Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

It is ok to judge someone but over time not one incident.

To be fair, it depends on the [b]incident[/b]. Some things tell you exactly who a person is, and it’s not wise to wait until they do something [b]worse[/b]. 🙁
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@bijouxbroussard Maybe we can make exceptions for John Wilkes Booth and Lee Harvey Oswald?😷
@whowasthatmaskedman Lol, for example. 😅
SW-User
I disagree. Sometimes all you have is that one moment to show someone whether or not you’re someone they need to avoid for their own sake.
Jenny1234 · 51-55, F
Never judge over one incident
MarineBob · 56-60, M
@Jenny1234 Luckily smolletts was 5 incidents
SW-User
I think it's really more about judging a person's actions, thoughts and ideas.
I judge what find good or not... everyone does in some way.
One incident may be enough if it gets to you in a certain way. Other times, what you see on a more regular basis will tell if the person is more likely to be the same all the time.
Casheyane · F
It's better at least, yes. But I fear even if we do it over time, we might miss out on several things. Like people changing. Of course it'd take sonething really big to change someone so quickly.
nedkelly · 61-69, M
Everyone is judgemental and over time you will get a better understanding of the person
Reject · 26-30, M
It’s never okay to judge, period.
MarineBob · 56-60, M
Smollett is a race baiter and premeditates his crimes.
baldwin is against the 2nd amendment but will make movies showing that guns are cool
LucyFuhr · 56-60, F
That's something people need to decide for themselves; "judging", whether it's some [b][i]one[/i][/b] or some [b][i]thing[/i][/b], is part of self-preservation and survival.
DDonde · 31-35, M
Depends on the kind of the incident

 
Post Comment