Love that stays, Even if they don’t.

soulmates don’t meet by accident. they come into your life like they’ve always been there, their presence feels familiar, like a home you’ve never visited, but always belonged to. you don’t just meet them, you recognize them. but no one tells you that soulmates don’t always stay. sometimes, they’re only meant to teach you, to show you a part of yourself you didn’t know existed. to light a fire in you that will keep burning long after they’ve gone. it’s heart breaking isn’t it? to love someone so deeply only to watch them leave. you tell yourself it wasn’t meant to be, but deep down you wonder why fate would bring them to you, only to take them away. the truth is, soulmates aren’t about forever. they’re about impact, they’re the ones who change you, who break you open, who shows you what love can feel like, even if it doesn’t last.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

RisingMorningStar7 · 36-40, M

that's not a soulmate, soul mates are predestine people and sometimes they meet. Believing in soulmates it magical and has to do with the highest admiration of a divine and pure feeling of encounter. People want soul mates but they themselves are depraved. Better yet if your soul mate is poor will you take him? if not you don't want a soulmate because soulmates are people who reflect from each other like two birds flying on the wild.

dlubsp · 18-21, F

@RisingMorningStar7 I really appreciate your perspective, and I agree that the idea of soulmates carries something divine, pure, and almost magical. What I meant in my post is that sometimes people enter our lives and feel like soulmates because of the depth of connection they bring, even if they’re not meant to stay forever. For me, it’s less about permanence and more about the impact — the way they awaken something inside us that lingers long after they’re gone. I think both views can be true, and that’s what makes the idea of soulmates so profound.

RisingMorningStar7 · 36-40, M

@dlubsp A soulmate is much strange encounter. I think what you describe lovers not soulmates.

dlubsp · 18-21, F

@RisingMorningStar7 I think soulmates can take many forms — some stay forever, and some only pass through to awaken us.

RisingMorningStar7 · 36-40, M

@dlubsp Is not soul mates are predestine people and for some reasoned up meeting each other in the world. A soul mate doesn't need to to put effort both people have to have some form of uprightness and have high esteem of love without not saying many words.

dlubsp · 18-21, F

@RisingMorningStar7 I see what you mean, and I respect that view — the idea of soulmates as predestined and effortless is beautiful. But I also feel that even the deepest connections still require presence and care. To me, love is not just fate, but also the way two souls choose to honor the bond they share.

RisingMorningStar7 · 36-40, M

@dlubsp I can see that but that is more like Lovers. I been in Love with many girls and I felt other who I was fond of more like soulmates. Because we share a lot of things in common. But, I think soulmates how people describe is at a lowest common denominator . Soulmates to me fall natural like puzzle instead of trying to fit the puzzle. I think that what wrong with people they confuse incompatibility with diversity and its not. People could work around things but I think soulmates don't and naturally fall in place like puzzle, diverse in something but still connect perfect, without adjusting.

dlubsp · 18-21, F

@RisingMorningStar7 I see what you mean about soulmates being like puzzle pieces that fit perfectly, but I wonder — isn’t that a bit idealistic? Even the strongest bonds face challenges, and sometimes what makes a connection truly powerful isn’t how effortlessly it fits, but how both souls choose to grow together through the imperfections. If everything were too easy, would it really test the depth of love?

RisingMorningStar7 · 36-40, M

@dlubsp is better to enjoy a soccer game with someone who enjoys as well or someone who doesn't it. I don't believe love is idealistic, people called idealistic what they can't achieve. You can find real soulmate stories online. Like about a woman who saw a guy she fell in love for and crossing path again in the park. To be into soulmates their has to be a sense of purity and love in higher dimension invoking the divine. if such things are magical it will invoke a invisible force I used to called it the universe.

dlubsp · 18-21, F

@RisingMorningStar7 I agree that sharing common ground can make a bond feel effortless, like watching a soccer game with someone who loves it too. But isn’t the depth of love proven when it extends beyond shared hobbies or surface-level compatibility? If soulmates are truly divine, then they shouldn’t just mirror our preferences — they should challenge us, transform us, and sometimes even come in forms we don’t expect. To say that love must always be pure, easy, and magical risks ignoring the reality that even the strongest connections require growth, patience, and sometimes struggle. Otherwise, what you call a soulmate might simply be comfort, not transformation. If soulmates only feel easy and perfect, then that’s comfort, not love — real soulmates transform you, and transformation is never effortless.