Top | Newest First | Oldest First
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
Oh cool! Some video entertainment. Let’s work through it together, OK?
I’ll skip the blah blah blah bits, and get straight to various claims, shall I? About 7 minutes in he says that his friend can’t build a mechanical dragonfly, therefore god exists.
Do you feel that’s a valid claim, or a [i]non sequitur?[/i]
I’ll skip the blah blah blah bits, and get straight to various claims, shall I? About 7 minutes in he says that his friend can’t build a mechanical dragonfly, therefore god exists.
Do you feel that’s a valid claim, or a [i]non sequitur?[/i]
View 37 more replies »
DocSavage · M
@newjaninev2
I’m still not quite convinced, I believe he’s a genuine fucking idiot.
I’m still not quite convinced, I believe he’s a genuine fucking idiot.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@DocSavage It has never made a combat that offers specifics, and every comment it makes is vague, generic, and disingenuous.
it posts some-or-other pathetic indoctrination video, and then [i]never[/i] refers to even a single part of that video
it posts some-or-other pathetic indoctrination video, and then [i]never[/i] refers to even a single part of that video
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 If things weren’t the way they are, then things would be different
[b]Is that correct?[/b]
Simple yes/no
[b]Is that correct?[/b]
Simple yes/no
DocSavage · M
Yeah, but Atheist can make sure people get it right. By keeping creationism out of real science classes.
DocSavage · M
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtkZMAmgHaU]
Here, you’re refuted. As good ( better ) than anything you got. With no god
Here, you’re refuted. As good ( better ) than anything you got. With no god
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@DocSavage [quote]And your video is by creationist[/quote]
Using the old stalling tactic, I see, Doc.
Using the old stalling tactic, I see, Doc.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@DocSavage it’s a bot
jackieash · 26-30
@newjaninev2 I find most of them are....
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
You still haven’t answered my question. What is a light year ?
If you watch your own video, you would see there is no need to refute it. All it does is suggest that a designer could have produced the same results that were accomplished by evolution. We refuted that argument four post ago. You lost that one too
You still haven’t answered my question. What is a light year ?
If you watch your own video, you would see there is no need to refute it. All it does is suggest that a designer could have produced the same results that were accomplished by evolution. We refuted that argument four post ago. You lost that one too
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@DocSavage @newjaninev2 @Sharon [quote]it’s a bot, so unable to address specific questions [/quote]
You guys were not able to refute the true knowledge in the above video, I see. Why am I not surprised, Doc.
You guys were not able to refute the true knowledge in the above video, I see. Why am I not surprised, Doc.
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
And you’re not able to understand the truth of the video below. You never answer any questions , you never say anything of value to anyone. No evidence, no intelligence. That’s why you’re not surprised. It’s all beyond your comprehension.
And you’re not able to understand the truth of the video below. You never answer any questions , you never say anything of value to anyone. No evidence, no intelligence. That’s why you’re not surprised. It’s all beyond your comprehension.
SW-User
It has proof though. That’s the key
Proof
Proof
DocSavage · M
Found this one to be the answer to everything
Lostpoet · M
Darwin was a Believer
Lostpoet · M
@GodSpeed63 wasn't his old man like a preacher or sumptin?
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
Sharon · F
[quote]Skeptics Cannot Supress The Truth In Science[/quote]
That's right, [b]you[/b] can't supress the truth in science no matter how hard you try to twist the evidence.
That's right, [b]you[/b] can't supress the truth in science no matter how hard you try to twist the evidence.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment