Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Question: As a creationist, how can you recognize a transitional fossil? Answer: when creationists can't agree which "kind" the specimen belongs to. [Spirituality & Religion]

A transitional fossil should show features which belong to the ancestral group and features which belong to the descendant group.
Creationists necessarily deny that these fossils exist but they expose the lie in their own argument when between them they cannot agree which "kind" a given fossils belongs in.
Is an Archaeopteryx a bird kind or a dinosaur kind? It has a mosaic of characteristics which makes it both.
Where do we draw the line between human kind and ape kind?

Well creationists just can't agree with each other which proves the fact that their features are so mosaic that they do indeed represent a transitional form between "kinds".


This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
yeronlyman · 51-55, M
God made them
@yeronlyman lol maybe he did but if he did then he used evolution to do it. "Transitional forms" just don't make sense under special creation.
yeronlyman · 51-55, M
@Pikachu ah he made evolution to confuse the humans
@yeronlyman I've heard it said that the devil made fossils to trick people lol
yeronlyman · 51-55, M
@Pikachu ah the divil ain’t no god lol
@yeronlyman Just one of the things some creationists say to reconcile the real world with their beliefs.
LordShadowfire · 100+, M
@yeronlyman So what you're saying is God made a bunch of fake fossils to trick us. He's a trickster god.
yeronlyman · 51-55, M
@LordShadowfire
Like god magic 🪄 ⛪️