Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Replacing Darwin: Skeptics Cannot Supress The Truth In Science

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OY87K1dB2zU]

Creation is the whole of science.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DocSavage · M
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtkZMAmgHaU]





Here, you’re refuted. As good ( better ) than anything you got. With no god
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@DocSavage I recall Huxley’s response when apprised of Natural Selection:

“Of course! How simple! How extremely stupid not to have thought of that”

The fact is that [i]nobody[/i] thought of it until Darwin, yet once the idea was expressed it became universal acid, eating its way through all objections and obfuscations... as it continues to do.
@newjaninev2 Of course it just wasn’t Darwin. Alfred Wallace co-published too. The concept had roots in multiple ancient cultures.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@DocSavage [quote]Here, you’re refuted. As good ( better ) than anything you got. With no god[/quote]

The lies of men in this video cannot refute the Truth of God in the above video.
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
The lies , no they can’t. But the facts and evidence they show are more than enough to do the job. We win again. Darwin : 2. god : 0
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@DocSavage [quote]The lies , no they can’t.[/quote]

I just said that, Doc. So far, all you've done was prove the video that I shared on here is true.
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
what make the lies in your video so special ?
creationist lie constantly.
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
How would you know. It's not like you watched it.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@DocSavage [quote]How would you know. It's not like you watched it.[/quote]

It's a video by Richard Dawkins which means there's a lot of guess work and very little knowledge in it.
@GodSpeed63 Invest a little time a Wikipedia.

Dawkins holds honorary doctorates in science from the University of Huddersfield, University of Westminster, Durham University, the University of Hull, the University of Antwerp, the University of Oslo, the University of Aberdeen, Open University, the Vrije Universiteit Brussel,[46] and the University of Valencia. He also holds honorary doctorates of letters from the University of St Andrews and the Australian National University (HonLittD, 1996), and was elected Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature in 1997 and a Fellow of the Royal Society (FRS) in 2001. He is one of the patrons of the Oxford University Scientific Society.

In 1987, Dawkins received a Royal Society of Literature award and a Los Angeles Times Literary Prize for his book The Blind Watchmaker. In the same year, he received a Sci. Tech Prize for Best Television Documentary Science Programme of the Year for his work on the BBC's Horizon episode The Blind Watchmaker.

Other awards include the Zoological Society of London's Silver Medal (1989), the Finlay Innovation Award (1990), the Michael Faraday Award (1990), the Nakayama Prize (1994), the fifth International Cosmos Prize (1997), the Kistler Prize (2001), the Medal of the Presidency of the Italian Republic (2001).

Lots of awards and praise for a biology professor that only "guesses".
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@BlueSkyKing Have you ever seen ‘Richard Dawkin's Love Letters’ on YouTube?

its hilarious... he reads excerpts from letters that creationists have sent to him 😂

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gW7607YiBso
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
And your video is by creationist, which means it has no knowledge in it whatsoever.
You apparently didn’t watch that one either.
DocSavage · M
@BlueSkyKing
It’s not like Godspeed63 would know the difference, it’s very unlikely he knows anything for that matter.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@DocSavage [quote]And your video is by creationist[/quote]

Using the old stalling tactic, I see, Doc.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@DocSavage it’s a bot
jackieash · 26-30
@newjaninev2 I find most of them are....