Would this make a cool tattoo?

Poll - Total Votes: 14

Nah, that's a shit tattoo. :(

Eh, it's decent. :|

Go for it, kid! :)

You can only vote on one answer.

Not the entire thing, just one "branch" (the part on the right side, basically). (I'm not planning to get this or any other tattoo until I am above the age of 18.)

Top | Newest First | Oldest First

SW-User

I was all set to slate this, but actually it's really pretty!

Ssnsnsmssjsmsm

Aw, thank you. 😊

DanniRoxi · 26-30, F

I'm gonna be honest and say no. I have a few tattoos so I know from experience. As long as you don't make the branch as wavy or brush like then you should be fine. But doing the whole brush look is going to take a lot of time and because of it's wavy appearance, you might not know something is wrong with it. You might not know that the ink on your skin becomes drys out from a lack of moisture in the air or if it fades because it will already look faded. See what I mean? It might be wise to do it but not make it look as wavy or faded.

Ssnsnsmssjsmsm

I don't think it'll take an excessive amount of time. It's going to be [i]pretty[/i] small. The brush look is kinda why I like the design in the first place, although it doesn't necessarily have to be wavy. The rest of it can easily be resolved if I consult my tattoo artist about it. No biggie.

SweetMae · 70-79, F

You must imagine tattoos changing and spreading as you age....

Ssnsnsmssjsmsm

It's probably going to be on my lower leg, and if I keep fairly fit I think it'll be alright. I'm not planning to be a model when I'm a senior citizen anyway, so it's alright.

SweetMae · 70-79, F

@Killers: That is good. You are thinking ahead.

CaptainCanadia · 41-45, M

Looks cool to me!

Ssnsnsmssjsmsm

Thanks for your feedback! 😄

CaptainCanadia · 41-45, M

I am without tattoos but my wife has like eight, so I'm happy to encourage them in others. :D

Add a comment...