Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I don't buy the whole "deadlines help against procrastination and increase productivity " argument

Most procrastination is the result of lack in sufficient conviction about the importance of your actions.

Conviction requires more efforts and time. So of course, a system that is profit ~oriented would take a moral shortcut.

I think every person has an individual approach that works for them best to increase their own productivity. Not everyone has the resources to find it and establish it in their lives. And most environments won't permit it even after you figured out your own needs, inclinations and rhythms.


In a world where stress is increasingly a dominant variable in the development of chronic illnesses, the initial argument is more of an enablement of extreme objectification than a solution.

Life quality should take precedence over profit defined productivity.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
jehova · 36-40, M
I agree deadlines are artificial and counterintuitive. Indeed when i was a government employee. Deadlines were really just submission deadlines. A step in a process; it got to the boss (was postmarked on\by the deadline. It still needed to be proofread, for typos, clarity, and compared with current regulations (for compliance). Even after all of that three signatures and additional adherance guidlines (protocols) had to be followed prior to going to the head of the department just to receive their stamp of approval and final signature.
I worked in the state education department!
Any mistake in that process it goes back to me (at the beginning of the proccess) to be restarted and examined for adherence.