Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Belief Follows Truth

Drumheller, Alberta, Canada is considered the “dinosaur capital of the world” because of the number and variety of dinosaur fossils uncovered in this unique site. Well, this site is in the news again—and it’s not just due to the discovery of a near-complete skeleton of a hadrosaur (a “duck-billed dinosaur”), but because of the presence of fossilized soft tissue, including tendons and “dark, scaly skin” with a pebbly texture (like the surface of a basketball).
This incredible find shows the creature had to be buried very quickly, even before the skin could decay! The scientist who discovered the specimen says: I think [the specimen] was covered quite quickly, otherwise it wouldn't be this well preserved . . . You can see some of its vertebrae and tendons, and once you get closer, you can see some of its scales. The dark, scaly skin has a basketball-like texture. This is something really special; you don't find things like this very often out in the field.
Now, what could cover a 13-foot-long dinosaur that quickly (and that deep) for it to be preserved with soft tissue (like skin) still intact? Certainly not the “complex river system” they imagine buried this creature in silt and sandstone millions of years ago. After all, rivers in the present are not constantly burying and fossilizing creatures! So how do they know that must have happened in the past?
They don’t! That’s a worldview interpretation based on their starting point of evolution and millions of years of slow and gradual processes. But this find makes much more sense in a biblical worldview. We understand that this hadrosaur was rapidly and catastrophically buried during the global flood of Noah’s day. It wasn’t sitting around on a riverbank waiting to be buried! It was submerged in a deluge of muddy water and buried by silt and sand, quickly becoming a fossil. (And this wasn’t millions of years ago—it was just around 4,350 years ago.)

Science—including the study of dinosaurs—continues to confirm the history in God’s Word again and again.

Amen to that!! The Truth, the whole Truth, and nothing but the Truth. There is no other.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Lichocolati · 36-40, F
I find it funny that the same people that call us crazy for believing the Bible saying a human wrote it are the same people that believe information they get from scientists who might I add are also humans. Let's not forget that these scientists speculate the age of these said fossils and people call that evidence.
Lynda70 · F
@Lichocolati The difference is that scientists devote a lot of time and effort into proving other scientist wrong. Religious zealots tend to just go along with whatever suits their narrative.
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@Lynda70
The difference is that scientists devote a lot of time and effort into proving other scientist wrong.

That these scientists did, prove that your scientists are wrong.
Lynda70 · F
@GodSpeed63
That these scientists did, prove that your scientists are wrong.
Learn English. That makes no sense at all.
@Lichocolati

I find it funny that the same people that call us crazy for believing the Bible saying a human wrote it are the same people that believe information they get from scientists who might I add are also humans

I think the big difference there is that the people doing science aren't claiming that what they say is what god says.

When we say that the Bible is the work of humanity and not a god, we're simply pointing out that the content of the Bible is of human origin and not divine.
When we say that we trust the conclusions of scientists it is because they
Show
Their
Work.
It is not something that must be relied upon by faith alone.
@Lichocolati Yes, and what I like, is that just because they don't believe it then it didn't happen. 😂
DocSavage · M
@Lichocolati
It sounds like you consider everything scientific here say. How do you judge the credibility of anything by those standards ?
Lichocolati · 36-40, F
@DocSavage My point is a lot of things you know someone taught them to you including science. The spiritual things on the other hand are taught but the experience is separate from what you're taught. It's personal. That is how God is He's personal.
DocSavage · M
@Lichocolati
The point of his post is that he is using a false scientific statement, to promote a premise in the bible. A lie is still a lie , even for Jesus’s sake.
Lichocolati · 36-40, F
@DocSavage Maybe he's just misunderstood.
DocSavage · M
@Lichocolati
No, he’s already been shown the information is wrong. He’s lying.
Not the first time. Read it for yourself.
DocSavage · M
@Lichocolati
I know this might bother you, but there is a big difference between the spiritual world you believe in, and the physical world we all live in. There are some things that did not, could not, and will not happen, no matter how much faith you have.
Godspeed63 likes to think he can change reality by denying it. It’s not gonna happen.
Lichocolati · 36-40, F
@DocSavage I'm unbothered by your opinion because my mind is made up. The spirit realm is real and there's nothing you or anybody can do to change that. I've experienced the spirit realm and that's a fact. Saying it's all in our heads won't change that it's real neither will wishing it away.
Lynda70 · F
@Lichocolati Claiming something is a fact doesn't make it so. If anything, it casts doubt on the veracity of your claim.
DocSavage · M
@Lichocolati
Your comment is irrelevant. Godspeed63, stated that the flood account in the Bible is a factual event. It isn’t .
Regardless of your faith , or spiritual experience, neither changes reality or history.
1dayiWILLbRICH0 · 31-35, F
@Lynda70 but they’ve been proven wrong themselves and also contradicted their previous findings before. If this pandemic wasn’t enough proof that no one really knows what they’re doing completely, I don’t know what more to tell you lol.
1dayiWILLbRICH0 · 31-35, F
@Lichocolati I’m with you on this but what is the point of arguing with people that you already know don’t believe? I have yet to ever see anyones mind be changed through a discussion
Lynda70 · F
@1dayiWILLbRICH0
they’ve been proven wrong themselves and also contradicted their previous findings before.
Scientists amend their theories in the light of new evidence. Religionists stick to the same old dogma by ignoring all the evidence.
Lynda70 · F
@1dayiWILLbRICH0
I have yet to ever see anyones mind be changed through a discussion
Not by discussion but scientists change their minds in the light of new evidence.
1dayiWILLbRICH0 · 31-35, F
@Lynda70 right...Which means there’s room for error, because it’s still mankind who is doing the investigating of the evidence. We only know as much as we’ve evolved enough to know. What if they stopped evolving in the 40’s? Our society would think there isn’t a cure for things that we don’t even go to the doctor for today. Who are we to assume that we’re at the finish point of evolution and discovery? And we all know there’s been countless errors found in the name of science lol. But I get that the majority of people would rather choose to believe in something that has more upfront answers. That does make logical sense and even though I believe in God myself, the fact that people are thinking logically in general is extremely comforting to me. Lol
1dayiWILLbRICH0 · 31-35, F
@Lynda70 scientists change their mind through light of new evidence, yes. The part I’m referring to is that you saying that, with all the facts you have, will not change the minds of the super religious people. And them saying what they say will absolutely not change your mind either. Lol

Like to this day of 28 years of life I have yet to see a religious person in conversation hear the facts and be like “you know what? You’re right. Screw my religion” and vice versa.