Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
Top | New | Old
Alyosha · 36-40, M
Why would evolution make something up instead of tracking truth? It's costlier to make something up, and evolution doesn't typically follow the path of greatest resistance. Besides, you people throw out logic as soon as God is brought up. You'll just say all our concepts are inadequate to God and God exists beyond logic. None of you care about logic, or you wouldn't posit something "immaterial" to begin with. Something immaterial is indistinguishable from empty space, and a distinction without a difference means it is nothing. You people worship literal empty space and call it God. It's offensive to any actual God.
DangerGirl · 22-25, F
@Alyosha I agree that nature is efficient. Those like the poster prefer the efficiency of a single word explanation devoid of reason and evidence.
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@Alyosha @DangerGirl
None of you care about logic, or you wouldn't posit something "immaterial" to begin with. Something immaterial is indistinguishable from empty space, and a distinction without a difference means it is nothing. You people worship literal empty space and call it God. It's offensive to any actual God.

God is the Author of logic and reason. You through them both out when you decided that He doesn't live. Produce any kind of evidence that what you believe is actually true, then we'll talk.

Richard65 · M
You believe that God sent his son Jesus to die on the cross for our sins. In other words, God thought is was moral for a completely innocent man to be punished for the sins of others. Do you share that moral principle? If we get our moral guidance from God, then you have to believe that it's acceptable for YOU to go to jail for a crime that I committed.
RachelLia2003 · 22-25, F
ima catholic. end of discussion
Convivial · 26-30, F
Love thy enemy and smite thy enemy seem to present a paradox...
Full of presuppositions. Belief isn’t a choice. You’re either convinced or unconvinced.

The other two "tests" and entire article are available, if you bothered to put up the link. Once again it pits the literal Genesis against evolutionary science.
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
DangerGirl · 22-25, F
Too many biased falsehoods to list.

 
Post Comment