Creationists love to trot out "Polystrate fossils" to prove young earth and Noah's flood. But they actually prove the OPPOSITE. Young earth debunked! [Spirituality & Religion]
Polystrate fossils (properly called upright fossils) are ancient fossilized tree-like plants which sit vertically passing through two or more strata.
[i][c=800000]Note: i've deleted the text in this post because i fear it will be a bit intimidating to the observer but i'm happy to repost it upon request.[/c][/i]
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
@Pikachu [quote]Note: i've deleted the text in this post because i fear it will be a bit intimidating to the observer but i'm happy to repost it upon request.[/quote]
[quote]You presented the evidence but you've not understood it.[/quote]
lol with God as your witness, at the time i'm asking you this question, do you know even [i]one [/i]piece of the counterevidence presented here, much less understand it? Yes or no. Answer.
[quote]Why would it be intimidating?[/quote]
Oh it's just a big wall of text delineating the refutation of the creationist interpretation of vertical fossils. It can be intimidating which causes some people just to ignore it. As i mention in the note, i'm happy to re-post it here if you want to engage with it.
@Pikachu [quote]with God as your witness, at the time i'm asking you this question, do you know even one piece of the counterevidence presented here, much less understand it?[/quote]
It's clear that I understand it, but you don't and neither did those who found it.
[quote]Oh it's just a big wall of text delineating the refutation of the creationist interpretation of vertical fossils.[/quote]
I doubt that. It's just more misrepresentation of the fossil record is all. Not very intimidating at all.
That was suspiciously non-specific, So with God as your witness, give me just one example of the counter evidence that you understood at the time i asked you that question.
We can discuss from there or you can admit (explicitly or by omission of a pertinent response) that you're lying and have no familiarity with or understanding of the subject matter of this thread.
[quote]I doubt that.[/quote]
Just say the word, tough guy and you and i will go toe to toe on it.
@Pikachu [quote]responses tend to be rather light on the details of the subject....[/quote] Light? Completely devoid thereof. His "proof" is no more than him saying so or "goddidit". He's not even a very good joke.
@newjaninev2 [quote]What’s clear is that you’re constantly running away from evidence that reveals the pathetic fiction of creationism.[/quote]
What's clear is that you have no refute for the fact that science will always point to God, Newjaninev, so you have to resort to ridicule in an attempt to discredit either God, or His Word, or those who believe on Him and His Word.
@Pikachu [quote]We can discuss from there or you can admit (explicitly or by omission of a pertinent response) that you're lying and have no familiarity with or understanding of the subject matter of this thread.[/quote]
I'm not lying at all, but you are lying, to yourself and to others.
So with God as your witness, bring up [i]just one[/i] of the arguments you understood at the time i asked you that question and we will discuss it. If you don't you were lying.
I can't stop you from playing your lying little boy games but i don't have to play them [i]with[/i] you.
@GodSpeed63 Nah, that would be the lunatic who wrote this: [quote]It's just more misrepresentation of the fossil record is all. Not very intimidating at all.[/quote]
@newjaninev2 Carazaa just blocked me. 🥳🍻🍻🥳 I don't know how long it will last, she'll probably unblock me again soon so I can see her "godly posts". :(
