Do you think circumcised looks better?

@nadine And the feel?

@mathsman Most intact men look cut when they are erect. Hence I cannot makes sense of any claim that one style looks better than the other. The tip of the penis, the Ground Zero of male desire, slowly loses sensitivity with age (this fact has yet to be properly researched). Common sense suggests that circumcision speeds up this process. The main sexual drawback of circumcision is that the procedure removes the foreskin and vandalises the frenulum, both of which being exquisitely sensitive structures (this too has been very badly researched).

@consa01 Oh yes, I agree about adult foreskin.
That's why I like young ones.
My frenulum is still very responsive.
And my perineum.

@mathsman I have lost so much sensitivity, despite being intact, that I shudder when I think what my equipment would be like had I been cut like nearly all American boys born in my place and time.

@consa01 Sorry to hear that

@mathsman @mathsman This loss of sensation became salient only around age 60, and soared when my cancerous prostate was removed a few years ago. With the help of a lot of porn and masturbation, I can still get an erection of sorts. If I were cut, I suspect that my ability to be sexual would have shut down completely by now.

@consa01 Who knows?

Aesthetically, my wife preferrs the circumcised member .

@devonman Does she appreciate that both kinds of penises often look very much alike when they are both erect?