Charity · 70-79
Genesis one: starting when with when God said let there be light _ the Big bang singularity that's when light was created.
And doing side by side research - and the new evidences that scientists have discovered (( mainly plants are several hundred million years older than previously thought, older than the sponge and the Earth was once a water world which makes it older than the Sun)) Genesis 1 and origin of the universe and origin of life on through what science calls evolution coincides with each other.
In this world there is no room for the truth of scripture. When the truth of God is revealed this world is at an end.
And doing side by side research - and the new evidences that scientists have discovered (( mainly plants are several hundred million years older than previously thought, older than the sponge and the Earth was once a water world which makes it older than the Sun)) Genesis 1 and origin of the universe and origin of life on through what science calls evolution coincides with each other.
In this world there is no room for the truth of scripture. When the truth of God is revealed this world is at an end.
CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M
@Charity You lot have an unfortunate habit of never presenting evidence...
redredred · M
Explain these if you can,
Gen 1:25-27 vs Gen 2:18-19
Gen 32:30. vs John 1;18 & 4:12
Acts 2:21 vs Matthew 7:21
Exodus 31:17 & Jer 15:6 vs Isa 40:28
John20:24 vs Matt28:16-17 vs 1Cor 15:5
Gen 22:1 vs James 1:13
Jer 17:4 vs Micah 7:18
Lev 20:13 vs 1Kings 15:11
John 3:13 vs 2Kings 2:11
Jude1:6 vs Job 1:7
Gen 1:25-27 vs Gen 2:18-19
Gen 32:30. vs John 1;18 & 4:12
Acts 2:21 vs Matthew 7:21
Exodus 31:17 & Jer 15:6 vs Isa 40:28
John20:24 vs Matt28:16-17 vs 1Cor 15:5
Gen 22:1 vs James 1:13
Jer 17:4 vs Micah 7:18
Lev 20:13 vs 1Kings 15:11
John 3:13 vs 2Kings 2:11
Jude1:6 vs Job 1:7
Rabscuttle · 41-45
No, Darwin was defeated when he gave into despair after what happened to his daughter. He didn't stray from the truth, because the only way he failed it was in not grasping the subtleties of DNA (which is only fair; it wouldn't be discovered for a century).
You, on the other hand, HAVE strayed away from the truth- and the way, and the light; the Church that Jesus Himself established was ready to accept evolution from the days of ERASMUS Darwin, they just wanted evidence, and when they got it, they accepted the idea- as an idea, if not a doctrine.
Or are you trying to half-ass Biblical literalism? You can't have it both ways.
You, on the other hand, HAVE strayed away from the truth- and the way, and the light; the Church that Jesus Himself established was ready to accept evolution from the days of ERASMUS Darwin, they just wanted evidence, and when they got it, they accepted the idea- as an idea, if not a doctrine.
Or are you trying to half-ass Biblical literalism? You can't have it both ways.
CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M
AdmiralPrune · 46-50, M
LordShadowfire · 51-55, M
Wait, so now it's evidence if I post some random idiot's blog? So if I quote somebody's rantings about finding Bigfoot in the woods, that proves Bigfoot is real, right?
That's the standard you're using.
That's the standard you're using.