@SW-User
We've gone over this before
We most certainly have not done any such thing. It's not one of the topics I've discussed with you in the past (only to have you suddenly disappear when reason and evidence become too uncomfortable for you
you don't have the preponderance of evidence on your side
There is no 'preponderance of evidence'...
because there is no evidence
if you are actually arguing that atheists give more to the charity, or participate more, then you are so averse to actual facts...
Let's look at some actual facts...
The not-for-profit micro-lending organisation Kiva reports that the group A+ (atheists, PLUS, sceptics, freethinkers, secular humanists, and non-religious members) has made more than 1 million such loans all over the world to those struggling to overcome poverty, hardship, and despair. Those interest-free loans total over $35,000,000. The largest religion-based Kiva group doesn't even come near that figure.
Around 75% of charitable giving by all Americans… benefits their own places of worship and faith-based charities. A lot of the money isn’t helping the poor and less fortunate. It’s going to the churches... which already enjoy unjustifiable tax exemptions). It's self-serving, self-benefiting,
and used for self-promotionCongregation members feed money back into the very organisation in which they have a vested interest... an organisation which is exempted from financially supporting its own society... money which then pops up as 'rice-bowl Christianity' (Always that same self-promotion).
Shouldn't all churches sell everything they possess and use the funds to unconditionally help the needy of the world? And shouldn't that particularly apply to the really big corporations?
And why doesn't it ever happen?Oh, wait, it
will happen before too long (for sad reasons, unfortunately).
In 2008, Warren Buffett (now 87 years old) was ranked by Forbes as the richest person in the world with an estimated net worth of approximately $US62 billion. In 2009, even after donating tens of billions of dollars to charity, Buffett was ranked as the second richest man in the United States with a net worth of US$37 billion with only Bill Gates ranked higher than Buffett. His net worth had risen to $58.5 billion as of September 2013.
(Note that he didn't use those donated billion for self-promotion of his own business)
Buffett had long stated his intention to give away his fortune to charity, and in June 2006, he announced a plan to give 83% of it to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, making it
the largest charitable donation in history
.
Those huge religious corporation could easily dwarf Buffett's donation...
why don't they?On December 9, 2010, Buffett, Bill Gates signed a promise they called the "Gates-Buffett Giving Pledge", in which they promise to donate to charity at least half of their wealth
Warren Buffett is an atheist
Bill Gates is an atheist
May I draw your attention to my fellow New Zealander Fred Hollows?
He was an ophthalmologist who became known for his work in restoring eyesight (for free) for countless thousands of people in Australia and many other countries. It has been estimated that more than one million people in the world can see today because of initiatives instigated by Hollows, the most notable example being The Fred Hollows Foundation.
He worked tirelessly, and for little reward within Australia's aboriginal communities, and throughout the impoverished regions of the South Pacific.
Fred Hollows was an atheist
This must have really annoyed your magical entity, because Fred Hollows died in 1993 (aged 63) after a 6-year battle with metastatic renal cancer. It's a pity your magical entity is just a fantasy figure, because I'll never have a chance to spit in its face.
I note that, just in case you again encountered actual facts, evidence, and reason in this discussion (you obviously remember the several occasions in the past when that has happened), you tried to write yourself an insurance policy by claiming, apparently on the basis of nothing whatsoever that:
"atheists give because like other secularists, deep down, they know they will be held accountable, and are trying to earn their salvation. Not surprising really..."
You seem not to have seen that this baseless claim is self-defeating, because if that were the reason
they would not be atheists.It seems not to have crossed your mind that the true motive might be
empathythe basis of morality