This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly AdultFun
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

If I hear feminine energy one more time...

She smiles so wide I kind of just want to shove shit in her mouth so she shuts the fuck up.

Feminine/masculine polarity is a bunch of "woo" science.

[media=https://youtu.be/Oog28fB8G7M]
SW-User Best Comment
Sorry, I couldn't get past kombucha 🤣
SatanBurger · 36-40, FVIP
@SW-User Don't blame you 🤣
SW-User
@SatanBurger thank you for BC

Rolexeo · 26-30, M
You don't think it makes sense from an evolutionary standpoint? It's just sexual dimorphism really
Rolexeo · 26-30, M
@SatanBurger It's changing cause of sjws, the change is the socially constructed part of it
SatanBurger · 36-40, FVIP
@Rolexeo Anything that has that much social pressure on women to conform to traditional gender roles isn't natural. If you have to force a narrative and caste negative stereotypes upon women in the workforce to prop up that narrative, it is not natural and largely socially constructed for that reason. No "SJW" (your word not mine,) forces women to be firefighters for example, yet there are a few of them.

Therefore the concept of feminine and masculine polarity is largely socially constructed for the reason above. You have to make up a story in order to prop up a narrative that women have feminine energy and therefore only do stereotypically female things and all males do stereotypically male things. This is a story, it's an invention much like you are writing a book. This view becomes socially accepted, this is a social construct.
Rolexeo · 26-30, M
@SatanBurger You really aren't seeing the contradictions in what you're saying at all lol.

1."Social constructs" are formed the way they are because of how people already think. You keep using it as if it means random and arbitrary when that's not it at all. You're just denying the genetic component.

2. These social constructs are conveniently consistent across all cultures and throught every time period.

3. Feminism has been on the rise for decades now. And yet the trades and the hard sciences are lacking when it comes to female representation. Why do you think that is?

4. Why aren't women thirsting over short twinks with round faces? Is them being more attracted to traditionally masculine men also a social construct?
Heavenlywarrior · 36-40, M
Abba and preach funny as hell
SatanBurger · 36-40, FVIP
@Heavenlywarrior Hehe yeah they really are
ViciDraco · 36-40, M
Feminine energy? Masculine energy? Ain't got spare energy to put towards worrying about that. I'm struggling to pass as a functional human over here. Just going to focus on being me.
SatanBurger · 36-40, FVIP
@ViciDraco Yeah same here, people think way too much about stuff. Though every time she said "energy" I kind of wanted to slap her lmfao.

If you "have" to experiment on your spouse as you feel they're not masculine enough for you, you probably shouldn't be with someone you feel like you have to force to change in the first place.

That's just too much I think.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
MartinTheFirst · 26-30, M
@SatanBurger no I just clicked on a random time stamp and that happened.. watch the video you tell us to watch, maybe? 🤣

Either way I jumped around a bit and if the goal is to make a man feel more dominant and appreciated then what I heard her say was right. It's not science, it's just... fact. Encourage a certain type of behaviour in a person and they will respond to it
SatanBurger · 36-40, FVIP
@MartinTheFirst There's no such thing as feminine or masculine energy. For instance if men cry then technically you're in feminine energy if we're being stereotypical here. I personally don't believe it but let's just argue this for a moment.

That's why there's no such thing as strictly male energy or strictly female energy because there's more than one side to a person and each of those energies is highly dependent on the person's experiences and perception which shapes them. Much less to the fact that while emotions are real in what we experience, it's not indicative of reality. We attach things to emotions by giving it meaning so in a sense no such thing as feminine or masculine energy.
MartinTheFirst · 26-30, M
@SatanBurger agreed, feminine and masculine energy is not any type of charge or anything of a physical nature (although it can result from physical things), it's a term she has made up, but what it represents is real. Ignoring the fact that we have chosen to describe it with made up words, what we're describing is real. Masculine and feminine behaviour exists, it's not as shallow as she defines it to be but it does exist from the fact that we're built differently. We're different in our figure, in our chemistry and in our brains. Of course males and females within their respective groups differ among themselves as well, but less so within the group than between the group generally speaking.

I would say that the class of femininity contains the trait of showing a higher degree of empathy and emotional expression. This is feminine because it is determined largely by your temper; with a lower temper you're likely to be more attentive of other people's emotions and have more patience, to delve into art for example.

The most robust association between a specific gene and aggression in humans is the monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) gene.

Men – who commit nearly all extreme acts of violence (sorry guys) – can have a high-functioning or low-functioning version of the gene. (Women can also have an intermediate version.)

The relative importance of this gene comes from its role in regulating the functioning of neurotransmitters (such as serotonin and dopamine), which help regulate emotions.

Several studies have found that men with the low-functioning version of the gene are especially likely to engage in violence and other antisocial behaviour if they were exposed to childhood abuse.

Even more recently, psychology experiments from two independent laboratories found that research participants with the low-functioning allele were more aggressive than people with the high-functioning variant, but interestingly only when provoked. What is perhaps remarkable is that these research participants were mentally healthy university students.

These findings suggest that people with the low-functioning variant of the MAOA gene may be less proficient in controlling anger and aggressive behaviour. But our understanding of the importance of control, when it comes to a genetic predisposition toward aggression, is incomplete.

 
Post Comment