Replacing Darwin: Skeptics Cannot Supress The Truth In Science
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OY87K1dB2zU]
Creation is the whole of science.
Creation is the whole of science.
61-69, M
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
Oh cool! Some video entertainment. Let’s work through it together, OK?
I’ll skip the blah blah blah bits, and get straight to various claims, shall I? About 7 minutes in he says that his friend can’t build a mechanical dragonfly, therefore god exists.
Do you feel that’s a valid claim, or a [i]non sequitur?[/i]
I’ll skip the blah blah blah bits, and get straight to various claims, shall I? About 7 minutes in he says that his friend can’t build a mechanical dragonfly, therefore god exists.
Do you feel that’s a valid claim, or a [i]non sequitur?[/i]
1-25 of 40
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2 [quote]Oh cool! Some video entertainment. Let’s work through it together, OK?[/quote]
You're claiming to be scientist? I don't think so.
You're claiming to be scientist? I don't think so.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 About 7 minutes in he says that his friend can’t build a mechanical dragonfly, therefore god exists.
[b]Do you feel that’s a valid claim, or a non sequitur?[/b]
Nowhere... [b]absolutely nowhere[/b]... do I say that I’m a scientist. In fact, I have never made that claim anywhere.
Yet your response (it’s not a reply, because it merely runs away from my question) is about a claim that I never made, a claim that you invented so that you could yet again divert attention away from the creationist inability to support their own falsehoods and deceptions.
[b]You have yet again shown everyone that creationists lie[/b]
They lie without scruple or remorse
You post this duplicitous video and then try to walk away from it. Wait until we get to the bit where he looks at the camera and deliberately, knowingly, and mendaciously lies for his god. Don’t worry, I’ll be sure to highlight that bit for you. it’s the heart of his argument... and it’s wilfully false
For now, we’ll take it that you accept the opening argument of this video is a [i]non sequitur[/i] and a nonsense. That is the first of many lies and deceptions in this video that you will accept.
[b]Do you feel that’s a valid claim, or a non sequitur?[/b]
Nowhere... [b]absolutely nowhere[/b]... do I say that I’m a scientist. In fact, I have never made that claim anywhere.
Yet your response (it’s not a reply, because it merely runs away from my question) is about a claim that I never made, a claim that you invented so that you could yet again divert attention away from the creationist inability to support their own falsehoods and deceptions.
[b]You have yet again shown everyone that creationists lie[/b]
They lie without scruple or remorse
You post this duplicitous video and then try to walk away from it. Wait until we get to the bit where he looks at the camera and deliberately, knowingly, and mendaciously lies for his god. Don’t worry, I’ll be sure to highlight that bit for you. it’s the heart of his argument... and it’s wilfully false
For now, we’ll take it that you accept the opening argument of this video is a [i]non sequitur[/i] and a nonsense. That is the first of many lies and deceptions in this video that you will accept.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 I take it your lack of response is an acknowledgement that the video you posted is merely creationist deception.
You seem completely unwilling to examine the video and to have the deception identified and highlighted. Does that mean that you were willingly complicit in this deception?
You seem completely unwilling to examine the video and to have the deception identified and highlighted. Does that mean that you were willingly complicit in this deception?
Bushranger · 70-79, M
@newjaninev2 You've confused him by using words he doesn't understand.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@Bushranger [quote]using words he doesn't understand[/quote]
Oh dear! I tried not to use words such as ‘honesty’ or ‘integrity’ or ‘ethics’, but apparently you’re right.
Frankly, I feel this particular bot needs to be recoded
Oh dear! I tried not to use words such as ‘honesty’ or ‘integrity’ or ‘ethics’, but apparently you’re right.
Frankly, I feel this particular bot needs to be recoded
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2 @Bushranger @DocSavage [quote]I take it your lack of response is an acknowledgement that the video you posted is merely creationist deception.[/quote]
I take it that you guys are not able to refute the truth in the video above.
I take it that you guys are not able to refute the truth in the video above.
BlueSkyKing · M
@GodSpeed63 Tell us, if all these videos are so groundbreaking, why hasn’t the mass media reported them. There is zero evidence, zero data. SW isn’t a science based peer review site. If you wanted the least amount of attention for what you claim, SA the best place.
It is attention you want, from total strangers. Science is self correcting. You are not informing anyone with new evidence, but purposely promoting superstition and lies. Enjoying our frustration with your nonsense and only showing favor to those that speak the same. Lying is easy. Truth demands to be tested.
It is attention you want, from total strangers. Science is self correcting. You are not informing anyone with new evidence, but purposely promoting superstition and lies. Enjoying our frustration with your nonsense and only showing favor to those that speak the same. Lying is easy. Truth demands to be tested.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 any hint of a refutation has you running away like a coward.
Try actually responding to this...
About 7 minutes in he says that his friend can’t build a mechanical dragonfly, therefore god exists.
Do you feel that’s a valid claim, or a [i]non sequitur?[/i]
Try actually responding to this...
About 7 minutes in he says that his friend can’t build a mechanical dragonfly, therefore god exists.
Do you feel that’s a valid claim, or a [i]non sequitur?[/i]
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 and while you’re hiding, you might [i]finally[/i] find the time to answer this...
If things weren’t the way they are, then things would be different
[b]Is that correct?[/b]
Simple yes/no
If things weren’t the way they are, then things would be different
[b]Is that correct?[/b]
Simple yes/no
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2 [quote]any hint of a refutation has you running away like a coward.[/quote]
I'm still waiting for you guys to refute the video, Newjaninev. Quit running away, and stand up to support your claims.
I'm still waiting for you guys to refute the video, Newjaninev. Quit running away, and stand up to support your claims.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 I haven’t made any claims
I have, however, asked you a question.
The question is part of the refutation of the creationist indoctrination video you posted.
About 7 minutes in he says that his friend can’t build a mechanical dragonfly, therefore god exists.
[b]Do you feel that’s a valid claim, or a [i]non sequitur?[/i][/b]
You seem to realise that your creationist indoctrination video contains lies, because that must be why [b]you refuse to answer the question.[/b]
Gutless
Just a time-wasting bot
I have, however, asked you a question.
The question is part of the refutation of the creationist indoctrination video you posted.
About 7 minutes in he says that his friend can’t build a mechanical dragonfly, therefore god exists.
[b]Do you feel that’s a valid claim, or a [i]non sequitur?[/i][/b]
You seem to realise that your creationist indoctrination video contains lies, because that must be why [b]you refuse to answer the question.[/b]
Gutless
Just a time-wasting bot
BlueSkyKing · M
@GodSpeed63 What has happened since this groundbreaking video has appeared? It’s been ignored and nothing has changed. You are well experienced when it comes to ignoring, there’s your refute.
School is already in session. No new textbooks are in the planning stage except to update the findings of the latest science based research.
School is already in session. No new textbooks are in the planning stage except to update the findings of the latest science based research.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@BlueSkyKing @DocSavage @newjaninev2 [quote]You are well experienced when it comes to ignoring, there’s your refute.[/quote]
You guys are cackling like a group of scared hens in barnyard with no fox around. If you can't refute the video, just say so and move on.
You guys are cackling like a group of scared hens in barnyard with no fox around. If you can't refute the video, just say so and move on.
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
What is there to refute? Nothing in the video shows anything that can’t be credited to evolution. Nor is there anything that points to god. Since you probably didn’t even watch the thing yourself, I doubt you can argue any details.
And we’re still waiting to hear you definition of a light year, among other things.
What is there to refute? Nothing in the video shows anything that can’t be credited to evolution. Nor is there anything that points to god. Since you probably didn’t even watch the thing yourself, I doubt you can argue any details.
And we’re still waiting to hear you definition of a light year, among other things.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 and I’m waiting for you to offer a meaningful and germane response to this...
About 7 minutes in he says that his friend can’t build a mechanical dragonfly, therefore god exists.
Do you feel that’s a valid claim, or a [i]non sequitur?[/i]
But apparently you cannot, or are afraid to do so
in which case [b]you are dismissed[/b]
Everybody else here can see the impotence of creationism when confronted by reality, and draw their own conclusions.
About 7 minutes in he says that his friend can’t build a mechanical dragonfly, therefore god exists.
Do you feel that’s a valid claim, or a [i]non sequitur?[/i]
But apparently you cannot, or are afraid to do so
in which case [b]you are dismissed[/b]
Everybody else here can see the impotence of creationism when confronted by reality, and draw their own conclusions.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@Bushranger Yes, he’s merely a puerile time-waster, but at least he serves to highlight the ridiculous nature of creationism’s spurious claims.
BlueSkyKing · M
@GodSpeed63 The people that made all your YouTube videos are the cowards. They know they can’t publish their "results" for peer reviews. No data has been collected. No theories based on observation. No experiments. So they take the easiest and cheapest medium to spread creationist nonsense. Because the bible tells you so, you won’t question the illogical.
You’re barking up the wrong tree seeking our approval. Want to say you won? Go ahead. Doesn’t change a damn thing.
You’re barking up the wrong tree seeking our approval. Want to say you won? Go ahead. Doesn’t change a damn thing.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@DocSavage @Bushranger @newjaninev2 [quote]Yes, he’s merely a puerile time-waster[/quote]
The only time-wasters around here are you guys, Doc. You can't even admit to yourselves that, according to your standards, that you've been beaten.
The only time-wasters around here are you guys, Doc. You can't even admit to yourselves that, according to your standards, that you've been beaten.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@BlueSkyKing [quote]Want to say you won?[/quote]
It's not me that won, it's Christ within me that's the winner.
It's not me that won, it's Christ within me that's the winner.
1-25 of 40