[b]'Lib*ardism by Numbers'[/b] [i]{akin to Painting by Numbers}[/i]
[b][i]I believe - out there - there is such a thing called a 'Lib*ard' User Manual, so please see below, a synopsis for this 'User Manual':[/i][/b]
[i]{it can be used not only for trainee 'Lib*ards', but also for guidance for [b]NORMAL[/b] people who need to be wary of 'Lib*ards' when they escape the basement}[/i]
Ticky Box Exercise 1st:
[b]If you're losing the argument, accuse them of racism[/b] - {the word 'Racist' now superceded by 'White Supremacist'}
🤔 [i]yep, i've done that already[/i] ✅
[b]If you're in a discussion and your opponent makes a mistake - {usually a spelling mistake} -constantly remind them of it - {laughing emoji optional}[/b]
🤔 [i]yep, i've done that already[/i] ✅ {with option as well sometimes}
[i][b]{this is a big one}[/b][/i] [b]Accuse them of lying, but when they ask you to provide evidence of lying - use any, or all of the below:[/b] NB: this can apply to the racism point as well, {please see above} [i] "I can't be bothered right now"[/i]
[i]"If you don't know you've done it, i'm not pointing it out to you"[/i]
🤔 [i]yep, i've done that already[/i] ✅
[b][i]Obviously, this is not an exhaustive list, so please feel free to add your experiences to the list in the comments below and i'll attempt to update the 'User Manual' ... when i CAN be bothered[/i][/b]
***
[b]1st update: [/b][i]{it's a good one}[/i] [i][b]381[/b] combined comments, surpassing my [i]319[/i] total from weeks ago - {but that was on someone elses stream}[/i]
The Lib*ards scurried out of the basement in force - it quickly got bogged down in off-shoots not related to the main topic - {Religion/Secularism/Capitalism} ...
🥹 ...so much so, that i had to point out that this post is not a discussion about Religion: Secularism: Capitalism - {comments can be made about them, to prove a point or whatever}
... it's about 'people' that i call 'Lib*ards' -which is a welding together of 2 words, Liberal and Retard - {and oh boy, the 2nd word was prevalent in abundance} - this group of people that use various techniques to CANCEL people - {CANCEL CULTURE} - that have a different viewpoint to theirs
I had to point out to one 'Lib*ard' CONSTANTLY, that i've never claimed that i said something, when i asked him to provide proof, he stated "you didn't say it literally, but you meant it indirectly" ... [b]WTF[/b]
{i can only assume that what he was get'n at was this 'unconscious bias' nonsense}
... the example above actually proves one technique that i outlined within the 'User Manual' - he [b]DIDN'T[/b] spot the irony in that FACT at all 🤷🏼♂️🤷🏼♂️🤷🏼♂️... so HE couldn't even claim the credit for it being placed in any update.
I had to point out to [b]THREE[/b] idiots that if you want a discussion about anything that's not related to the topic in question, then go right ahead and create a post about it, in your own account - as this is not a post about any of the topics mentioned above
I then got irritated, and i was in 2 minds whether to point it out, but then it dawned on me, if i do point it out, then the title of my post [b]WILL[/b] be proven ...
[b]'Lib*ardism by numbers'[/b] [i]{akin to Painting by numbers}[/i]
Low and behold, TWO of the three idiots used the word 'triggered' {so i predicted what they were going to say, even down to the actual word 'triggered'} ... again, neither of them spotted the irony in that [i]{but, they may not have known what my term means}[/i]
🤔 [b][i]...further updates to follow, thanks for reading[/i][/b] 🤪🤪🤪
... [b][i]QUACK QUACK[/i][/b]
[b]MAJOR UPDATE:[/b]
Losing an argument is not nice, but now this persons threatening me ... 🤷🏼♂️🤷🏼♂️🤷🏼♂️ [b]WTF[/b]
[image removed by staff]
[b]...another update: [/b]
[i][b]This guy is sending messages to himself and technically talking to himself AND admitting he does so ... 🤷🏼♂️🤷🏼♂️🤷🏼♂️ [/b][/i]
[image removed by staff]
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
@LordShadowfire NOPE... if you use phrases like 'embracing the essence' {by the way, that's a euphemism for "i can't find evidence for what i've accused you of" - in your instance, it was 'irony'} ... [removed by staff] ...
... normally, i wait to see a pattern emerging before i commit myself to calling anyone a Lib*ard, but i'll forgo doing that in your instance ...
[b][/b]@LordShadowfire ... so, how's it '[b]IRONY[/b]' ...give a [b]FULL[/b] explaination:
... BECAUSE, for me to have committed 'irony' it would have had to have fallen with ANY definition i gave within my post, as you use it as a point of reference, see below:
[b]If you're losing the argument, accuse them of racism - {the word 'Racist' now superceded by 'White Supremacist'}[/b]
[i]🤔 NOPE, i've haven't done that [/i]✅
[b]If you're in a discussion and your opponent makes a mistake - {usually a spelling mistake} - constantly remind them of it - {laughing emoji optional}[/b]
🤔 NOPE, i've haven't done that [/i]✅
[b]{this is a big one} Accuse them of lying, but when they ask you to provide evidence of lying - use any, or all of the below: NB: this can apply to the racism point as well, {please see above}[/b]
🤔 NOPE, i've haven't done that [/i]✅
... you see, you have ALREADY admitted that i've done it in "...essence..." because you CAN'T find evidence for it ...i've even looked at my 'update' and anything i've talked about, 'irony' STILL doesn't rear it's head does it ... 🤷🏼♂️🤷🏼♂️🤷🏼♂️
...rather than type it AGAIN, i'll copy & paste our previous inter-action to show what you've actually just done ... sorry, [b]ATTEMPTED[/b] to do ...
[i]BigGuy2 · 26-30, M @LordShadowfire NOPE... if you use phrases like 'embracing the essence' {by the way, that's a euphemism for "i can't find evidence for what i've accused you of" - in your instance, it was 'irony'} ... then YOU are a Lib*ard ...[/i]
+ 0 · Reply · [b]5 h[/b] · Edit ·
{note the time above}
You'll be glad to know that the 'technique' you've just used will be in an up and coming 'update' ... probably titled '[b]derivations[/b]'
...but you can't even claim originality for that, because even within the discussion stream connected to the post, i called out one FOOL for doing a similar derivation as to what you've done ... only he used the word 'indirectly' as opposed to your 'essence'
[b]Oh and by the way, well done for cutting and pasting the inter-action you used as a justification for your accusation, saved me doing it ... 🤪🤪🤪[/b]
@BigGuy2 [quote]so, how's it 'IRONY' ...give a FULL explaination[/quote] It's irony because you hypocritically do what you accuse others of doing, and then cry about it when I point it out.
@LordShadowfire ... well, let them make a comment as to WHY they think that, THEN i'll respond to each and every comnent in turn to explain why it isn't ... can't say any much more than that can I 🤷🏼♂️🤷🏼♂️🤷🏼♂️
... by the way, you've just done ANOTHER 'technique' so well done
@BigGuy2 I observed it. You dismissed all liberals as dismissing anyone who disagrees with them as useless, then dismissed someone who disagreed with you. @LordShadowfire even provided a screenshot of precisely [i]when[/i] you did it, and you continue to lie about it.
@BigGuy2 Yes. You were accused of dismissing those who disagree with you. You subsequently demonstrated that you do in fact dismiss those who disagree with you. Then you lied about it.
@CorvusBlackthorne NOPE ... within the post, i was pointing out how Lib*ards use 'techniques' to cancel people - who's dismissing anybody 🤷🏼♂️🤷🏼♂️🤷🏼♂️
... the wording you've just used - that's another 'technique' used - you try and turn what is claimed back on the person claiming it ...
@BigGuy2 So now you resort to ableist slurs to dismiss me, as you have dismissed others on this thread, all the while pretending you do not dismiss people. Pathetic.
@BigGuy2 Slurs [i]are[/i] hate speech, dumbass. And your hypocrisy is on display for everyone to see. Doing the thing you accuse everyone else of doing. And that's where the irony comes in.
