How does the creationist accept that a DNA test shows they're related to their father but reject that a DNA test shows they're related to a chimp? [Spirituality & Religion]
DNA lets you see that you're related to your parents, somewhat more distantly related to your grandparents and what your racial heritage is. DNA lets us see that a tiger is closely related to a lion or a mouse is closely related to a beaver.....so why can't it show that you're closely related to a chimpanzee?
The real question to the creationist: At what point can you claim that DNA is no longer showing relatedness but a common designer and how do you justify that claim?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
@1490wayb If there weren’t differences, there wouldn’t be different species, and if there weren’t intra-species differences no species would survive at all.
Well you're certainly entitled to disagree but perhaps then you can answer the question posed here. At what point does DNA stop showing that two things are related and how do you justify that cut off?
