This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
That the current scientific method is the most reliable.
We just are not willing to find anything better.
We just are not willing to find anything better.
robertsnj · 56-60, M
@DeWayfarer fantastic! you found something better--help us with your better meathod!
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@robertsnj see! You don't even want try yourself.
Let someone else do it for you. Defeatism!
BTW I said WE. Meaning the whole scientific community! Still no one WANTS to try.
It takes the whole community to even try. Much less agree on anything.
Let someone else do it for you. Defeatism!
BTW I said WE. Meaning the whole scientific community! Still no one WANTS to try.
It takes the whole community to even try. Much less agree on anything.
wildbill83 · 36-40, M
@DeWayfarer actually, they keep changing the definition of scientific method; The original was that something had to be observable, testable, and repeatable to be considered scientific
of course, that didn't bode well for big bang, evolution, global warming, and all the other bullshit, so they changed it... 🤔
of course, that didn't bode well for big bang, evolution, global warming, and all the other bullshit, so they changed it... 🤔
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@wildbill83 I know. It needs to be modernized better. With more input from a wider community. You limit the consensus, it's no longer the whole community.
You're wrong still about the big bang, evolution and climate change. Your religious fetish wasn't ever included in the scientific community to begin with.
This is why you're so upset about that change!
Your fetish was making inroads into what really was the scientific community, with it's [u][b]sophistry[/b][/u]. Why they limited the consensus so drastically, to excize religious sophistry.
Religion, sciences and politics [b][u]do not mix[/u][/b]!
At least they did that much. Yet they forgot the other sciences like logic and assigned them into other fields, like philosophy.
Huge mistake!
Logic is a science on its own. It's frequently used in computers and electronics! See how well sophistric faith works in either field with it's unending loop type of thinking‽
It simply can not, due to it's illogic!
Yet this limiting is why I had a Mormon for a logic instructor, as well as for philosophy.
For all the insanity, religion doesn't belong in philosophy either. Let alone science!
Most especially not logic despite religious sophistry, which the Christians stole from the pagan Greeks!
BTW Faith is sophistry! It goes in circles, eats itself and never ever ends. Which is a method to confuse the issue or rhetoric. AKA sophistry!
The whole concept was stolen from the pagan Greeks! Your so beloved anti religious and homosexual Aristotle was a master in sophistry! The father of Aristocrats!
Does that not question the validity of your own religion and political views, both? And why neither doesn't belong in any form of science?
You're wrong still about the big bang, evolution and climate change. Your religious fetish wasn't ever included in the scientific community to begin with.
This is why you're so upset about that change!
Your fetish was making inroads into what really was the scientific community, with it's [u][b]sophistry[/b][/u]. Why they limited the consensus so drastically, to excize religious sophistry.
Religion, sciences and politics [b][u]do not mix[/u][/b]!
At least they did that much. Yet they forgot the other sciences like logic and assigned them into other fields, like philosophy.
Huge mistake!
Logic is a science on its own. It's frequently used in computers and electronics! See how well sophistric faith works in either field with it's unending loop type of thinking‽
It simply can not, due to it's illogic!
Yet this limiting is why I had a Mormon for a logic instructor, as well as for philosophy.
For all the insanity, religion doesn't belong in philosophy either. Let alone science!
Most especially not logic despite religious sophistry, which the Christians stole from the pagan Greeks!
BTW Faith is sophistry! It goes in circles, eats itself and never ever ends. Which is a method to confuse the issue or rhetoric. AKA sophistry!
The whole concept was stolen from the pagan Greeks! Your so beloved anti religious and homosexual Aristotle was a master in sophistry! The father of Aristocrats!
Does that not question the validity of your own religion and political views, both? And why neither doesn't belong in any form of science?