Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE 禄

Why some people are very smart yet very dumb? Seen some people get Bachelor's and Masters's degrees but throw a fit like a mentally delayed kid.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies 禄
thisgenericnamehere36-40, M
I think you are confusing types of intelligence. Also the more you go forward in academia the more focused your work is. My Masters is in predictive analytics it's an advanced degree, I will still lose my phone when it's right next to me if it's playing music...so. 馃ぃ
dancingtongue80-89, M
@thisgenericnamehere Exactly right: different types of intelligence and unfortunately too many who specialize forget basics, or think they are now above them. My late wife managed a temporary agency in a university town for a while. She would come home frustrated, saying I have all these jobs for file clerks and basic office skills but the only applicants I have are Ph.D. candidates and most of them can't even alphabetize.
thisgenericnamehere36-40, M
@dancingtongue That's an oddly specific answer but yes. I have a very specific intelligence, logical and rational, suits my profession. People with tactile intelligence your builders or dancers or craftspeople are superhuman to me. I can do that too (save the dancing) it's just harder.
dancingtongue80-89, M
@thisgenericnamehere And the true geniuses in my book have always been those who can excel in several fields; the Leonardo da Vinci's, the Ben Franklins, the Thomas Jeffersons.
thisgenericnamehere36-40, M
@dancingtongue Mmm. There I disagree. Stephen Hawking for example specialized in a very very very specific field of a particular type of physics but he was a genius too.
dancingtongue80-89, M
@thisgenericnamehere Bad terminology on my part. I certainly never meant to imply that the Hawkings and Einsteins of the world are not geniuses. Probably should have said "the truly remarkable people" rather than geniuses.
thisgenericnamehere36-40, M
@dancingtongue Fair, I think it also has to do with their time period. Your Ben Franklin of today would be able to focus on a single subject because the volume of knowledge available is orders of magnitude bigger. You had to dabble because the fields they worked in were comparatively shallow.
dancingtongue80-89, M
@thisgenericnamehere Very true that it was easier in that sense. OTOH, to break new ground and be an innovator in those eras -- and now I am thinking of Galileo and Copernicus -- was to invite ridicule and worse.