Rabscuttle · 41-45
Sounds like someone's been reading Van Daniken- or, more hopefully, Diamond. But it shouldn't amaze you; ingenuity is often the very product of limited resources.
Ever see the movie The Fifth Element? No, it's not about boron, though I made that joke dozens of times. A friend kept pestering me to watch it, and when I finally did, my first thought was "this feels like it was written by a twelve-year-old" (funnily enough, I'd later learn that the writer (and director) actually DID start writing it when he was twelve, so I wasn't wrong!). I meant that in the best possible way, though: there's a scene in the beginning where a professor is exploring the ruins of an ancient Egyptian temple in 1914. Now, how, in that position, would you illuminate the building?
Electricity is out; there's nothing like a power grid there, in the middle of the empty desert. Flashlights did exist at the time, but the quality was lousy (that's where the "flash" in the name comes from). Building a fire risks smoke damage, and torches have the same problem on a lower scale, plus the risk of flaming pitch falling on your hands (and a torch of the type Hollywood likes to show you would only last about 20-30 minutes before burning out). So what does he do? He hires a local boy to set outside, holding a shiny plate to reflect the sunlight into the structure.
That's the kind of cunning that only a child would come up with- the modern world has given us so much by way of convenience that many of us struggle to actually think problems through, but children don't have access to all that we do.
Ever see the movie The Fifth Element? No, it's not about boron, though I made that joke dozens of times. A friend kept pestering me to watch it, and when I finally did, my first thought was "this feels like it was written by a twelve-year-old" (funnily enough, I'd later learn that the writer (and director) actually DID start writing it when he was twelve, so I wasn't wrong!). I meant that in the best possible way, though: there's a scene in the beginning where a professor is exploring the ruins of an ancient Egyptian temple in 1914. Now, how, in that position, would you illuminate the building?
Electricity is out; there's nothing like a power grid there, in the middle of the empty desert. Flashlights did exist at the time, but the quality was lousy (that's where the "flash" in the name comes from). Building a fire risks smoke damage, and torches have the same problem on a lower scale, plus the risk of flaming pitch falling on your hands (and a torch of the type Hollywood likes to show you would only last about 20-30 minutes before burning out). So what does he do? He hires a local boy to set outside, holding a shiny plate to reflect the sunlight into the structure.
That's the kind of cunning that only a child would come up with- the modern world has given us so much by way of convenience that many of us struggle to actually think problems through, but children don't have access to all that we do.
Abundance can lead to complacency and mental laziness leading to slow cognitive pacing. By design, the brain wants to conserve energy and avoid thinking if it doesn't have to. But the second scarcity hits, it triggers survival mode, forcing us to innovate and do whatever it takes to get out of the situation. Limited resources force focus, abundance keeps us comfortable. When brain coasts to autopilot, it makes lazy and sometimes stupid choices.
Humans are weird
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
They had achievements but those were brutal times for most people.
wildbill83 · 41-45, M
they weren't smarter, they just had more cheap labor and didn't have all the building codes/regulations we do today...lol
FreestyleArt · 36-40, M
and this life continues to get worse and sucks like ass
Northwest · M
Modern people cannot accept that ancient humans were so much smarter
There's absolutely no reason to believe that ancient humans were smarter than humans today. No one, with the exception of the "fringe" element, claims that Pyramids were built by aliens,
Scholars are uncertain whether Homer was a real person, and the ancient idea of a single author behind the Iliad and the Odyssey is largely considered a mystery or a fictional narrative.
It also looks you don't really understand how AI works.
CrazyMusicLover · 31-35
Also, something made by AI must be automatically something bad but if a human uses a computer software to create exactly the same thing with exactly the same result, it's all okay. 😆 Apparently, not all pixels are equal. People are ridiculous.






