Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Belief Follows Truth

The Truth: 1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Genesis 1:1

The idea that the universe began with a big bang is firmly entrenched in the minds of millions of Americans. But the so-called “science” isn’t nearly as settled as most people are led to believe. Many scientists—even atheistic, naturalistic ones—know there are big problems with the idea. And the new images from the James Webb Space Telescope haven’t helped those who cling to the big bang.
According to a news report quoting one physicist (who does not believe the big bang happened,
To everyone who sees them, the new James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) images of the cosmos are beautifully awe-inspiring. But to most professional astronomers and cosmologists, they are also extremely surprising—not at all what was predicted by theory. In the flood of technical astronomical papers published online since July 12, the authors report again and again that the images show surprisingly many galaxies, galaxies that are surprisingly smooth, surprisingly small and surprisingly old. Lots of surprises, and not necessarily pleasant ones. One paper’s title begins with the candid exclamation: “Panic!”
Why do the JWST’s images inspire panic among cosmologists? And what theory’s predictions are they contradicting? The papers don’t actually say. The truth that these papers don’t report is that the hypothesis that the JWST’s images are blatantly and repeatedly contradicting is the Big Bang Hypothesis that the universe began 14 billion years ago in an incredibly hot, dense state and has been expanding ever since. Since that hypothesis has been defended for decades as unquestionable truth by the vast majority of cosmological theorists, the new data is causing these theorists to panic. Answers In Genesis.

As predicted, the big bang never existed in the first place. Truth remains the truth, God, Yahweh, still lives and His Word is still truth. Everyone here knew this scientific truth would come. Praise the Lord for His established truth.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
...Um...even in your own quote it states that they're finding that the galaxies are older than they thought.
So you know...NOT 6,000 years old✌️
@Pikachu He likes the small and limited.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Pikachu @BlueSkyKing
Um...even in your own quote it states that they're finding that the galaxies are older than they thought. So you know...NOT 6,000 years old

Read it again, Pikachu, it doesn't say that.
@GodSpeed63

Read it again, Pikachu, it doesn't say that.

Wrong.

the authors report again and again that the images show surprisingly many galaxies, galaxies that are surprisingly smooth, surprisingly small and surprisingly old.

Unless you think by "surprisingly old" they meant "far, far, far ,FAR younger than previous estimates".....

You can't twist science to your own ends. Facts are facts.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Pikachu
Wrong.

Don't start an argument you can't finish, Pikachu, and this is one of those arguments.
@GodSpeed63

Pay attention:

the authors report again and again that the images show surprisingly many galaxies, galaxies that are surprisingly smooth, surprisingly small and surprisingly old.

Unless you think by "surprisingly old" they meant "far, far, far ,FAR younger than previous estimates".....
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
Don't start an argument you can't finish,

You alway do. You still owe me a light year
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
Read it again, Pikachu, it doesn't say that.
Guess again chuckles, if you knew what a light year is, you would know Pikachu got it right , you and god got it wrong. As usual.