@
helsbels in most cases, it would make sense… but not when scientific meanings of words had been created and used long before..
And then suddenly people who probably failed science class came up with an idea to make those sane words mean something else that make it sound like it’s related when it’s not..
Let’s put it this way for example.. if you were to walk around and ask a majority of todays high schoolers what the scientific definition of asexual means.. would they give you the correct answer? No they wouldn’t.. and therein lies the problem..
Hence not only is it objectively stupid for whoever came up with it.. but it’s also making people stupid..
Have you read the comments here on this thread? They’re full of contradictions because they can’t even clearly define something.. when someone can’t clearly define something In a discussion or argument.. 🙄 you’re not going to convince me that they’re on the more intelligent side of the spectrum..
Scientific explanation = Clear, defined, and wrapped in a neat little bow.
Everyone else defining it with new age understanding for a representation of what it should be in humans = Unclear, accounts of definition for it contradicts one another because of that lack of clarity, no actual understanding in a unified form.
🙄 people can drink their stupid juice if they want. And these same people will tell you they believe in science but let it be known that only @
MissNoahLenFoxx gave the actual scientific answer.. 😒 so here’s a point to make, if everyone can’t define it, should they even be pretending that they’re intelligent enough to understand it? Should it even have the label they gave it since it makes no sense that it has no actual definition for it? Yes words can have multiple meanings but they’re given clear multiple definitions for their use when they do have them… how come in this case it’s not so clear then?? 😒