But there has since been a meta-analysis of loads of studies confirming that the vaccine is safe and is associated with a reduction in stillbirths.

I will remind you that a meta-analysis has to be held up to the most rigorous peer-reviewed scrutiny. But then, I don't expect you to believe it.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-30052-w

@SW-User Nothing rigorous at all about this vaccine rollout and enforcement. All rules were bent, from the modification of the WHO definition of a pandemic, to the stupid system of recording any death within 3o days of a positive covid "test" as a "covid death", even if it was a road accident or falling off a roof or dying from cancer.

All parameters were played with, to give inflated numbers and increase the FEAR and the motivation to get injected

@WalterF So you haven't read the study I linked to you. Fair enough.