redredred · M
Explain these if you can,
Gen 1:25-27 vs Gen 2:18-19
Gen 32:30. vs John 1;18 & 4:12
Acts 2:21 vs Matthew 7:21
Exodus 31:17 & Jer 15:6 vs Isa 40:28
John20:24 vs Matt28:16-17 vs 1Cor 15:5
Gen 22:1 vs James 1:13
Jer 17:4 vs Micah 7:18
Lev 20:13 vs 1Kings 15:11
John 3:13 vs 2Kings 2:11
Jude1:6 vs Job 1:7
Gen 1:25-27 vs Gen 2:18-19
Gen 32:30. vs John 1;18 & 4:12
Acts 2:21 vs Matthew 7:21
Exodus 31:17 & Jer 15:6 vs Isa 40:28
John20:24 vs Matt28:16-17 vs 1Cor 15:5
Gen 22:1 vs James 1:13
Jer 17:4 vs Micah 7:18
Lev 20:13 vs 1Kings 15:11
John 3:13 vs 2Kings 2:11
Jude1:6 vs Job 1:7
View 3 more replies »
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@redredred
Are you seeking the truth or your own justification?
obvious 180° conflicts in the supposed inerrant scripture. Such inconsistencies make the scriptures an unreliable document.
Are you seeking the truth or your own justification?
redredred · M
@GodSpeed63 ultimately Im seeking the abolition of organized superstitions like religion. I need no justification
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@redredred
You just confirmed which one you are seeking. God is not interested in manmade religion as you suppose He is. If you were born again, you'd know that to be true.
ultimately Im seeking the abolition of organized superstitions like religion. I need no justification
You just confirmed which one you are seeking. God is not interested in manmade religion as you suppose He is. If you were born again, you'd know that to be true.
Rabscuttle · 41-45
No, Darwin was defeated when he gave into despair after what happened to his daughter. He didn't stray from the truth, because the only way he failed it was in not grasping the subtleties of DNA (which is only fair; it wouldn't be discovered for a century).
You, on the other hand, HAVE strayed away from the truth- and the way, and the light; the Church that Jesus Himself established was ready to accept evolution from the days of ERASMUS Darwin, they just wanted evidence, and when they got it, they accepted the idea- as an idea, if not a doctrine.
Or are you trying to half-ass Biblical literalism? You can't have it both ways.
You, on the other hand, HAVE strayed away from the truth- and the way, and the light; the Church that Jesus Himself established was ready to accept evolution from the days of ERASMUS Darwin, they just wanted evidence, and when they got it, they accepted the idea- as an idea, if not a doctrine.
Or are you trying to half-ass Biblical literalism? You can't have it both ways.
CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M
Don't mind me. I'm just here to watch you get destroyed again.
AdmiralPrune · 46-50, M
Weapons grade horse shit.
Charity · 70-79
Genesis one: starting when with when God said let there be light _ the Big bang singularity that's when light was created.
And doing side by side research - and the new evidences that scientists have discovered (( mainly plants are several hundred million years older than previously thought, older than the sponge and the Earth was once a water world which makes it older than the Sun)) Genesis 1 and origin of the universe and origin of life on through what science calls evolution coincides with each other.
In this world there is no room for the truth of scripture. When the truth of God is revealed this world is at an end.
And doing side by side research - and the new evidences that scientists have discovered (( mainly plants are several hundred million years older than previously thought, older than the sponge and the Earth was once a water world which makes it older than the Sun)) Genesis 1 and origin of the universe and origin of life on through what science calls evolution coincides with each other.
In this world there is no room for the truth of scripture. When the truth of God is revealed this world is at an end.
CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M
@Charity
READ STUDY WHAT SCIENCE HAD DETERMINED ..... then some people like for others to make it easy for them.
Your writing style is familiar. Were you ever on Yahoo! Answers under the name Fireball?
Charity · 70-79
@redredred wrong light existed at the onset of the Big bang - LIGHT COULD NOT TRAVEL FREELY UNTIL 300,000 YEARS LATER
AI Overview
Light could not travel freely until roughly 300,000 to 380,000 years after the Big Bang because the early universe was an extremely hot, dense plasma that blocked photons from moving more than a tiny fraction of a centimeter before scattering.
Why Light Was Trapped
• Superheated Plasma: For hundreds of thousands of years, the universe was filled with a dense, glowing fog of free electrons and protons.
• Constant Scattering: Photons (particles of light) crashed continuously into these free electrons, meaning space was completely opaque.
Ancient people were not dumb
AI Overview
Light could not travel freely until roughly 300,000 to 380,000 years after the Big Bang because the early universe was an extremely hot, dense plasma that blocked photons from moving more than a tiny fraction of a centimeter before scattering.
Why Light Was Trapped
• Superheated Plasma: For hundreds of thousands of years, the universe was filled with a dense, glowing fog of free electrons and protons.
• Constant Scattering: Photons (particles of light) crashed continuously into these free electrons, meaning space was completely opaque.
Ancient people were not dumb
LordShadowfire · 51-55, M
Wait, so now it's evidence if I post some random idiot's blog? So if I quote somebody's rantings about finding Bigfoot in the woods, that proves Bigfoot is real, right?
That's the standard you're using.
That's the standard you're using.







